The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Discovery of cross-reactive probes and polymorphic CpGs in the Illumina Infinium HumanMethylation450 microarray
Open accessAbstract
DNA methylation, an important type of epigenetic modification in humans, participates in crucial cellular processes, such as embryonic development, X-inactivation, genomic imprinting and chromosome stability. Several platforms have been developed to study genome-wide DNA methylation. Many investigators in the field have chosen the Illumina Infinium HumanMethylation microarray for its ability to reliably assess DNA methylation following sodium bisulfite conversion. Here, we analyzed methylation profiles of 489 adult males and 357 adult females generated by the Infinium HumanMethylation450 microarray. Among the autosomal CpG sites that displayed significant methylation differences between the two sexes, we observed a significant enrichment of cross-reactive probes co-hybridizing to the sex chromosomes with more than 94% sequence identity. This could lead investigators to mistakenly infer the existence of significant autosomal sex-associated methylation. Using sequence identity cutoffs derived from the sex methylation analysis, we concluded that 6% of the array probes can potentially generate spurious signals because of co-hybridization to alternate genomic sequences highly homologous to the intended targets. Additionally, we discovered probes targeting polymorphic CpGs that overlapped SNPs. The methylation levels detected by these probes are simply the reflection of underlying genetic polymorphisms but could be misinterpreted as true signals. The existence of probes that are cross-reactive or of target polymorphic CpGs in the Illumina HumanMethylation microarrays can confound data obtained from such microarrays. Therefore, investigators should exercise caution when significant biological associations are found using these array platforms. A list of all cross-reactive probes and polymorphic CpGs identified by us are annotated in this paper.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
<tt>BLAT</tt> —The <tt>BLAST</tt> -Like Alignment Tool
Kent, W. J. (2002) · Genome Research · doi:10.1101/gr.229202 · Cited by 8,480
A map of human genome variation from population-scale sequencing.
The 1000 Genomes Project Consortium (2010) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature09534 · Cited by 7,877
Jaenisch, R., & Bird, A. (2003) · Nature Genetics · doi:10.1038/ng1089 · Cited by 6,325
Genome-wide association scan identifies a colorectal cancer susceptibility locus on chromosome 8q24
Zanke, B. W., Greenwood, C. M., Rangrej, J., Kustra, R., Tenesa, A., Farrington, S. M., Prendergast, J., Olschwang, S., Chiang, T., Crowdy, E., et al. (2007) · Nature Genetics · doi:10.1038/ng2089 · Cited by 724
Self-citationDNA methylation signatures in development and aging of the human prefrontal cortex
Numata, S., Ye, T., Hyde, T. M., Guitart-Navarro, X., Tao, R., Wininger, M., Colantuoni, C., Weinberger, D. R., Kleinman, J. E., & Lipska, B. K. (2012) · The American Journal of Human Genetics · doi:10.1016/j.ajhg.2011.12.020 · Cited by 364
Cited by
Orienting the causal relationship between imprecisely measured traits using GWAS summary data.
Hemani, G., Tilling, K., & Davey Smith, G. (2017) · PLoS Genetics · doi:10.1371/journal.pgen.1007081 · Cited by 2,607
Pidsley, R., Zotenko, E., Peters, T. J., Lawrence, M. G., Risbridger, G. P., Molloy, P., Van Djik, S., Muhlhausler, B., Stirzaker, C., & Clark, S. J. (2016) · Genome biology · doi:10.1186/s13059-016-1066-1 · Cited by 1,480
Alzheimer's disease: early alterations in brain DNA methylation at ANK1, BIN1, RHBDF2 and other loci
De Jager, P. L., Srivastava, G., Lunnon, K., Burgess, J., Schalkwyk, L. C., Yu, L., Eaton, M. L., Keenan, B. T., Ernst, J., McCabe, C., et al. (2014) · Nature Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nn.3786 · Cited by 956
“Many of these probes showed strong association to gender in a recent report that recommends discarding probes in which 47/50 nucleotides match the sex chromosome sequence during sequence alignment using BLAT 49 .”
InfluentialDNA methylation aging clocks: challenges and recommendations
Bell, C. G., Lowe, R., Adams, P. D., Baccarelli, A. A., Beck, S., Bell, J. T., Christensen, B. C., Gladyshev, V. N., Heijmans, B. T., Horvath, S., et al. (2019) · Genome Biology · doi:10.1186/s13059-019-1824-y · Cited by 1,025
Tsoi, J., Robert, L., Paraiso, K., Galvan, C., Sheu, K. M., Lay, J., Wong, D. J. L., Atefi, M., Shirazi, R., Wang, X., et al. (2018) · Cancer Cell · doi:10.1016/j.ccell.2018.03.017 · Cited by 938
Metadata
- Authors
- Chen, Y.-A., Lemire, M., Choufani, S., Butcher, D. T., Grafodatskaya, D., Zanke, B. W., Gallinger, S., Hudson, T. J., & Weksberg, R.
- Venue
- Epigenetics
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2013-02
- Volume
- 8
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 203-209
- ISSN
- 1559-2294 (ISSN-L)
- 1559-2308
- OpenAlex
- W1975528145
- Cited by
- 1,552
- References
- 5
- FWCI
- 37.65
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Discovery of cross-reactive probes and polymorphic CpGs in the Illumina Infinium HumanMethylation450 microarray. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.4161/epi.23470
- The paper
- Chen, Y.-A., Lemire, M., Choufani, S., Butcher, D. T., Grafodatskaya, D., Zanke, B. W., Gallinger, S., Hudson, T. J., & Weksberg, R. (2013). Discovery of cross-reactive probes and polymorphic CpGs in the Illumina Infinium HumanMethylation450 microarray. Epigenetics. https://doi.org/10.4161/epi.23470
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.