The DOI matches its Crossref record.
A Natural History of Human Morality
Abstract
Michael Tomasello offers the most detailed account to date of the evolution of human moral psychology. Based on experimental data comparing great apes and human children, he reconstructs two key evolutionary steps whereby early humans gradually became an ultra-cooperative and, eventually, a moral species capable of acting as a plural agent “we”.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“This general idea has been elaborated particularly clearly by Tomasello (2016), who presented an explanation for the evolution of morality that included a proposal for the reduction of aggressiveness in H. sapiens. Tomasello called it the “interdependence hypothesis.””
From Hypotheses for the Evolution of Reduced Reactive Aggression in the Context of Human Self-Domestication (2019) · cites this paper as Tomasello, 2016
In the citing paper
“Selection favored a low propensity for male aggression because offspring were thereby better protected from the father’s potential violence.”
From Hypotheses for the Evolution of Reduced Reactive Aggression in the Context of Human Self-Domestication (2019) · cites this paper as Tomasello, 2016
In the citing paper
“The result was a new kind of interdependence, such that individuals who were collaborative and less selfish were favored: cooperators fed better, for instance, than those who were not chosen as foraging partners.”
From Hypotheses for the Evolution of Reduced Reactive Aggression in the Context of Human Self-Domestication (2019) · cites this paper as Tomasello, 2016
In the citing paper
“First, due to this ecological change, mid-Pleistocene Homo were forced to collaborate in the food quest, rather than foraging individually as they had until then.”
From Hypotheses for the Evolution of Reduced Reactive Aggression in the Context of Human Self-Domestication (2019) · cites this paper as Tomasello, 2016
In the citing paper
“Effective cooperation depended on a reduction in selfishness and aggressiveness, and on a concomitant increase in sympathy and shared intentionality.”
From Hypotheses for the Evolution of Reduced Reactive Aggression in the Context of Human Self-Domestication (2019) · cites this paper as Tomasello, 2016
In the citing paper
“According to the interdependence hypothesis the initial influence on the road to a human style of morality occurred around 400,000 years ago when there was a “disappearance of individually obtainable foods” (Tomasello, 2016: 136).”
From Hypotheses for the Evolution of Reduced Reactive Aggression in the Context of Human Self-Domestication (2019) · cites this paper as Tomasello, 2016
In the citing paper
“The ability to conduct planned executions means that the killers must share explicit intentions with each other, a capacity that is unique to humans (Tomasello, 2016).”
From Hypotheses for the Evolution of Reduced Reactive Aggression in the Context of Human Self-Domestication (2019) · cites this paper as Tomasello, 2016
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Is It Good to Cooperate? Testing the Theory of Morality-as-Cooperation in 60 Societies
Curry, O. S., Mullins, D., & Whitehouse, H. (2019) · Current Anthropology · doi:10.1086/701478 · Cited by 782
“It is no accident that ideals of the good human life often emphasize relationship with others: an evolutionary adaptation enabling human beings to cooperate may be the disposition to fi nd relationship with others satisfying for their own sake (Moll et al. 2006; Tomasello 2016).”
Why people prefer unequal societies
Starmans, C., Sheskin, M., & Bloom, P. (2017) · Nature Human Behaviour · doi:10.1038/s41562-017-0082 · Cited by 556
Two types of aggression in human evolution.
Wrangham, R. W. (2018) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1713611115 · Cited by 410
Kinship, Cooperation, and the Evolution of Moral Systems*
Enke, B. (2019) · The Quarterly Journal of Economics · doi:10.1093/qje/qjz001 · Cited by 365
How children come to understand false beliefs: A shared intentionality account
Tomasello, M. (2018) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1804761115 · Cited by 320
Self-citationThe Practical Origins of Ideas
Queloz, M. (2021) · Analysis · doi:10.1093/oso/9780198868705.001.0001 · Cited by 240
The moral psychology of obligation
Tomasello, M. (2019) · Behavioral and Brain Sciences · doi:10.1017/s0140525x19001742 · Cited by 232
Self-citationThe Pleistocene Social Contract
Sterelny, K. (2021) · doi:10.1093/oso/9780197531389.001.0001 · Cited by 166
Reciprocity and the tragedies of maintaining and providing the commons
Gächter, S., Kölle, F., & Quercia, S. (2017) · Nature Human Behaviour · doi:10.1038/s41562-017-0191-5 · Cited by 147
“Humans are an exceptionally cooperative species able to collaborate for the creation of common benefit9,11–13.”
