The DOI matches its Crossref record.
A Natural History of Human Morality
Abstract
Michael Tomasello offers the most detailed account to date of the evolution of human moral psychology. Based on experimental data comparing great apes and human children, he reconstructs two key evolutionary steps whereby early humans gradually became an ultra-cooperative and, eventually, a moral species capable of acting as a plural agent “we”.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“This general idea has been elaborated particularly clearly by Tomasello (2016), who presented an explanation for the evolution of morality that included a proposal for the reduction of aggressiveness in H. sapiens. Tomasello called it the “interdependence hypothesis.””
From Hypotheses for the Evolution of Reduced Reactive Aggression in the Context of Human Self-Domestication (2019) · cites this paper as Tomasello, 2016
In the citing paper
“Selection favored a low propensity for male aggression because offspring were thereby better protected from the father’s potential violence.”
From Hypotheses for the Evolution of Reduced Reactive Aggression in the Context of Human Self-Domestication (2019) · cites this paper as Tomasello, 2016
In the citing paper
“The result was a new kind of interdependence, such that individuals who were collaborative and less selfish were favored: cooperators fed better, for instance, than those who were not chosen as foraging partners.”
From Hypotheses for the Evolution of Reduced Reactive Aggression in the Context of Human Self-Domestication (2019) · cites this paper as Tomasello, 2016
In the citing paper
“First, due to this ecological change, mid-Pleistocene Homo were forced to collaborate in the food quest, rather than foraging individually as they had until then.”
From Hypotheses for the Evolution of Reduced Reactive Aggression in the Context of Human Self-Domestication (2019) · cites this paper as Tomasello, 2016
In the citing paper
“Effective cooperation depended on a reduction in selfishness and aggressiveness, and on a concomitant increase in sympathy and shared intentionality.”
From Hypotheses for the Evolution of Reduced Reactive Aggression in the Context of Human Self-Domestication (2019) · cites this paper as Tomasello, 2016
In the citing paper
“According to the interdependence hypothesis the initial influence on the road to a human style of morality occurred around 400,000 years ago when there was a “disappearance of individually obtainable foods” (Tomasello, 2016: 136).”
From Hypotheses for the Evolution of Reduced Reactive Aggression in the Context of Human Self-Domestication (2019) · cites this paper as Tomasello, 2016
In the citing paper
“The ability to conduct planned executions means that the killers must share explicit intentions with each other, a capacity that is unique to humans (Tomasello, 2016).”
From Hypotheses for the Evolution of Reduced Reactive Aggression in the Context of Human Self-Domestication (2019) · cites this paper as Tomasello, 2016
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 101–200 of 913
Powell, R. (2020) · The MIT Press eBooks · doi:10.7551/mitpress/11182.001.0001 · Cited by 48
In search of animal normativity: a framework for studying social norms in non‐human animals
Westra, E., Fitzpatrick, S., Brosnan, S. F., Gruber, T., Hobaiter, C., Hopper, L. M., Kelly, D., Krupenye, C., Luncz, L. V., Theriault, J. E., et al. (2024) · Biological reviews/Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society · doi:10.1111/brv.13056 · Cited by 45
“This capacity enables children fi rst to understand each person ’ s role in a collaborative activity and later to understand what ‘ we ’ , qua group, demand from each other (Schmidt & Rakoczy, 2019; Tomasello, 2016 a , 2019).”
InfluentialChimpanzee normativity: evidence and objections
Fitzpatrick, S. (2020) · Biology & Philosophy · doi:10.1007/s10539-020-09763-1 · Cited by 35
“…relatives, the dominant view being that psychological capacities for social norms, normative evaluation and motivation evolved uniquely in the human lineage, after our last common ancestor with chimpanzees and bonobos (e.g., Kitcher 2011; Henrich 2015; Tomasello 2016; Schmidt and Rakoczy 2019).”
