Cited by 23Hepatitis B Virus StudiesCeliac Disease Research and ManagementDiabetes and associated disorders

Normal or defective immune response to Hepatitis B vaccine in patients with diabetes and celiac disease: An open issue

Open access
Zanoni, Giovanna, Contreas, Giovanna, Valletta, Enrico, Gabrielli, Oretta, Mengoli, Carlo, Veneri, Dino·2015·Human Vaccines & Immunotherapeutics

Abstract

A defective production of protective levels of antibodies to Hepatitis B (HB) vaccine is reported to occur in 4-10% of healthy subjects and a correlation with the presence of specific human leukocyte antigen (HLA) molecules, including DQ2, which also confers genetic predisposition to celiac disease (CD) and type I diabetes mellitus (T1DM), has been suggested. The aim of this study was to analyze the serological response to HB vaccine and measles-containing vaccines in 69 diabetic patients (T1DM), 42 patients with celiac disease (CD) and 79 healthy control subjects (CT). The median interval between the third dose of HB vaccine and serum collection was 6.8, 3.5, and 4.7 years for T1DM, CD and CT groups, respectively. 50/69 (72%) T1DM patients, 32/42 (76%) CD patients and 61/79 (77%) CT subjects showed protective anti-HBs antibodies after vaccination, with no statistically significant difference. On the contrary, a lower statistically significant difference was found in the mean HBsAb level of T1DM subjects when compared with the other two groups. No correlation between HLA DQ2 expression in T1DM and vaccine response was detected. The comparison of serological response to measles after vaccination also showed no statistically significant differences in the three groups. Contrasting results between these data and those reported in the literature might be due to differences in the time intervals between vaccination and testing. Prospective studies in pathological and healthy groups with the same age at HBV vaccination and with the same time interval for blood sample collection to determine antibody titers are necessary in order to provide more conclusive data.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.4161/hv.34309

Cites

17 of 17 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Several studies detected no differences between coeliac disease children and controls in the immune response to poliomyelitis, diphtheria, mumps, pertussis, rubella, tetanus, haemophilus influenzae type b, and measles.

    “Several studies detected no differences between CD children and controls in the immune response to poliomyelitis, diphtheria, mumps, and pertussis (45), rubella, tetanus (45, 46), haemophilus influenzae type b (46) and measles (45, 47).”

    From ESPGHAN Position Paper on Management and Follow-up of Children and Adolescents With Celiac Disease. (2022) · cites this paper as [47]

    The Results report no statistically significant difference in measles antibody responses between children with coeliac disease and controls. The Discussion also reports normal responses to tetanus, rubella, and Haemophilus influenzae type b vaccines from other authors. Our copy does not report comparable findings for poliomyelitis, diphtheria, mumps, or pertussis. Page numbers were not provided. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. World Health Organization. Hepatitis B vac- cines. Wkly Epidemiol Rec 2009; 84:405-19; PMID:19817017

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Zanoni, G., Contreas, G., Valletta, E., Gabrielli, O., Mengoli, C., & Veneri, D.
Affiliations
  • University of Verona (IT)
  • Regional Center for Pediatric Diabetes; Azienda ULSS 20 of Verona; Italy
  • University of Padua (IT)
Corresponding author
Zanoni, Giovanna
Venue
Human Vaccines & Immunotherapeutics
Published
2014-11-01
Volume
11
Issue
1
Pages
58-62
ISSN
  • 2164-5515 (ISSN-L)
  • 2164-554X
OpenAlex
W2279360770
Cited by
23
References
17
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 2 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 3
FWCI
1.52
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Human Vaccines & Immunotherapeutics (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Hepatitis B Virus Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Gastroenterology › Celiac Disease Research and Management
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Diabetes and associated disorders
Keywords
hepatitis B vaccine, type 1 diabetes, celiac disease, anti-HBs antibody levels, measles vaccine, HLA-DQ2, HLA-DQ8, vaccine response, antibody persistence
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Antibodies, Viral, Celiac Disease, Child, Child, Preschool, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1, Female, HLA-DQ Antigens, Humans, Infant, Male, Measles Vaccine, Retrospective Studies, Hepatitis B Vaccines, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review