The influence of reputational concerns on children's prosociality
Engelmann, J. M., & Rapp, D. J. (2017) · Current Opinion in Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.copsyc.2017.08.024 · Cited by 167
“How can we make sense of this developmental transition? Theoretical accounts of reputation single out processes of partner choice as key to the emergence of concern for reputation [11,12 ,33 ,34].”
BackgroundTomasello, M. (2016) · Child Development · doi:10.1111/cdev.12499 · Cited by 168
Self-citationThe emergence of emotionally modern humans: implications for language and learning
Hrdy, S. B., & Burkart, J. M. (2020) · Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rstb.2019.0499 · Cited by 153
“Whatever standards prevail, quests to demonstrate mental and behavioural responses conforming to others’ preferences pave the way for internalizing group norms [129] and for behaviour that others consider ‘moral’ [89,130].”
BackgroundThe Role of Ontogeny in the Evolution of Human Cooperation
Tomasello, M., & Gonzalez-Cabrera, I. D. (2017) · Human Nature · doi:10.1007/s12110-017-9291-1 · Cited by 142
“But, as Tomasello (2016) has argued, it is not just that children of this age are being controlled by “them,” but rather they have internalized the collaborative role standards used by everyone as coming from “us,” and so they develop a genuine sense of cooperative identity that guides everything…”
BackgroundSelf-citationThe dual evolutionary foundations of political ideology
Claessens, S., Fischer, K., Chaudhuri, A., Sibley, C. G., & Atkinson, Q. D. (2020) · Nature Human Behaviour · doi:10.1038/s41562-020-0850-9 · Cited by 133
Why Does Awe Have Prosocial Effects? New Perspectives on Awe and the Small Self
Perlin, J. D., & Li, L. (2020) · Perspectives on Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/1745691619886006 · Cited by 135
“The capacity to notice others’ traits is a necessary feature of successfully evaluating others as potential partners for collaborative enterprises (Engelmann, Herrmann, & Tomasello, 2012; McAdams & Pals, 2006; Tomasello, 2016, 2019).”
BackgroundInfluentialChildren’s Sense of Fairness as Equal Respect
Engelmann, J. M., & Tomasello, M. (2019) · Trends in Cognitive Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.tics.2019.03.001 · Cited by 131
Self-citationHuman Social Evolution: Self-Domestication or Self-Control?
Shilton, D., Breski, M., Dor, D., & Jablonka, E. (2020) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2020.00134 · Cited by 117
“Many evolutionary-oriented scholars argue that this new capacity for lying was a major obstacle to the emergence and stabilization of language itself (Boyd et al., 2003; Knight, 2007; Mercier and Sperber, 2011; Tomasello, 2016).”
BackgroundBaumeister, R. F. (2017) · Addictive Behaviors Reports · doi:10.1016/j.abrep.2017.01.003 · Cited by 116
“The broader framework is that the distinctively human traits are adaptations to make culture possible (Baumeister, 2005; Suddendorf, 2013; Tomasello, 1999, 2014, 2016), and culture only works insofar as people follow rules.”
BackgroundCulture and psychopathology: An attempt at reconsidering the role of social learning
Fonagy, P., Campbell, C., Constantinou, M., Higgitt, A., Allison, E., & Luyten, P. (2021) · Development and Psychopathology · doi:10.1017/s0954579421000092 · Cited by 127
“The we-mode assumes a mutual recognition of the subjectivity and humanity of the other: “recognition of the other persons as agents or persons just as real as oneself…the recognition of an inescapable fact that characterizes the human condition” (Tomasello, 2016, p. 56).”
Ordinary people associate addiction with loss of free will
Vonasch, A. J., Clark, C. J., Lau, S., Vohs, K. D., & Baumeister, R. F. (2017) · Addictive Behaviors Reports · doi:10.1016/j.abrep.2017.01.002 · Cited by 113
“Moral responsibility is one of the foundations of human society and culture (e.g., Tomasello, 2016), and so granting some individuals an exemption from such responsibility, especially for socially destructive behavior, is a socially risky strategy.”