BackgroundInfluentialChimpanzees and children avoid mutual defection in a social dilemma
Sánchez-Amaro, A., Duguid, S., Call, J., & Tomasello, M. (2018) · Evolution and Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2018.07.004 · Cited by 32
“For example, chimpanzees and bonobos can negotiate unequal reward distributions in the Snowdrift game (Sudgen, 1986) and avoid the complete breakdown of cooperation and thus avoid complete loss of rewards (Melis, Hare, & Tomasello, 2009; Sánchez-Amaro, Duguid, Call, & Tomasello, 2016, 2017).”
BackgroundResultInfluentialSelf-citationRupture and Repair in Mentalization-Based Group Psychotherapy
BATEMAN, A. W., Campbell, C., & Fonagy, P. (2021) · International Journal of Group Psychotherapy · doi:10.1080/00207284.2020.1847655 · Cited by 35
“It is dual level because it encompasses a shared focus on something and individual perspectives upon the same thing (Tomasello, 2016).”
BackgroundInfluentialWhat is it like to be a chimpanzee?
Tomasello, M. (2022) · Synthese · doi:10.1007/s11229-022-03574-5 · Cited by 30
“There is much evidence (reviewed in more detail in Tomasello 2014 , 2016 , 2019 ) that great apes have not evolved to operate in this way, neither to collaborate with other individuals in acts of joint intentionality nor to identify and commit to their social group in acts of collective…”
Self-citationHrdy, S. B., & Burkart, J. M. (2022) · Evolutionary psychology · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-76000-7_8 · Cited by 33
Agency and Cognitive Development
Tomasello, M. (2024) · doi:10.1093/9780191998294.001.0001 · Cited by 35
Self-citationEvidence for a developmental shift in the motivation underlying helping in early childhood
Hepach, R., Engelmann, J. M., Herrmann, E., Gerdemann, S. C., & Tomasello, M. (2022) · Developmental Science · doi:10.1111/desc.13253 · Cited by 28
“…that prosocial actions are motivated by a complex interaction of intrinsic and strategic motivations (Laffan & Dolan, 2020; Sperber & Baumard, 2012; Tomasello, 2016), some scholars claim that actions such as helping or sharing can be fully accounted for in terms of strategic motivations, and, more…”
Self-citationEvolution and Ontogenesis: The Deontic Niche of Human Development
Packer, M. J., & Cole, M. (2019) · Human Development · doi:10.1159/000500172 · Cited by 30
Attentional saliency and ingroup biases: From society to the brain
Moradi, Z., Najlerahim, A., Macrae, C. N., & Humphreys, G. W. (2020) · Social Neuroscience · doi:10.1080/17470919.2020.1716070 · Cited by 31
“Driving this viewpoint is the assumption that humans have an evolved tendency to seek out ingroup, as opposed to outgroup, members with whom they can forge potential co-operative (vs. competitive) allegiances (Lewis & Bates, 2010; Tomasello, 2016).”
BackgroundDuguid, S., Wyman, E., Grueneisen, S., & Tomasello, M. (2020) · Journal of comparative psychology · doi:10.1037/com0000220 · Cited by 27
“…collaboration in a mutualistic 580 context is key to fully understanding the evolution of human cooperation (Balliet, Tybur, & Lange; Balliet et al., 581 2017; Tomasello, 2016) and our results contribute to the developing picture of the way chimpanzees and 582 children coordinate their decisions.”
Self-citationO'Neill, E. E. (2017) · Philosophy Compass · doi:10.1111/phc3.12416 · Cited by 30
“Ultimately, both norms of welfare and of fairness came to have a particular phenomenology and a “ three ‐ way generality ” that applies to agents, targets, and standards (Tomasello, 2016, 102 – 103).”
