Cited by 106Genomics and Chromatin DynamicsRNA Research and SplicingNuclear Structure and Function

Nucleosomes are preferentially positioned at exons in somatic and sperm cells

Open access
Nahkuri, Satu, Taft, Ryan J., Mattick, John S.·2009·Cell Cycle

Abstract

Nucleosome positioning is constrained at eukaryotic transcription start sites and implicated in transcriptional regulation. Moreover, recent observations indicate that chromatin structure, transcription and splicing are functionally intertwined, and that modified nucleosomes with trimethylation of lysine 36 in histone subunit 3 (H3K36me3) are enriched at internal exons and the downstream flanking intronic regions of highly expressed genes. However, the position of nucleosomes in the interior of genes has been thought to be largely random. Here we show, by analysis of data sets from human sperm and T cells and medaka (Japanese killifish, Oryzias latipes) blastulae, that internal exons of genes are characterized by sharply elevated average nucleosome occupancy in comparison to flanking intronic sequences. We also show that the preferential positioning of nucleosomes at internal exons is independent of their modification status, and of the GC content, conservation or the expression level of the exon. These findings show that the location of exons is recorded in the chromatin structure and may be inherited across generations. Such embedded information may underpin transcriptionally coupled exon recognition and splice site selection.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.4161/cc.8.20.9916

Cites

30 of 30 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Increased nucleosome occupancy occurs on exons with respect to introns.

    “First, increased nucleosome occupancy occurs on exons with respect to introns (Andersson et al, 2009; Nahkuri et al, 2009; Schwartz et al, 2009; Spies et al, 2009; Tilgner et al, 2009; Chodavarapu et al, 2010).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

2 of the 32 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Nahkuri, S., Taft, R. J., & Mattick, J. S.
Affiliations
The University of Queensland (AU)
Corresponding author
Mattick, John S.
Venue
Cell Cycle
Published
2009-10-15
Volume
8
Issue
20
Pages
3420-3424
ISSN
  • 1538-4101 (ISSN-L)
  • 1551-4005
OpenAlex
W1972439760
Cited by
106
References
32
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 6 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 6 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 12
FWCI
7.78
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by-nc
Locations
  • Cell Cycle (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • University of Queensland
  • Suomen Kulttuurirahasto
  • Queensland Government
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Genomics and Chromatin Dynamics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › RNA Research and Splicing
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Nuclear Structure and Function
Keywords
nucleosome positioning, introns, nucleosome occupancy, chromatin structure, transcription start sites, T cells, exon recognition, splice site selection, GC content
MeSH terms
Animals, Chromatin, Exons, Histones, Humans, Male, Nucleosomes, Oryzias, Spermatozoa, T-Lymphocytes, RNA Splice Sites

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review