BackgroundWrangham, R. W. (2019) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01914 · Cited by 97
“The ability to conduct planned executions means that the killers must share explicit intentions with each other, a capacity that is unique to humans (Tomasello, 2016).”
BackgroundInfluentialTargeted conspiratorial killing, human self-domestication and the evolution of groupishness
Wrangham, R. W. (2021) · Evolutionary Human Sciences · doi:10.1017/ehs.2021.20 · Cited by 95
“Accordingly traits associated with fairness such as senses of responsibility, obligation, duty, guilt and shame appear to be restricted to humans, making their evolution a particularly interesting puzzle (Tomasello, 2016).”
BackgroundBaumeister, R. F., Maranges, H. M., & Sjåstad, H. (2018) · Psychology of Consciousness Theory Research and Practice · doi:10.1037/cns0000154 · Cited by 98
“Future cooperation is a key driver of moral evolution (Tomasello, 2016; Tomasello et al., 2012).”
BackgroundConcern for Group Reputation Increases Prosociality in Young Children
Engelmann, J. M., Herrmann, E., & Tomasello, M. (2017) · Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/0956797617733830 · Cited by 85
“Humans actively choose collaborative partners on the basis of characteristics relevant to cooperation, such as prosociality, trustworthiness, and fairness (Nowak & Sigmund, 1998; Sterelny, 2012; Tomasello, 2016).”
BackgroundSelf-citationAndrews, K. (2020) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108616522 · Cited by 95
Shared intentionality, reason-giving and the evolution of human culture
O’Madagain, C., & Tomasello, M. (2021) · Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rstb.2020.0320 · Cited by 87
Self-citationThe role of roles in uniquely human cognition and sociality
Tomasello, M. (2019) · Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour · doi:10.1111/jtsb.12223 · Cited by 88
“Thus, Vaish, Carpenter, and Tomasello (2016) found that when 3-year-old children thought that they had caused harm, they went to extensive efforts to repair it (and much more than if they had broken the toy when it caused no harm to anyone).”
InfluentialSelf-citationKumar, V., & Campbell, R. (2022) · doi:10.1093/oso/9780197600122.001.0001 · Cited by 79
Helping in young children and chimpanzees shows partiality towards friends
Engelmann, J. M., Haux, L. M., & Herrmann, E. (2019) · Evolution and Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2019.01.003 · Cited by 73
“The ability to foster a large variety of cooperative social relationships has played a central role in human evolution, spurring collaborative subsistence strategies and cooperative childcare to norms, institutions, and politics (Dunbar, 2012; Henrich, 2015; Tomasello, 2016).”
BackgroundAttachment, Mentalizing and Trauma: Then (1992) and Now (2022)
Fonagy, P., Campbell, C., & Luyten, P. (2023) · Brain Sciences · doi:10.3390/brainsci13030459 · Cited by 104
The Normative Turn in Early Moral Development
Tomasello, M. (2018) · Human Development · doi:10.1159/000492802 · Cited by 71
“This interpretation is bolstered by the observation that young children also intervene against individuals who violate mere conventions [albeit with less emotion; Hardecker, Schmidt, Roden, & Tomasello, 2016].”
BackgroundInfluentialSelf-citationHuman Self as Information Agent: Functioning in a Social Environment Based on Shared Meanings
Baumeister, R. F., Maranges, H. M., & Vohs, K. D. (2017) · Review of General Psychology · doi:10.1037/gpr0000114 · Cited by 77
“Although scholars debate the degree of self-awareness and moral sensitivity in non-human animals (e.g., de Waal, 2001; Gallup, 1970; Tomasello, 2016), human selfhood has many features and processes that go far beyond those of other creatures.”
Evolutionary Origins of Morality: Insights From Non-human Primates
Burkart, J. M., Brügger, R. K., & van Schaik, C. P. (2018) · Frontiers in Sociology · doi:10.3389/fsoc.2018.00017 · Cited by 80
“Compared to non-human great apes, every domain of our lives is built on high levels of interdependence (van Schaik and Burkart, 2010; Tomasello, 2016), from subsistence (foraging) and institutionalized activities to rearing children.”
