The DOI matches its Crossref record; 52 of the 52 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Drug Delivery to the lungs: Challenges and Opportunities
Abstract
Pulmonary drug delivery is relatively complex because the respiratory tract has evolved defense mechanisms to keep inhaled drug particles out of the lungs and to remove or inactivate them once deposited. In addition to these mechanical, chemical and immunological barriers, pulmonary drug delivery is adversely affected by the behavioral barriers of poor adherence and poor inhaler technique. Strategies to mitigate the effects of these barriers include use of inhaler devices and formulations that deliver drug to the lungs efficiently, appropriate inhaler technique and improved education of patients. Owing to the advantages offered by the pulmonary route, the challenges that the route poses are worth addressing, and if successfully addressed, the pulmonary route offers huge opportunities, often fulfilling unmet clinical needs.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Inhaled Iloprost for Severe Pulmonary Hypertension
Olschewski, H., Simonneau, G., Galiè, N., Higenbottam, T., Naeije, R., Rubin, L. J., Nikkho, S., Speich, R., Hoeper, M. M., Behr, J., et al. (2002) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa020204 · Cited by 1,783
Labiris, N. R., & Dolovich, M. B. (2003) · British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology · doi:10.1046/j.1365-2125.2003.01892.x · Cited by 1,245
What the pulmonary specialist should know about the new inhalation therapies
Laube, B. L., Janssens, H. M., de Jongh, F. H. C., Devadason, S. G., Dhand, R., Diot, P., Everard, M. L., Horvath, I., Navalesi, P., Voshaar, T., et al. (2011) · European Respiratory Journal · doi:10.1183/09031936.00166410 · Cited by 806
Device Selection and Outcomes of Aerosol Therapy: Evidence-Based Guidelines
Dolovich, M. B., Ahrens, R. C., Hess, D. R., Anderson, P., Dhand, R., Rau, J. L., Smaldone, G. C., & Guyatt, G. (2005) · Chest · doi:10.1378/chest.127.1.335 · Cited by 794
The Lungs as a Portal of Entry for Systemic Drug Delivery
Patton, J. S., Fishburn, C. S., & Weers, J. G. (2004) · Proceedings of the American Thoracic Society · doi:10.1513/pats.200409-049ta · Cited by 563
Systematic Review of Errors in Inhaler Use
Sanchis, J., Gich, I., & Pedersen, S. (2016) · CHEST · doi:10.1016/j.chest.2016.03.041 · Cited by 538
Aerosol drug delivery: developments in device design and clinical use
Dolovich, M. B., & Dhand, R. (2011) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(10)60926-9 · Cited by 505
Medication adherence issues in patients treated for COPD
Restrepo, R. (2008) · International Journal of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease · doi:10.2147/copd.s3036 · Cited by 407
Inhaler competence in asthma: Common errors, barriers to use and recommended solutions
Price, D., Bosnic-Anticevich, S., Briggs, A., Chrystyn, H., Rand, C., Scheuch, G., & Bousquet, J. (2013) · Respiratory Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.rmed.2012.09.017 · Cited by 358
Barrier function of airway tract epithelium
Ganesan, S., Comstock, A. T., & Sajjan, U. S. (2013) · Tissue Barriers · doi:10.4161/tisb.24997 · Cited by 345
Metadata
- Authors
- Newman, S. P.
- Venue
- Therapeutic Delivery
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2017-07
- Volume
- 8
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 647-661
- ISSN
- 2041-5990 (ISSN-L)
- 2041-6008
- OpenAlex
- W2738852352
- Cited by
- 328
- References
- 52
- FWCI
- 7.69
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Drug Delivery to the lungs: Challenges and Opportunities. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.4155/tde-2017-0037
- The paper
- Newman, S. P. (2017). Drug Delivery to the lungs: Challenges and Opportunities. Therapeutic Delivery. https://doi.org/10.4155/tde-2017-0037
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.