Cited by 72DNA Repair MechanismsBacterial Genetics and BiotechnologyGenomics and Chromatin Dynamics

TopBP1 and DNA polymerase alpha-mediated recruitment of the 9-1-1 complex to stalled replication forks: implications for a replication restart-based mechanism for ATR checkpoint activation

Open access
Yan, Shan, Michael, W. Matthew·2009·Cell Cycle

Abstract

Upon sensing DNA damage or replication stress, cells trigger checkpoint response pathways that control cell cycle progression and maintain genomic stability. A variety of DNA lesions can activate the ATR (ATM and Rad3-related) protein kinase, which phosphorylates its critical substrate Chk1 to relay the checkpoint signal. ATR activation requires several factors, including the BRCT repeat-containing TopBP1 protein and the 9-1-1 clamp protein. Here, we summarize recent advances in understanding the multiple roles played by TopBP1 in ATR activation at stalled replication forks. We review recent studies showing that TopBP1 controls the loading of 9-1-1 onto stalled replication forks via a pathway that also requires DNA polymerase alpha (pol alpha). Based on these recent studies, we present a revised model for ATR activation, and speculate that TopBP1-mediated recruitment of pol alpha and 9-1-1 may couple checkpoint activation to replication restart, when DNA synthesis is blocked on the leading strand of a replication fork. Lastly, we present a new experiment that examines how TopBP1 binds to stalled replication forks, and we identify important new questions that our recent studies have raised regarding how stalled replication forks are sensed by the ATR checkpoint pathway.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.4161/cc.8.18.9485