Collective intentionality: A basic and early component of moral evolution
Boehm, C. (2018) · Philosophical Psychology · doi:10.1080/09515089.2018.1486607 · Cited by 72
“In general, great apes do not seem to be specifically adapted – beyond other mammals – for “cooperative ventures for mutual gain” (Tomasello, 2016, p. 143–144).”
BackgroundInfluentialFuchs, T. A. E. (2017) · Topoi · doi:10.1007/s11245-017-9499-z · Cited by 70
Chimpanzees return favors at a personal cost
Schmelz, M., Grueneisen, S., Kabalak, A., Jost, J., & Tomasello, M. (2017) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1700351114 · Cited by 70
Self-citationBaumeister, R. F. (2019) · Review of General Psychology · doi:10.1177/1089268019829472 · Cited by 67
What’s new in the new ideology critique?
Sankaran, K. (2019) · Philosophical Studies · doi:10.1007/s11098-019-01261-9 · Cited by 69
Social disappointment explains chimpanzees' behaviour in the inequity aversion task
Engelmann, J. M., Clift, J. B., Herrmann, E., & Tomasello, M. (2017) · Proceedings of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rspb.2017.1502 · Cited by 62
Self-citation“Toxic Masculinity” in the age of #MeToo: ritual, morality and gender archetypes across cultures
Veissière, S. P. L. (2018) · Society and Business Review · doi:10.1108/sbr-07-2018-0070 · Cited by 62
Young children, but not chimpanzees, are averse to disadvantageous and advantageous inequities
Ulber, J., Hamann, K., & Tomasello, M. (2016) · Journal of Experimental Child Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jecp.2016.10.013 · Cited by 60
“…rather by food comparison: Dubreuil, Gentile, and Visalberghi (2006), Fontenot, Watson, Roberts, and Miller (2007), McAuliffe and colleagues (2015), Roma, Silberberg, Ruggiero, and Suomi (2006), and Sheskin, Ashayeri, Skerry, and Santos (2014). was excluded from analysis due to experimenter error.”
BackgroundInfluentialSelf-citationKinship, Cooperation, and the Evolution of Moral Systems
Enke, B. (2017) · National Bureau of Economic Research · doi:10.3386/w23499 · Cited by 65
“Moral and evolutionary psychologists argue that human morality—people’s beliefs about “right” and “wrong”—partly evolved to solve social dilemma problems (e.g., Haidt 2012; Greene 2014; Tomasello 2016).”
InfluentialAssessing joint commitment as a process in great apes
Heesen, R., Bangerter, A., Zuberbühler, K., Iglesias, K., Neumann, C., Pajot, A., Perrenoud, L., Guéry, J., Rossano, F., & Genty, É. (2021) · iScience · doi:10.1016/j.isci.2021.102872 · Cited by 59
Children’s reasoning with peers and parents about moral dilemmas.
Mammen, M., Köymen, B., & Tomasello, M. (2019) · Developmental Psychology · doi:10.1037/dev0000807 · Cited by 59
“It has been assumed that children learn about social norms through interacting with the other members of their culture (Piaget, 1932; Tomasello, 2016).”
BackgroundSelf-citationMoral progress: Recent developments
Sauer, H., Blunden, C., Eriksen, C. L., & Rehren, P. (2021) · Philosophy Compass · doi:10.1111/phc3.12769 · Cited by 67
The Development of Prosocial Emotions
Vaish, A., & Hepach, R. (2019) · Emotion Review · doi:10.1177/1754073919885014 · Cited by 60
“It is likely in the larger group context—where relationships with nonkin are based on mutually beneficial, reciprocal interactions guided by principles of fairness and where we must be more vigilant about finding and keeping trustworthy partners—that we rely more heavily on complex prosocial emotions such as gratitude…”
BackgroundInfluentialBonobos engage in joint commitment
Heesen, R., Bangerter, A., Zuberbühler, K., Rossano, F., Iglesias, K., Guéry, J., & Genty, É. (2020) · Science Advances · doi:10.1126/sciadv.abd1306 · Cited by 56
Mechanisms of Techno-Moral Change: A Taxonomy and Overview
Danaher, J., & Sætra, H. S. (2023) · Ethical Theory and Moral Practice · doi:10.1007/s10677-023-10397-x · Cited by 56
“According to Michael Tomasello’s theory of moral origins, collaborative activity of this sort is the basis for our modern moral psychology (Tomasello 2016).”
