Cited by 10Teacher Education and Leadership StudiesEarly Childhood Education and DevelopmentCritical and Liberation Pedagogy

Reluctantly governed: The struggles of early educators in a professional development course that challenged their teaching in a high-stakes neo-liberal early education context

Brown, Christopher P, Weber, Natalie Babiak, Yoon, Yeojoo·2016·Contemporary Issues in Early Childhood

Abstract

This article documents the pedagogical and practical struggles of a sample of early educators in a large urban school district in the USA who engaged in a professional development course which offered them alternative conceptions of teaching that critically questioned the norms and practices of their high-stakes neo-liberal early education system. Examining the evolution of some of these teachers’ conceptions and practices illuminates the challenges that exist in attempting to address culturally relevant issues with students in a highly scripted and surveilled teaching context. It also reveals three key issues that early educators, teacher educators, and those who advocate for early childhood education should consider when developing and/or enacting alternative conceptions of teaching in similar neo-liberal early education environments.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/1463949116647286

Cites

110 of 110 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Six studies referred to a lack of resources, either in terms of time available to follow PD and implement new practices or in terms of insufficient culturally responsive materials.

    “six studies referred to a lack of resources, either in terms of time available to follow PD and implement new practices (e.g., Biasutti et al., 2019;Brown et al., 2016) or in terms of insufficient culturally responsive materials (i.e., Daniel & Pray, 2017;Spies et al., 2017).”
  • The lack of empowerment to implement new knowledge and skills in the classroom was also mentioned in the study by Brown et al. (2016).

    “this lack of empowerment to implement new knowledge and skills in the classroom was also mentioned in the study by Brown et al. (2016).”
  • The 45 papers showed great variation when it comes to design and sample size, ranging from single case studies including two teachers in two school settings to large scale PD interventions including more than 500 teachers in over 60 schools.

    “the 45 papers showed great variation when it comes to design and sample size, ranging from single case studies including two teachers in two school settings (i.e., Brown, Babiak, Weber, & Yoon, 2016) to large scale PD interventions including more than 500 teachers in over 60 schools (i.e., Van der Wildt et al., 2017).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

2 of the 112 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Brown, C. P., Weber, N. B., & Yoon, Y.
Affiliations
  • The University of Texas at Austin (US)
  • University of Mary Hardin–Baylor (US)
Corresponding author
Brown, Christopher P
Venue
Contemporary Issues in Early Childhood
Published
2016-05-03
Volume
17
Issue
2
Pages
210-234
ISSN
1463-9491 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2345647037
Cited by
10
References
112
Citations by year
2024: 2 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 2 · 2018: 2
FWCI
2.96
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Contemporary Issues in Early Childhood (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Education › Teacher Education and Leadership Studies
  • Social Sciences › Education › Early Childhood Education and Development
  • Social Sciences › Education › Critical and Liberation Pedagogy
Keywords
early childhood educators, professional development, neoliberalism, early childhood education, teacher agency, culturally relevant pedagogy, school surveillance, high-stakes testing, teacher conceptions of teaching, urban school districts, teacher professional development

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review