The DOI matches its Crossref record; 7 of the 7 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Photobiology of microalgae mass cultures: understanding the tools for the next green revolution
Abstract
Several obstacles and limitations currently prevent the industrial exploitation of microalgae for feed, food and biofuel production. Photobioreactors (closed systems for algae cultivation) suffer from high-energy expenditures for mixing and cooling, while cultures in large-scale open ponds, which have a more favorable net energy ratio, are unstable ecosystems in which maintaining selected strains for long periods is difficult. Techniques for supplying nutrients and CO2, for mixing and for harvesting and processing the biomass in an energy-efficient manner are still under study and development. Despite these impediments and although microalgae are not superior to higher plants in terms of photosynthetic efficiency and productivity, microalgal cultures remain one of the most attractive sources of feed, food and next-generation biofuels since microalgae can be grown in saline or seawater on nonarable lands, can use fertilizers with an almost 100% efficiency, are able to attain much higher oil and protein yields than traditional crops and, being endowed with high growth rates, are easier to be improved via genetic and metabolic engineering.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Chisti, Y. (2007) · Biotechnology Advances · doi:10.1016/j.biotechadv.2007.02.001 · Cited by 9,524
Rodolfi, L., Chini Zittelli, G., Bassi, N., Padovani, G., Biondi, N., Bonini, G., & Tredici, M. R. (2009) · Biotechnology and Bioengineering · doi:10.1002/bit.22033 · Cited by 2,879
Self-citationPhotosynthetic energy conversion: natural and artificial
Barber, J. (2009) · Chem. Soc. Rev. · doi:10.1039/b802262n · Cited by 1,843
What is the maximum efficiency with which photosynthesis can convert solar energy into biomass?
Zhu, X.-G., Long, S. P., & Ort, D. R. (2008) · Current Opinion in Biotechnology · doi:10.1016/j.copbio.2008.02.004 · Cited by 1,145
Aquatic phototrophs: efficient alternatives to land-based crops for biofuels
Dismukes, G. C., Carrieri, D., Bennette, N., Ananyev, G. M., & Posewitz, M. C. (2008) · Current Opinion in Biotechnology · doi:10.1016/j.copbio.2008.05.007 · Cited by 733
(2008) · doi:10.1002/9780470995280.ch8 · Cited by 187
Optical properties of microalgae for enhanced biofuels production.
Mitra, M., & Melis, A. (2008) · Optics Express · doi:10.1364/oe.16.021807 · Cited by 74
Cited by
An outlook on microalgal biofuels
Wijffels, R. H., & Barbosa, M. J. (2010) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1189003 · Cited by 1,886
Cuéllar-Franca, R. M., & Azapagic, A. (2015) · Journal of CO2 Utilization · doi:10.1016/j.jcou.2014.12.001 · Cited by 1,571
Microalgae as versatile cellular factories for valued products
Koller, M., Muhr, A., & Braunegg, G. (2014) · Algal Research · doi:10.1016/j.algal.2014.09.002 · Cited by 639
The effect of light, salinity, and nitrogen availability on lipid production by Nannochloropsis sp.
Pal, D., Khozin-Goldberg, I., Cohen, Z., & Boussiba, S. (2011) · Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology · doi:10.1007/s00253-011-3170-1 · Cited by 575
Fourth generation biofuel: A review on risks and mitigation strategies.
Abdullah, B., Syed Muhammad, S. A. F., Shokravi, Z., Ismail, S., Kassim, K. A., Mahmood, A. N., & Aziz, M. M. A. (2019) · Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.rser.2019.02.018 · Cited by 531
Metadata
- Authors
- Tredici, M. R.
- Venue
- Biofuels
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2010-01
- Volume
- 1
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 143-162
- ISSN
- 1759-7269 (ISSN-L)
- 1759-7277
- OpenAlex
- W2075007192
- Cited by
- 450
- References
- 7
- FWCI
- 11.86
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Photobiology of microalgae mass cultures: understanding the tools for the next green revolution. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.4155/bfs.09.10
- The paper
- Tredici, M. R. (2010). Photobiology of microalgae mass cultures: understanding the tools for the next green revolution. Biofuels. https://doi.org/10.4155/bfs.09.10
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.