Moral sciences and the role of education
Krettenauer, T. (2020) · Journal of Moral Education · doi:10.1080/03057240.2020.1784713 · Cited by 36
Otteson, J. R. (2019) · doi:10.1093/oso/9780190914202.001.0001 · Cited by 27
Development of moral identity: From the age of responsibility to adult maturity
Krettenauer, T. (2022) · Developmental Review · doi:10.1016/j.dr.2022.101036 · Cited by 41
Berti, M., Jarvis, W., Nikolova, N., & Pitsis, A. (2020) · Academy of Management Learning and Education · doi:10.5465/amle.2019.0034 · Cited by 30
Critical thinking as cooperation and its relation to mental health and social welfare
Ollinheimo, A., & Hakkarainen, K. (2022) · New Ideas in Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.newideapsych.2022.100988 · Cited by 29
Darwall, S. (2024) · doi:10.1093/9780191990281.001.0001 · Cited by 26
Introduction: Affect and Texts: Contemporary Inquiry in Historical Context
Wehrs, D. R. (2017) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-63303-9_1 · Cited by 25
Vincini, S. (2023) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1068404 · Cited by 24
“Hence, I use the term “shared intentionality” as generally applying to this range of phenomena, in accord with the philosophical literature, as well as with some of the relevant psychological literature (e.g., Tomasello, 2016).”
BackgroundMethodChildren’s developing metaethical judgments
Schmidt, M. F. H., Gonzalez-Cabrera, I. D., & Tomasello, M. (2017) · Journal of Experimental Child Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jecp.2017.07.008 · Cited by 27
Self-citation“Rivers of blood”: Migration, fear and threat construction
Kopytowska, M., & Chilton, P. (2018) · Lodz Papers in Pragmatics · doi:10.1515/lpp-2018-0007 · Cited by 24
“Human communication is also based on acceptance of the reliability of communications (cf. Tomasello 2016), which may explain the readiness of humans to process, and sometimes to automatically accept, incoming statements.”
BackgroundThe moral capacity as a biological adaptation: A commentary on Tomasello
van Schaik, C. P., & Burkart, J. M. (2018) · Philosophical Psychology · doi:10.1080/09515089.2018.1486608 · Cited by 23
“Tomasello (2016) gives an overview of these results, several of them produced in his own group (see especially Callaghan et al., 2011).”
BackgroundInfluentialPettit, P. N. (2025) · doi:10.1093/9780192608208.001.0001 · Cited by 39
What is a rite? Émile Durkheim, a hundred years later
D’Orsi, L., & Dei, F. (2018) · Open Information Science · doi:10.1515/opis-2018-0009 · Cited by 23
Human children but not chimpanzees make irrational decisions driven by social comparison
Herrmann, E., Haux, L. M., Zeidler, H., & Engelmann, J. M. (2019) · Proceedings of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rspb.2018.2228 · Cited by 23
The influence of friendship and merit on children’s resource allocation in three societies
Engelmann, J. M., Zhang, Z., Zeidler, H., Dunham, Y. C., & Herrmann, E. (2021) · Journal of Experimental Child Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jecp.2021.105149 · Cited by 22
“At around 6 or 7 years of age, however, children’s allocation decisions begin to vary across societies and to reflect what adults of the respective populations judge to be the appropriate sharing norm (House et al., 2013, 2020; House & Tomasello, 2018).”