BackgroundPhilosophy for Public Health and Public Policy
Wilson, J. (2021) · doi:10.1093/oso/9780192844057.001.0001 · Cited by 56
Short-sighted greed? Focusing on the future promotes reputation-based generosity
Sjåstad, H. (2019) · Judgment and Decision Making · doi:10.1017/s1930297500003430 · Cited by 53
A Developmental Perspective on the Origins of Morality in Infancy and Early Childhood
Dahl, A., & Killen, M. (2018) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01736 · Cited by 54
“Group affiliation is necessary for human survival (Tomasello, 2016).”
The Science of Early Moral Development: on Defining, Constructing, and Studying Morality from Birth
Dahl, A. (2018) · Advances in child development and behavior · doi:10.1016/bs.acdb.2018.11.001 · Cited by 63
Tragic Choices and the Virtue of Techno-Responsibility Gaps
Danaher, J. (2022) · Philosophy & Technology · doi:10.1007/s13347-022-00519-1 · Cited by 53
“According to several theories of the psychological and cultural origins of morality, practices of responsibility and punishment have played a central role in the emergence of the human moral conscience (Boehm 2012; Tomasello 2016; Wrangham 2019).”
BackgroundTechnology and moral change: the transformation of truth and trust
Danaher, J., & Sætra, H. S. (2022) · Ethics and Information Technology · doi:10.1007/s10676-022-09661-y · Cited by 76
Our better nature: Does resource stress predict beyond-household sharing?
Ember, C. R., Skoggard, I. A., Ringen, E. J., & Farrer, M. (2018) · Evolution and Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2018.03.001 · Cited by 53
The Role of Epistemic Trust in Mentalization-Based Treatment of Borderline Psychopathology
Nolte, T., Hutsebaut, J., Sharp, C., Campbell, C., Fonagy, P., & BATEMAN, A. W. (2023) · Journal of Personality Disorders · doi:10.1521/pedi.2023.37.5.633 · Cited by 62
“The result is a form of social cognition known as "we-mode" or "we-ness" which is processed within the therapeutic relationship as "us" rather than "self" and "other" (Gallotti & Frith, 2013; O’Madagain & Tomasello, 2019; M. Tomasello, 2016) (see Fig.”
Toolmaking and the evolution of normative cognition
Birch, J. (2021) · Biology & Philosophy · doi:10.1007/s10539-020-09777-9 · Cited by 69
“On this hypothesis, normative cognition evolved, as Tomasello (2016, 2020) and Baumard (2010) have also suggested, in the context of skilful mutualistic cooperation.”
BackgroundCompeting for love: Applying sexual economics theory to mating contests
Baumeister, R., Reynolds, T. A., Winegard, B. M., & Vohs, K. (2017) · Journal of Economic Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.joep.2017.07.009 · Cited by 40
“Tomasello (2016) reviewed evidence of cooperative prosociality among nonhuman primates and concluded that early cooperation is mainly for purposes of physical combat, and therefore males tend to be more social than females.”
BackgroundHow we learn social norms: a three-stage model for social norm learning
Zhang, W., Liu, Y., Dong, Y., He, W., Yao, S., Xu, Z., & Mu, Y. (2023) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1153809 · Cited by 73
“Considering the importance of social norm learning to human social development, such as children’s psychological well-being and social interaction in the future (Killen and Smetana, 2015; Tomasello, 2016), it is suggested that future studies may collect longitudinal data at different stages of childhood development to…”
BackgroundBecoming us and them: Social learning and intergroup bias
Over, H., & McCall, C. (2018) · Social and Personality Psychology Compass · doi:10.1111/spc3.12384 · Cited by 45
Binding moral values gain importance in the presence of close others
Yudkin, D. A., Gantman, A. P., Hofmann, W., & Quoidbach, J. (2021) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-021-22566-6 · Cited by 47
Remembering: Epistemic and Empirical
Craver, C. F. (2020) · Review of Philosophy and Psychology · doi:10.1007/s13164-020-00469-7 · Cited by 50
“I will not pretend to tell it (see Jablonka 2017; Tomasello 2014, 2016).”
