The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
What the pulmonary specialist should know about the new inhalation therapies
Open accessAbstract
A collaboration of multidisciplinary experts on the delivery of pharmaceutical aerosols was facilitated by the European Respiratory Society (ERS) and the International Society for Aerosols in Medicine (ISAM), in order to draw up a consensus statement with clear, up-to-date recommendations that enable the pulmonary physician to choose the type of aerosol delivery device that is most suitable for their patient. The focus of the consensus statement is the patient-use aspect of the aerosol delivery devices that are currently available. The subject was divided into different topics, which were in turn assigned to at least two experts. The authors searched the literature according to their own strategies, with no central literature review being performed. To achieve consensus, draft reports and recommendations were reviewed and voted on by the entire panel. Specific recommendations for use of the devices can be found throughout the statement. Healthcare providers should ensure that their patients can and will use these devices correctly. This requires that the clinician: is aware of the devices that are currently available to deliver the prescribed drugs; knows the various techniques that are appropriate for each device; is able to evaluate the patient's inhalation technique to be sure they are using the devices properly; and ensures that the inhalation method is appropriate for each patient.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Choosing inhaler devices for people with asthma: Current knowledge and outstanding research needs
Haughney, J., Price, D., Barnes, N. C., Virchow, J. C., Roche, N., & Chrystyn, H. (2010) · Respiratory Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.rmed.2010.04.012 · Cited by 190
Self-citation
Cited by
Drug Delivery to the lungs: Challenges and Opportunities
Newman, S. P. (2017) · Therapeutic Delivery · doi:10.4155/tde-2017-0037 · Cited by 328
Drugs Prescribed for Asthma and Their Adverse Effects on Dental Health
Pacheco-Quito, E.-M., Jaramillo, J., Sarmiento-Ordoñez, J., & Cuenca-León, K. (2023) · Dentistry Journal · doi:10.3390/dj11050113 · Cited by 33
Metadata
- Authors
- Laube, B. L., Janssens, H. M., de Jongh, F. H. C., Devadason, S. G., Dhand, R., Diot, P., Everard, M. L., Horvath, I., Navalesi, P., Voshaar, T., & Chrystyn, H.
- Venue
- European Respiratory Journal
- Publisher
- European Respiratory Society (ERS)
- Published
- 2011-02-10
- Volume
- 37
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 1308-1417
- ISSN
- 0903-1936 (ISSN-L)
- 1399-3003
- OpenAlex
- W2101909755
- Cited by
- 806
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 32.66
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: What the pulmonary specialist should know about the new inhalation therapies. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1183/09031936.00166410
- The paper
- Laube, B. L., Janssens, H. M., de Jongh, F. H. C., Devadason, S. G., Dhand, R., Diot, P., Everard, M. L., Horvath, I., Navalesi, P., Voshaar, T., & Chrystyn, H. (2011). What the pulmonary specialist should know about the new inhalation therapies. European Respiratory Journal. https://doi.org/10.1183/09031936.00166410
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.