Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 806

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

What the pulmonary specialist should know about the new inhalation therapies

Open access
Laube, B.L., Janssens, H.M., de Jongh, F.H.C., Devadason, S.G., Dhand, R., Diot, P., Everard, M.L., Horvath, I., Navalesi, P., Voshaar, T., Chrystyn, H.·2011·European Respiratory Journal

Abstract

A collaboration of multidisciplinary experts on the delivery of pharmaceutical aerosols was facilitated by the European Respiratory Society (ERS) and the International Society for Aerosols in Medicine (ISAM), in order to draw up a consensus statement with clear, up-to-date recommendations that enable the pulmonary physician to choose the type of aerosol delivery device that is most suitable for their patient. The focus of the consensus statement is the patient-use aspect of the aerosol delivery devices that are currently available. The subject was divided into different topics, which were in turn assigned to at least two experts. The authors searched the literature according to their own strategies, with no central literature review being performed. To achieve consensus, draft reports and recommendations were reviewed and voted on by the entire panel. Specific recommendations for use of the devices can be found throughout the statement. Healthcare providers should ensure that their patients can and will use these devices correctly. This requires that the clinician: is aware of the devices that are currently available to deliver the prescribed drugs; knows the various techniques that are appropriate for each device; is able to evaluate the patient's inhalation technique to be sure they are using the devices properly; and ensures that the inhalation method is appropriate for each patient.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1183/09031936.00166410

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Cited by

See all 806

Metadata

Authors
Laube, B. L., Janssens, H. M., de Jongh, F. H. C., Devadason, S. G., Dhand, R., Diot, P., Everard, M. L., Horvath, I., Navalesi, P., Voshaar, T., & Chrystyn, H.
Venue
European Respiratory Journal
Published
2011-02-10
Volume
37
Issue
6
Pages
1308-1417
ISSN
  • 0903-1936 (ISSN-L)
  • 1399-3003
OpenAlex
W2101909755
Cited by
806
References
1
FWCI
32.66
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: What the pulmonary specialist should know about the new inhalation therapies. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1183/09031936.00166410
The paper
Laube, B. L., Janssens, H. M., de Jongh, F. H. C., Devadason, S. G., Dhand, R., Diot, P., Everard, M. L., Horvath, I., Navalesi, P., Voshaar, T., & Chrystyn, H. (2011). What the pulmonary specialist should know about the new inhalation therapies. European Respiratory Journal. https://doi.org/10.1183/09031936.00166410

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.