The Miner’s Canary
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Guinier and Torres' view that achieving racial justice and a healthy democratic process is a distinctly American challenge is not strictly accurate.
“However, Guinier and Torres' (2002) view that achieving racial justice and a healthy democratic process is a distinctly American challenge is not strictly accurate.”
From Talk the talk, walk the walk: defining Critical Race Theory in research (2012) · cites this paper as Guinier and Torres' (2002)
The underlying message of interpreting Harlan's quote as a commitment to ignore race insinuates that recognizing race is problematic and therefore the solution is to discount race.
“The underlying message of this interpretation insinuates that recognizing race is problematic and therefore the solution is to discount race (Guinier and Torres 2002).”
From Conceptualizing color-evasiveness: using dis/ability critical race theory to expand a color-blind racial ideology in education and society (2017) · cites this paper as Guinier and Torres 2002
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Dis/ability critical race studies (DisCrit): theorizing at the intersections of race and dis/ability
Annamma, S. A., Connor, D., & Ferri, B. (2013) · Race Ethnicity and Education · doi:10.1080/13613324.2012.730511 · Cited by 1,272 · see citing works
Annamma, S. A., Jackson, D. D., & Morrison, D. (2017) · Race Ethnicity and Education · doi:10.1080/13613324.2016.1248837 · Cited by 738 · see citing works
Talk the talk, walk the walk: defining Critical Race Theory in research
Hylton, K. (2012) · Race Ethnicity and Education · doi:10.1080/13613324.2012.638862 · Cited by 173 · see citing works
Brown, C. P., Weber, N. B., & Yoon, Y. (2016) · Contemporary Issues in Early Childhood · doi:10.1177/1463949116647286 · Cited by 10 · see citing works
- Authors
- Guinier, L., & Torres, G.
- ORCID
- Torres, Gerald
- Venue
- Harvard University Press eBooks
- Publisher
- Harvard University Press
- Published
- 2002-12-31
- OpenAlex
- W4207026423
- Cited by
- 273
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 8 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 14 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 13 · 2015: 10 · 2014: 14 · 2013: 13 · 2012: 9
- FWCI
- 22.51
- Type
- book
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Harvard University Press eBooks (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Public Administration › Labor Movements and Unions
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Literature and Literary Theory › Folklore, Mythology, and Literature Studies
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law › American Environmental and Regional History
- Keywords
- miners, canaries, coal mining, mine safety
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
