Cited by 84Celiac Disease Research and ManagementHepatitis B Virus StudiesVaccine Coverage and Hesitancy

Failure to Respond to Hepatitis B Vaccine in Children With Celiac Disease

Park, Seung‐Dae, Markowitz, James, Pettei, Michael, Weinstein, Toba, Sison, Cristina P, Swiss, Steven R, Levine, Jeremiah·2007·Journal of Pediatric Gastroenterology and Nutrition

Abstract

Objectives To determine whether children with celiac disease (CD) fail to show a response to hepatitis B virus (HBV) vaccine more frequently than children without CD. Patients and methods This was a prospective study that compared the response to HBV, tetanus, rubella, and Haemophilus influenzae type b (Hib) vaccines between children with CD and age- and sex-matched control subjects. Results The study population included 26 patients with CD and 18 age- and sex-matched controls. All had received the full complement of childhood vaccinations. A significantly higher proportion of subjects in the CD group (14 of 26) failed to respond to HBV vaccine compared with controls (2 of 18; 53.9% vs 11.1%; P Conclusions More than 50% of children with CD do not show a response to standard vaccination regimens for HBV. Given the large number of children with CD throughout the world, this observation suggests that there is a large HBV-susceptible population despite widespread vaccination. Current immunization strategies may need to be reassessed to protect this population and achieve the goal of universal protection.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/mpg.0b013e3180320654

Cites

22 of 22 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Several studies detected no differences between coeliac disease children and controls in the immune response to poliomyelitis, diphtheria, mumps, pertussis, rubella, tetanus, haemophilus influenzae type b, and measles.

    “Several studies detected no differences between CD children and controls in the immune response to poliomyelitis, diphtheria, mumps, and pertussis (45), rubella, tetanus (45, 46), haemophilus influenzae type b (46) and measles (45, 47).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Park, S., Markowitz, J., Pettei, M., Weinstein, T., Sison, C. P., Swiss, S. R., & Levine, J.
Affiliations
Northwell Health (US)
Corresponding author
  • Park, Seung‐Dae
  • Markowitz, James
  • Pettei, Michael
  • Weinstein, Toba
  • Levine, Jeremiah
Venue
Journal of Pediatric Gastroenterology and Nutrition
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2007-04
Volume
44
Issue
4
Pages
431-435
ISSN
  • 0277-2116 (ISSN-L)
  • 1536-4801
OpenAlex
W2056449586
Cited by
84
References
22
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 8
FWCI
4.79
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Pediatric Gastroenterology and Nutrition (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Gastroenterology › Celiac Disease Research and Management
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Hepatitis B Virus Studies
  • Social Sciences › Health › Vaccine Coverage and Hesitancy
Keywords
celiac disease, hepatitis B vaccine, childhood immunization, tetanus vaccine, rubella vaccine, Haemophilus influenzae type b vaccine, hepatitis B surface antigen, antibody response, immunocompromised children
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Celiac Disease, Child, Child, Preschool, Female, Hepatitis B Surface Antigens, Humans, Male, Polysaccharides, Bacterial, Prospective Studies, Rubella Vaccine, Tetanus Toxin, Bacterial Capsules, Hepatitis B Vaccines, Haemophilus Vaccines

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review