BackgroundResultHow preschoolers react to norm violations is associated with culture
Gampe, A., & Daum, M. M. (2017) · Journal of Experimental Child Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jecp.2017.06.009 · Cited by 24
On the Moral Functions of Language
Li, L., & Tomasello, M. (2021) · Social Cognition · doi:10.1521/soco.2021.39.1.99 · Cited by 25
Self-citationDifferences in the Social Motivations and Emotions of Humans and Other Great Apes
Tomasello, M. (2023) · Human Nature · doi:10.1007/s12110-023-09464-0 · Cited by 22
“…have failed to replicate the Brosnan and de Waal (2003) experiment with capuchin monkeys when more stringent control conditions are employed (see Tomasello, 2016, for specific citations), and three studies from a single laboratory have failed to replicate Brosnan et al.’s (2005 ) experiments…”
InfluentialSelf-citationFirst steps toward an understanding of procedural fairness
Surian, L., & Margoni, F. (2020) · Developmental Science · doi:10.1111/desc.12939 · Cited by 21
Qiu, X., Yu, J., Li, T., Cheng, N., & Zhu, L. (2017) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01855 · Cited by 22
“Keywords: knowledge-behavior gap, advantageous inequity aversion, disadvantageous inequity aversion, procedural justice, fairness concerns INTRODUCTION Fairness is crucial for maintaining interpersonal relationship and promoting social cooperation (Brosnan and de Waal, 2014; Tomasello, 2016).”
BackgroundOatley, K., Dunbar, R., & Budelmann, F. (2018) · Review of General Psychology · doi:10.1037/gpr0000149 · Cited by 24
“Tomasello (2014, 2016) has argued that cooperation is fundamental to being human.”
BackgroundEmpathy, Sympathy, Concern and Moral Agency
Roughley, N., & Schramme, T. (2017) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781316271698.001 · Cited by 21
Luyten, P., Campbell, C., & Fonagy, P. (2022) · Psychoanalytic Psychology · doi:10.1037/pap0000398 · Cited by 24
Role of stellar physics in regulating the critical steps for life
Lingam, M., & Loeb, A. (2019) · International Journal of Astrobiology · doi:10.1017/s1473550419000016 · Cited by 25
“In addition to the distinctive ability to construct and utilize sophisticated tools (giving rise to complex information- and technology-driven networks), other attributes such as cumulative cultural transmission, social learning, mental time travel, large-scale social cooperation, mind reading, recursion and syntactic…”
BackgroundValue of species and the evolution of conservation ethics
Hare, D., Blossey, B., & Reeve, H. K. (2018) · Royal Society Open Science · doi:10.1098/rsos.181038 · Cited by 23
How genealogies can affect the space of reasons
Queloz, M. (2018) · Synthese · doi:10.1007/s11229-018-1777-9 · Cited by 22
“5 Looking beyond disciplinary boundaries, one might also include Jonathan Haidt (2012), Joshua Greene (2013), and Michael Tomasello (2016).”
BackgroundFemale cooperative labour networks in hunter–gatherers and horticulturalists
Kraft, T. S., Cummings, D. K., Venkataraman, V. V., Alami, S., Beheim, B., Hooper, P. L., Seabright, E., Trumble, B. C., Stieglitz, J., Kaplan, H. S., et al. (2022) · Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rstb.2021.0431 · Cited by 20
“Of these, Tomasello’s ‘interdependence hypothesis’ [64] posits that an ecological shift to foods that were not individually obtainable drove increased interdependence and selection for less selfish, more cooperative foraging partners.”
BackgroundLupu, N., Pontusson, J., Mathisen, R., Schakel, W., Hense, S., Elsässer, L., Persson, M., Elkjær, M. A., Iversen, T., Bartels, L. M., et al. (2023) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781009428682 · Cited by 21
Mucci, C. (2019) · The American Journal of Psychoanalysis · doi:10.1057/s11231-019-09225-y · Cited by 19
In- and out-groups across cultures: Identities and perceived group values
Hitlin, S., Kwon, H. W., & Firat, R. B. (2021) · Social Science Research · doi:10.1016/j.ssresearch.2021.102569 · Cited by 19
Prosocial Behavior in Preschoolers: Effects of Early Socialization Experiences With Peers
Salerni, N., & Caprin, C. (2022) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2022.840080 · Cited by 19
“With development, therefore, there should be a general increase in the enactment of prosocial behaviors, but also a greater selectivity with respect to the recipient (Tomasello, 2009, 2016, 2019; Kuhlmeier et al., 2014).”