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 32

  1. Hashimoto Y, Tsujimura T, Sugino A, Takisawa H. The phosphorylated C-terminal domain of Xenopus Cut5 directly mediates ATR-dependent activation of Chk1. Genes Cells 2006; 11:993-1007.
  2. Yamane K, Tsuruo T. Conserved BRCT regions of TopBP1 and of the tumor suppressor BRCA1 bind strand breaks and termini of DNA. Oncogene 1999; 18:5194-203.
  3. Choi JH, Lindsey-Boltz LA, Sancar A. Reconstitution of a human ATR-mediated checkpoint response to damaged DNA. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2007; 104:13301-6.
  4. Collins KL, Kelly TJ. Effects of T antigen and repli- cation protein A on the initiation of DNA synthesis by DNA polymerase alpha-primase. Mol Cell Biol 1991; 11:2108-15.
  5. Kumagai A, Lee J, Yoo HY, Dunphy WG. TopBP1 activates the ATR-ATRIP complex. Cell 2006; 124:943-55.
  6. Mordes DA, Glick GG, Zhao R, Cortez D. TopBP1 activates ATR through ATRIP and a PIKK regula- tory domain. Genes Dev 2008; 22:1478-89.
  7. Furuya K, Poitelea M, Guo L, Caspari T, Carr AM. Chk1 activation requires Rad9 S/TQ-site phospho- rylation to promote association with C-terminal BRCT domains of Rad4TOPBP1. Genes Dev 2004; 18:1154-64.
  8. Lee J, Kumagai A, Dunphy WG. The Rad9-Hus1- Rad1 checkpoint clamp regulates interaction of TopBP1 with ATR. J Biol Chem 2007; 282:28036- 44.
  9. Delacroix S, Wagner JM, Kobayashi M, Yamamoto K, Karnitz LM. The Rad9-Hus1-Rad1 (9-1-1) clamp activates checkpoint signaling via TopBP1. Genes Dev 2007; 21:1472-7.
  10. Bermudez VP, Lindsey-Boltz LA, Cesare AJ, Maniwa Y, Griffith JD, Hurwitz J, et al. Loading of the human 9-1-1 checkpoint complex onto DNA by the checkpoint clamp loader hRad17-replication factor C complex in vitro. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2003; 100:1633-8.
  11. Ellison V, Stillman B. Biochemical characterization of DNA damage checkpoint complexes: clamp loader and clamp complexes with specificity for 5' recessed DNA. PLoS Biol 2003; 1:33.
  12. Majka J, Binz SK, Wold MS, Burgers PM. Replication protein A directs loading of the DNA damage check- point clamp to 5'-DNA junctions. J Biol Chem 2006; 281:27855-61.
  13. Muzi-Falconi M, Giannattasio M, Foiani M, Plevani P. The DNA polymerase alpha-primase complex: multiple functions and interactions. ScientificWorldJournal 2003; 3:21-33.
  14. Michael WM, Ott R, Fanning E, Newport J. Activation of the DNA replication checkpoint through RNA synthesis by primase. Science 2000; 289:2133-7.
  15. You Z, Kong L, Newport J. The role of single- stranded DNA and polymerase alpha in establishing the ATR, Hus1 DNA replication checkpoint. J Biol Chem 2002; 277:27088-93.
  16. Yan S, Michael WM. TopBP1 and DNA polymerase- alpha directly recruit the 9-1-1 complex to stalled DNA replication forks. J Cell Bio 2009; 184:793- 804.
  17. Yan S, Lindsay HD, Michael WM. Direct require- ment for Xmus101 in ATR-mediated phosphoryla- tion of Claspin bound Chk1 during checkpoint signaling. J Cell Biol 2006; 173:181-6.
  18. Yoo HY, Kumagai A, Shevchenko A, Shevchenko A, Dunphy WG. Ataxia-telangiectasia mutated (ATM)- dependent activation of ATR occurs through phos- phorylation of TopBP1 by ATM. J Biol Chem 2007; 282:17501-6.
  19. Heller RC, Marians KJ. Replisome assembly and the direct restart of stalled replication forks. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 2006; 7:932-43.
  20. Lehmann AR, Fuchs RP. Gaps and Forks in DNA replication: Rediscovering old models. DNA Repair (Amst) 2006; 5:1495-8.
  21. Holway AH, Kim SH, La Volpe A, Michael WM. Checkpoint silencing during the DNA damage response in Caenorhabditis elegans embryos. J Cell Biol 2006; 172:999-1008.
  22. Van Hatten RA, Tutter AV, Holway AH, Khederian AM, Walter JC, Michael WM. The Xenopus Xmus101 protein is required for the recruitment of Cdc45 to origins of DNA replication. J Cell Biol 2002; 159:541-7.
  23. Hashimoto Y, Takisawa H. Xenopus Cut5 is essential for a CDK-dependent process in the initiation of DNA replication. EMBO J 2003; 22:2526-35. References
  24. Harper JW, Elledge SJ. The DNA damage response: ten years after. Mol Cell 2007; 28:739-45.
  25. Cimprich KA, Cortez D. ATR: an essential regulator of genome integrity. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 2008; 9:616-27.
  26. Shiotani B, Zou L. ATR signaling at a glance. J Cell Sci 2009; 122:301-4.
  27. Cortez D, Guntuku S, Qin J, Elledge SJ. ATR and ATRIP: partners in checkpoint signaling. Science 2001; 294:1713-6.
  28. Zou L, Elledge SJ. Sensing DNA damage through ATRIP recognition of RPA-ssDNA complexes. Science 2003; 300:1542-8.
  29. Byun TS, Pacek M, Yee MC, Walter JC, Cimprich KA. Functional uncoupling of MCM helicase and DNA polymerase activities activates the ATR- dependent checkpoint. Genes Dev 2005; 19:1040- 52.
  30. Parrilla-Castellar ER, Arlander SJ, Karnitz L. Dial 9-1-1 for DNA Damage: the Rad9-Hus1-Rad1 (9-1- 1) clamp complex. DNA Repair 2004; 3:1009-14.
  31. Yamane K, Kawabata M, Tsuruo T. A DNA- topoisomerase-II-binding protein with eight repeat- ing regions similar to DNA-repair enzymes and to a cell cycle regulator. Eur J Biochem 1997; 250:794-9.
  32. Garcia V, Furuya K, Carr AM. Identification and functional analysis of TopBP1 and its homologs. DNA Repair (Amst) 2005; 4:1227-39.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Yan, S., & Michael, W. M.
Affiliations
Harvard University (US)
Corresponding author
Michael, W. Matthew
Venue
Cell Cycle
Published
2009-09-15
Volume
8
Issue
18
Pages
2877-2884
ISSN
  • 1538-4101 (ISSN-L)
  • 1551-4005
OpenAlex
W2038245737
Cited by
72
References
0
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 8 · 2012: 4
FWCI
0.33
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Cell Cycle (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health
  • National Institute of General Medical Sciences (GM 067735, R01GM067735)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › DNA Repair Mechanisms
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Bacterial Genetics and Biotechnology
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Genomics and Chromatin Dynamics
Keywords
TopBP1, DNA polymerase alpha, stalled replication forks, replication restart, replication stress, DNA damage response, Chk1 phosphorylation, BRCT domain, checkpoint signaling
MeSH terms
Animals, Carrier Proteins, DNA Polymerase I, DNA Replication, DNA-Binding Proteins, Humans, Nuclear Proteins, Nucleic Acid Conformation, Protein Serine-Threonine Kinases, Cell Cycle Proteins, Ataxia Telangiectasia Mutated Proteins

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review