BackgroundMoral Reasoning: Theory and Research in Developmental Science
Dahl, A., & Killen, M. (2018) · Wiley eBooks · doi:10.1002/9781119170174.epcn410 · Cited by 51
Culture, morality and individual differences: comparability and incomparability across species
Saucier, G. (2018) · Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rstb.2017.0170 · Cited by 46
Rizzo, M. T., Green, E. R., Dunham, Y. C., Bruneau, E., & Rhodes, M. (2021) · Developmental Science · doi:10.1111/desc.13170 · Cited by 44
Children's Acquisition and Application of Norms
Schmidt, M. F. H., & Hannes Rakoczy, B. (2023) · Annual Review of Developmental Psychology · doi:10.1146/annurev-devpsych-120621-034731 · Cited by 49
Learning from moral inconsistency
Campbell, R. (2017) · Cognition · doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2017.05.006 · Cited by 45
“The same may be true of the related capacity to treat in-group members as equals (Tomasello, 2016).”
Empathy, Altruism, and Group Identification
Miyazono, K., & Inarimori, K. (2021) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2021.749315 · Cited by 49
“…is egoistic or altruistic according to the group identification interpretation 10 Alternatively, Reynie’s stance toward Elaine is second-personal (Darwall, 2009; Tomasello, 2016); for Reynie, Elaine’s welfare is something second-personal (your welfare) rather than third-personal (her welfare).”
BackgroundNew Beginnings: An Interactionist and Constructivist Approach to Early Moral Development
Dahl, A. (2018) · Human Development · doi:10.1159/000492801 · Cited by 43
“What leads children to start perceiving actions in terms of right and wrong based on moral concerns with welfare and rights? Few theoretical proposals and little research have sought to explain this major transformation in early moral development [Dahl et al., 2018b; Piaget, 1965; Schmidt & Rakoczy, in press; Tomasell…”
BackgroundInfluentialMonroe, A. E., Dillon, K. D., Guglielmo, S., & Baumeister, R. F. (2018) · Journal of Experimental Social Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2018.03.010 · Cited by 45
“Tomasello (2016) proposed that morality began with dyadic concern and mutual obligation and only gradually superimposed cultural morals based on abstract principles on top of what he calls “second-person morality”.”
BackgroundMarket exposure and human morality
Enke, B. (2022) · Nature Human Behaviour · doi:10.1038/s41562-022-01480-x · Cited by 52
The role of the lie in the evolution of human language
Dor, D. (2017) · Language Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.langsci.2017.01.001 · Cited by 41
“…to constrain the option of lying: human societies and individuals becamemore co-operative andmorally-aware already before the emergence of language (Tomasello, 2008, 2009, 2016); honest communication was ensured by conformist learning and moralistic enforcement of norms by punishment (Richerson…”
BackgroundTactful animals: How the study of touch can inform the animal morality debate
Monsó, S., & Wrage, B. (2021) · Philosophical Psychology · doi:10.1080/09515089.2020.1859100 · Cited by 41
“Moral societies are generally regarded as ones in which individuals do not merely pursue their own selfish desires, but rather decide to cooperate and look out for others’ interests too (e.g., Tomasello, 2016).”
What We Do When We Define Morality (and Why We Need to Do It)
Dahl, A. (2023) · Psychological Inquiry · doi:10.1080/1047840x.2023.2248854 · Cited by 47
“Still, chimpanzees do not generally react negatively when they observe unrelated individuals hitting each other (third person, Silk & House, 2011; Tomasello, 2016).”