BackgroundInfluentialvan de Poel, I. (2022) · Prometheus · doi:10.13169/prometheus.38.1.0007 · Cited by 19
Disagreement, justification, and equitable moral judgments: A brief training study
Li, L., & Tomasello, M. (2022) · Journal of Experimental Child Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jecp.2022.105494 · Cited by 19
Self-citationGreat Apes and Human Development: A Personal History
Tomasello, M. (2018) · Child Development Perspectives · doi:10.1111/cdep.12281 · Cited by 24
“formed both human cognition as well as human sociality and morality (28, 29).”
BackgroundSelf-citationFoxall, G. R. (2021) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-77395-3_13 · Cited by 19
In defense of the commons: Young children negatively evaluate and sanction free-ridersPreprint
Yang, F., Choi, Y., Misch, A., Yang, X., & Dunham, Y. C. (2018) · doi:10.31234/osf.io/xmqk8 · Cited by 17
Shared Intentionality in Nonhuman Great Apes: a Normative Model
Papadopoulos, D. (2021) · Review of Philosophy and Psychology · doi:10.1007/s13164-021-00594-x · Cited by 18
“Tomasello (2014, 2016, 2020) goes on to 1 3 Shared Intentionality in Nonhuman Great Apes: a Normative… suggest that normative thinking depends upon shared intentionality, and therefore is also human unique.”
InfluentialGonzalez-Cabrera, I. D. (2021) · Synthese · doi:10.1007/s11229-022-03925-2 · Cited by 18
“…· Goal-directed behavioral control · Reinforcement learning · Social norm psychology A prominent view of the origins of morality focuses on the evolutionary and developmental interaction between instrumental rationality and shared intentionality (Gonzalez-Cabrera, 2017; Tomasello, 2016, 2020).”
BackgroundInfluentialGoal Slippage: A Mechanism for Spontaneous Instrumental Helping in Infancy?
Michael, J., & Székely, M. (2017) · Topoi · doi:10.1007/s11245-017-9485-5 · Cited by 18
“kin selection, direct (Trivers 1971) and indirect (Nowak and Sigmund 1998) reciprocity, and the interdependency hypothesis (Roberts 2005; Tomasello 2016).”
Background“Second-personal morality” and morality
Darwall, S. (2018) · Philosophical Psychology · doi:10.1080/09515089.2018.1486603 · Cited by 18
“…simply ‘fall’ and then form a joint goal given their common interests and common-ground strategic trust that each will act rationally in her own best interests,” even presumably when this is an interest in a joint accomplishment, with Gilbertian “joint commitments” (Tomasello, 2016, p. 64).”
BackgroundInspired to Lend a Hand? Attempts to Elicit Prosocial Behavior Through Goal Contagion
Brohmer, H., Fauler, A., Floto, C., Athenstaedt, U., Kedia, G., Eckerstorfer, L. V., & Corcoran, K. (2019) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00545 · Cited by 20
“And even other research highlighted group norms, partly as evolutionary preferences and explained helping by the motivation to avoid punishment (Fehr and Gächter, 2002; Silk and House, 2016; Tomasello, 2016; see also Nook et al., 2016).”
BackgroundPreschoolers learn new moral and conventional norms from direct experiences
Langenhoff, A. F., Dahl, A., & Srinivasan, M. (2021) · Journal of Experimental Child Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jecp.2021.105322 · Cited by 17
Infants Infer Social Relationships Between Individuals Who Engage in Imitative Social Interactions
Kudrnova, V., Spelke, E. S., & Thomas, A. J. (2024) · Open Mind · doi:10.1162/opmi_a_00124 · Cited by 28
“Over the first year of life, infants ’ social skills expand (Tomasello, 2016), as does the number of people with whom they interact (Helfrecht et al., 2020; Hrdy & Burkart, 2022).”
BackgroundBirch, J. (2018) · Philosophical Studies · doi:10.1007/s11098-018-1176-6 · Cited by 20
“This points to a central role for joint action in the story of human evolution (Sterelny 2012; Tomasello 2014, 2016).”
Young children share more under time pressure than after a delay
Plötner, M., Hepach, R., Over, H., Carpenter, M., & Tomasello, M. (2021) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0248121 · Cited by 15
“An alternative interpretation is that intuitive prosociality could be a natural, innate tendency of humans grounded in their evolutionary history [49].”
BackgroundSelf-citationScaffolding the emergence of infant helping: A longitudinal experiment
Dahl, A., Goeltz, M. T., & Brownell, C. A. (2021) · Child Development · doi:10.1111/cdev.13710 · Cited by 16
Template matching and moral judgment: A new method and empirical test
Ochoa, N. (2022) · Poetics · doi:10.1016/j.poetic.2021.101643 · Cited by 8
Inagaki, T. K., & Meyer, M. L. (2019) · Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience · doi:10.1093/scan/nsz052 · Cited by 16
Short-sighted greed? Focusing on the future promotes reputation-based generosityPreprint
Sjåstad, H. (2017) · doi:10.31234/osf.io/fw3gp · Cited by 16
Usage-based constructionist approaches and large language models
Goldberg, A. E. (2024) · Constructions and Frames · doi:10.1075/cf.23017.gol · Cited by 22
Affective Aversion, Ethics, and Fiction
Blake, T. (2017) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-63303-9_7 · Cited by 15
Naturalizing Tomasello’s history of morality
Pettit, P. N. (2018) · Philosophical Psychology · doi:10.1080/09515089.2018.1486609 · Cited by 15
Cortina, M. (2017) · Psychoanalytic Inquiry · doi:10.1080/07351690.2017.1362920 · Cited by 15
The Role of Assessor Teaching in Human Culture
Castro, L., Nogueira, M. Á. C., Villarroel, M., & Toro, M. Á. (2019) · Biological Theory · doi:10.1007/s13752-018-00314-2 · Cited by 15
Mauss's The Gift, or the necessity of an institutional perspective in economics
Cedrini, M. A., Ambrosino, A., Marchionatti, R., & Caillé, A. (2019) · Journal of Institutional Economics · doi:10.1017/s1744137419000687 · Cited by 14
Helping behavior is non-zero-sum: Helper and recipient autobiographical accounts of help
Ent, M. R., Sjåstad, H., von Hippel, W., & Baumeister, R. F. (2020) · Evolution and Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2020.02.004 · Cited by 14
From Shared Enaction to Intrinsic Value. How Enactivism Contributes to Environmental Ethics
Werner, K., & Kiełkowicz-Werner, M. (2021) · Topoi · doi:10.1007/s11245-021-09750-5 · Cited by 15
Riordan, D. V. (2021) · Biological Theory · doi:10.1007/s13752-021-00381-y · Cited by 20
The Love of Neuroscience: A Sociological Account
Abend, G. (2018) · Sociological Theory · doi:10.1177/0735275118759697 · Cited by 14
“Not to mention language and morality (Bekoff and Pierce 2009; Crane 2015; Putnam, Neiman, and Schloss 2014; Rowlands 2012; Tomasello 2016).”
BackgroundThree Unresolved Issues in Human Morality
Kagan, J. (2018) · Perspectives on Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/1745691617727862 · Cited by 17
“…belong to the category bad, are aware of the self as an agent who can act in good or bad ways, and spontaneously enforce some of their standards on others (Hardecker & Tomasello, 2017; Hepach, Vaish, Grossmann, & Tomasello, 2016; Kochanska, Gross, Lin, & Nichols, 2002; Schmidt & Tomasello, 2012).”