BackgroundIV—Emotionless Animals? Constructionist Theories of Emotion Beyond the Human Case
Birch, J. (2024) · Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society (Hardback) · doi:10.1093/arisoc/aoae003 · Cited by 41
Intuition and Deliberation in the Stag Hunt Game
Belloc, M., Bilancini, E., Boncinelli, L., & D’Alessandro, S. (2019) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-019-50556-8 · Cited by 43
Bianchin, M., & Heylighen, A. (2018) · Design Studies · doi:10.1016/j.destud.2017.10.001 · Cited by 44
Eighteen‐Month‐Old Infants Correct Non‐Conforming Actions by Others
Schmidt, M. F. H., Hannes Rakoczy, B., & Tomasello, M. (2019) · Infancy · doi:10.1111/infa.12292 · Cited by 39
“From early on, human children are both motivated and culturally expected to learn not only specific, individual forms of behavior, but rather general forms of conduct—social norms— that apply to any competent cultural agent (Rakoczy & Schmidt, 2013; Schmidt & Rakoczy, 2019; Tomasello, 2016).”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialSelf-citationThick Concepts and Sociological Research
Abend, G. (2019) · Sociological Theory · doi:10.1177/0735275119869979 · Cited by 41
Deontological and Altruistic Guilt Feelings: A Dualistic Thesis
Mancini, F., & Gangemi, A. (2021) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2021.651937 · Cited by 40
“The altruistic sense of guilt, and more generally altruistic morality, could derive from the care-giving motivation, as suggested, for example, by Tomasello (2016), whereas deontological guilt, and deontological morality, could derive, by way of processes of exaptation, from disgust.”
BackgroundBuchanan, A. E. (2020) · The MIT Press eBooks · doi:10.7551/mitpress/12826.001.0001 · Cited by 41
Deep Brain Stimulation, Authenticity and Value
Nyholm, S., & O'neill, E. (2017) · Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics · doi:10.1017/s0963180117000159 · Cited by 39
“22 Interactions with others are made possible by shared values governing how such interactions should proceed.”
Identifying psychological features of robots that encourage and discourage trust
Plaks, J. E., Rodriguez, L. B., & Ayad, R. (2022) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.chb.2022.107301 · Cited by 38
Baumeister, R. F., Maranges, H. M., & Sjåstad, H. (2018) · PsyArXiv (OSF Preprints) · doi:10.31234/osf.io/a3r7h · Cited by 38
Moral Foundations and Voluntary Public Good Provision: The Case of Climate Change
Welsch, H. (2020) · Ecological Economics · doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2020.106696 · Cited by 37
“With respect to the social patterns or situations that trigger the various MFs, it can be noted that human morality as such emerged as a response to the challenge of free riding on public goods (Graham et al. 2011, Haidt 2012, Tomasello 2016).”
How social status influences our understanding of others’ mental states
Rizzo, M. T., & Killen, M. (2018) · Journal of Experimental Child Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jecp.2017.12.008 · Cited by 39
Constraints on Conventions: Resolving Two Puzzles of Conventionality
Dahl, A., & Waltzer, T. (2019) · Cognition · doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2019.104152 · Cited by 33
“Once adopted, conventions affect the welfare of individuals and the functioning of social groups, and their violations elicit negative reactions from children and adults (Hardecker, Schmidt, Roden, & Tomasello, 2016; Rakoczy, Warneken, & Tomasello, 2008; Turiel, 2008b).”
BackgroundThe Virtues of Joint Production: Ethical Foundations for Collaborative Organizations
Bernacchio, C., Foss, N. J., & Lindenberg, S. M. (2022) · Academy of Management Review · doi:10.5465/amr.2019.0389 · Cited by 37
Evidence of joint commitment in great apes' natural joint actions
Heesen, R., Zuberbühler, K., Bangerter, A., Iglesias, K., Rossano, F., Pajot, A., Guéry, J., & Genty, É. (2021) · Royal Society Open Science · doi:10.1098/rsos.211121 · Cited by 36
“Although more evidence will be needed to assess the underlying cognitive abilities involved in those visible patterns of resumptions and sequencing of actions, these new findings show that some aspects of the structure of joint action coordination appear to be shared among Homo and Pan [34].”
BackgroundSurvivor guilt: Theoretical, empirical, and clinical features
Fimiani, R., Gazzillo, F., Dazzi, N., & Bush, M. (2021) · International Forum of Psychoanalysis · doi:10.1080/0803706x.2021.1941246 · Cited by 41
“Guilt, with its reparative focus, is a powerful motivator for prosocial behaviors, such as helping, cooperating, and sharing (Malti et al., 2016; Tangney & Dearing, 2002; Vaish, Carpenter, & Tomasello, 2016).”