BackgroundInfluentialCoalitional Value Theory: an Evolutionary Approach to Understanding Culture
Winegard, B., Kirsch, A., Vonasch, A. J., Winegard, B. M., & Geary, D. C. (2020) · Evolutionary Psychological Science · doi:10.1007/s40806-020-00235-z · Cited by 14
“At the next stage, according to Tomasello and colleagues, humans, spurred by coalitional competition, began to form larger and more complicated groups with “collective intentions” and group norms, conventions, and institutions (Tomasello 2016; Tomasello et al. 2012).”
BackgroundSerfontein, B. (2021) · HTS Teologiese Studies / Theological Studies · doi:10.4102/hts.v77i3.6519 · Cited by 14
“The evolution of these uniquely human adaptations for cooperation took place in two main steps (Tomasello 2016, 2019:10; Tomasello et al. 2012).”
BackgroundHeinz Welsch, B. (2022) · Journal of Environmental Studies and Sciences · doi:10.1007/s13412-021-00745-7 · Cited by 20
“Welsch (2020) shows that the moral foundations proxied this way have very similar properties (correlations with each other and with sociodemographic variables) as variables obtained from the “Moral Foundations Questionnaire” (Graham et al.”
BackgroundMethodHusserl on shared intentionality and normativity
Salice, A. (2022) · Continental Philosophy Review · doi:10.1007/s11007-022-09593-w · Cited by 14
No evidence for inequity aversion in non-human animals: a meta-analysis of accept/reject paradigms
Ritov, O., Völter, C. J., Raihani, N., & Engelmann, J. M. (2024) · Proceedings of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rspb.2024.1452 · Cited by 24
Yıldız, T. (2025) · HUMANITAS - Uluslararası Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi · doi:10.20304/humanitas.1601228 · Cited by 37
Monsó, S., & Andrews, K. (2022) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oxfordhb/9780198871712.013.22 · Cited by 14
Toolmaking and the Origin of Normative CognitionPreprint
Birch, J. (2020) · PhilSci-Archive (University of Pittsburgh) · Cited by 14
LeBar, M. (2025) · doi:10.1093/9780197801482.001.0001 · Cited by 13
Equality of Authority as the Aristotelian Common Good
LeBar, M. (2020) · The Journal of Value Inquiry · doi:10.1007/s10790-020-09758-x · Cited by 13
“34 Tomasello 2016, 40, 80.”
Exploring the Cognitive Capacities of Japanese Macaques in a Cooperation Game
Sigmundson, R., Stribos, M. S., Hammer, R., Herzele, J., Pflüger, L. S., & Massen, J. J. M. (2021) · Animals · doi:10.3390/ani11061497 · Cited by 16
Safety in control-mastery theory
Fiorenza, E., Santodoro, M., Dazzi, N., & Gazzillo, F. (2023) · International Forum of Psychoanalysis · doi:10.1080/0803706x.2023.2168056 · Cited by 13
“More recently, and in line with the contributions of evolutionary psychology (Wilson & Wilson, 2008; Wilson, Van Vught, & O’Gorman, 2008) and developmental and moral psychology (Tomasello, 2016), CMT has emphasized the role of safety in connection with the perception of the wellbeing of both the self and significant o…”
BackgroundThe psychological mechanisms underlying reciprocal prosociality in chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes).
Schmelz, M., Grueneisen, S., & Tomasello, M. (2020) · Journal of Comparative Psychology · doi:10.1037/com0000200 · Cited by 7
“This would be consistent with the view that cooperation in primates is primarily based on affective mechanisms and bonding (Engelmann & Herrmann, 2016; Schino & Aureli, 2009; Tomasello, 2016; Wittig, Crockford, Langergraber, & Zuberbühler, 2014).”
BackgroundSelf-citationThe developmental emergence of morality: A review of current theoretical perspectives
Paulus, M. (2020) · Progress in brain research · doi:10.1016/bs.pbr.2020.05.006 · Cited by 15
Caring for Others: The Early Emergence of Sympathy and Guilt
Vaish, A., & Großmann, T. (2022) · Evolutionary psychology · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-76000-7_16 · Cited by 13
Bringing coherence to positive psychology: Faith in humanity
Tweed, R. G., Mah, E. Y., & Conway, L. G. (2020) · The Journal of Positive Psychology · doi:10.1080/17439760.2020.1725605 · Cited by 19
“A number of authors (e.g., Crocker, Canevello, & Brown, 2017; Fowers, 2015; Hare, 2017; Keltner, Kogan, Piff, & Saturn, 2014; Mikulincer & Shaver, 2010; Tomasello, 2016, 2019) provide important support for this anticipation of positive traits or positive potential among others.”
BackgroundEvolution of Human Sociality, The
Yılmaz, O., Bahçekapılı, H. G., & Sevi, B. (2021) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-19650-3_2890 · Cited by 13
Normative goals and the regulation of social behavior: The case of respect
Dunning, D. A. (2017) · Motivation and Emotion · doi:10.1007/s11031-017-9616-8 · Cited by 12
Examining Infants’ Individuation of Others by Sociomoral Disposition
Osorio, H. T., Lyons, A. B., & Cheries, E. W. (2019) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01271 · Cited by 12
Are there really so many moral emotions? Carving morality at its functional jointsPreprint
Fitouchi, L., André, J., & Baumard, N. (2021) · doi:10.31234/osf.io/2phzt · Cited by 15
“Researchers have long argued that morality likely evolved as a cognitive adaptation to the challenges of cooperation recurrent in human social life (Alexander, 1987; Baumard et al., 2013b; Boehm, 2012; Curry et al., 2019; Haidt, 2012; Tomasello, 2016; Trivers, 1971).”
BackgroundSteinhart, E. C. (2024) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781009452373 · Cited by 11
Masculinity cues, perceptions of politician attributes, and political behavior*
Chan, H. F., Skali, A., Stadelmann, D., et al. (2020) · Economics and Politics · doi:10.1111/ecpo.12164 · Cited by 11
Lenz, S., Essler, S., Wörle, M., & Paulus, M. (2020) · Journal of Experimental Child Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jecp.2020.105037 · Cited by 10
Future value change: Identifying realistic possibilities and risks
Hopster, J. K. G. (2022) · Prometheus · doi:10.13169/prometheus.38.1.0113 · Cited by 12
“As a result, researchers from multiple fields have taken an interest in the topic, scrutinizing, for instance, the evolutionary roots of moral cooperation (Boehm, 2012; Tomasello, 2016; Sterelny, 2021), the sociobiological and material pressures that have shaped moral systems throughout human history (Kitcher, 2011; M…”
BackgroundNakissa, A. (2023) · Religions · doi:10.3390/rel14020203 · Cited by 18
Mucci, C. (2017) · International Forum of Psychoanalysis · doi:10.1080/0803706x.2017.1362502 · Cited by 11
Tomasello, M. (2020) · Behavioral and Brain Sciences · doi:10.1017/s0140525x19002620 · Cited by 11
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Tomasello, M.
- Affiliations
- Max Planck Society (DE)
- Corresponding author
- Tomasello, Michael
- ORCID
- Tomasello, Michael
- Venue
- Harvard University Press eBooks
- Publisher
- Harvard University Press
- Published
- 2016-12-31
- OpenAlex
- W791834320
- Cited by
- 924
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 71 · 2025: 78 · 2024: 95 · 2023: 94 · 2022: 117 · 2021: 151 · 2020: 88 · 2019: 89 · 2018: 65 · 2017: 63 · 2016: 11
- FWCI
- 39.50
- Type
- book
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Harvard University Press eBooks (publishedVersion)
- Max Planck Digital Library (submittedVersion)
- MPG.PuRe (Max Planck Society) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Child and Animal Learning Development
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Evolutionary Psychology and Human Behavior
- Keywords
- human morality, moral psychology, evolution of morality, great apes, children, cooperation, social cognition, comparative psychology
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review