BackgroundAnimal morality: What is the debate about?
Fitzpatrick, S. (2017) · Biology & Philosophy · doi:10.1007/s10539-017-9599-6 · Cited by 37
Mentalizing and Group Psychotherapy: A Novel Treatment for Antisocial Personality Disorder
BATEMAN, A. W. (2021) · American Journal of Psychotherapy · doi:10.1176/appi.psychotherapy.20210023 · Cited by 34
El mapa de los valores del Aprendizaje-Servicio
Martín-Garcia, X., Bär, B., Casares, M. G., et al. (2020) · Alteridad · doi:10.17163/alt.v16n1.2021.01 · Cited by 34
From imitation to implementation: How two‐ and three‐year‐old children learn to enforce social norms
Hardecker, S., & Tomasello, M. (2016) · British Journal of Developmental Psychology · doi:10.1111/bjdp.12159 · Cited by 39
Self-citationMoral identity in cultural context: Differences between Canadian and Chinese university students
Jia, F., Krettenauer, T., & Li, L. (2018) · Journal of Moral Education · doi:10.1080/03057240.2018.1499504 · Cited by 37
“These moral values likely originate from social interactions in close social relationships (caring for others and collaborating with others in dyadic or triadic relationships) but do not presuppose larger cultural group contexts (cf. Tomasello, 2016).”
BackgroundFuture-Orientation (as Trait and State) Promotes Reputation-Protective Choice in Moral Dilemmas
Vonasch, A. J., & Sjåstad, H. (2020) · Social Psychological and Personality Science · doi:10.1177/1948550619899257 · Cited by 31
“Until recently in history, being ostracized and excluded from the tribe meant nearcertain death (Tomasello, 2016; Von Hippel, 2018).”
BackgroundCoordinating social action: a primer for the cross-species investigation of communicative repair
Heesen, R., Fröhlich, M., Sievers, C., Woensdregt, M., & Dingemanse, M. (2022) · Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rstb.2021.0110 · Cited by 33
“The cognitive and psychological requirements for interactive repair seem to go beyond turn-taking and intentionality, and notably include the ability to prompt others for self-repair, which ultimately may also require some form of perspective taking [117,118].”
BackgroundHuman and nonhuman norms: a dimensional framework
Andrews, K., Fitzpatrick, S., & Westra, E. (2024) · Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rstb.2023.0026 · Cited by 32
“According to Tomasello ’ s [35] account of the ontogeny of norms, it is during episodes of joint goal pursuit that children begin to develop a sense of social obligation, based on the motivation to play their part in collective actions.”
BackgroundInfluentialThe origins of morality: Social equality, fairness, and justice
Killen, M. (2018) · Philosophical Psychology · doi:10.1080/09515089.2018.1486612 · Cited by 31
“A wealth of data from both evolutionary accounts (Tomasello, 2015) and social-cognitive developmental accounts (Killen & Smetana, 2015; Smetana et al.”
BackgroundWhy and How Did Narrative Fictions Evolve? Fictions as Entertainment Technologies
Dubourg, E., & Baumard, N. (2022) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2022.786770 · Cited by 32
Metadata
- Authors
- Tomasello, M.
- Affiliations
- Max Planck Society (DE)
- Corresponding author
- Tomasello, Michael
- ORCID
- Tomasello, Michael
- Venue
- Harvard University Press eBooks
- Publisher
- Harvard University Press
- Published
- 2016-12-31
- OpenAlex
- W791834320
- Cited by
- 924
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 71 · 2025: 78 · 2024: 95 · 2023: 94 · 2022: 117 · 2021: 151 · 2020: 88 · 2019: 89 · 2018: 65 · 2017: 63 · 2016: 11
- FWCI
- 39.50
- Type
- book
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Harvard University Press eBooks (publishedVersion)
- Max Planck Digital Library (submittedVersion)
- MPG.PuRe (Max Planck Society) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Child and Animal Learning Development
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Evolutionary Psychology and Human Behavior
- Keywords
- human morality, moral psychology, evolution of morality, great apes, children, cooperation, social cognition, comparative psychology
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review