Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 297

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Development of a metabolically active, non-replicating sporozoite vaccine to prevent Plasmodium falciparum malaria

Open access
Hoffman, Stephen L., Billingsley, Peter F., James, Eric, Richman, Adam, Loyevsky, Mark, Li, Tao, Chakravarty, Sumana, Gunasekera, Anusha, Chattopadhyay, Rana, Li, Minglin, Stafford, Richard, Ahumada, Adriana, Epstein, Judith E., Sedegah, Martha, Reyes, Sharina, Richie, Thomas L., Lyke, Kirsten E., Edelman, Robert, Laurens, Matthew, Plowe, Christopher V., Sim, B. Kim Lee·2010·Human Vaccines

Abstract

Immunization of volunteers by the bite of mosquitoes carrying radiation-attenuated Plasmodium falciparum sporozoites protects greater than 90% of such volunteers against malaria, if adequate numbers of immunizing biting sessions and sporozoite-infected mosquitoes are used. Nonetheless, until recently it was considered impossible to develop, license and commercialize a live, whole parasite P. falciparum sporozoite (PfSPZ) vaccine. In 2003 Sanaria scientists reappraised the potential impact of a metabolically active, non-replicating PfSPZ vaccine, and outlined the challenges to producing such a vaccine. Six years later, significant progress has been made in overcoming these challenges. This progress has enabled the manufacture and release of multiple clinical lots of a 1(st) generation metabolically active, non-replicating PfSPZ vaccine, the Sanaria PfSPZ Vaccine, submission of a successful Investigational New Drug application to the US Food and Drug Administration, and initiation of safety, immunogenicity and protective efficacy studies in volunteers in MD, US. Efforts are now focused on how best to achieve submission of a successful Biologics License Application and introduce the vaccine to the primary target population of African children in the shortest possible period of time. This will require implementation of a systematic, efficient clinical development plan. Short term challenges include optimizing the (1) efficiency and scale up of the manufacturing process and quality control assays, (2) dosage regimen and method of administration, (3) potency of the vaccine, and (4) logistics of delivering the vaccine to those who need it most, and finalizing the methods for vaccine stabilization and attenuation. A medium term goal is to design and build a facility for manufacturing highly potent and stable vaccine for pivotal Phase 3 studies and commercial launch.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.4161/hv.6.1.10396

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 297

Metadata

Authors
Hoffman, S. L., Billingsley, P. F., James, E., Richman, A., Loyevsky, M., Li, T., Chakravarty, S., Gunasekera, A., Chattopadhyay, R., Li, M., Stafford, R., Ahumada, A., Epstein, J. E., Sedegah, M., Reyes, S., Richie, T. L., Lyke, K. E., Edelman, R., Laurens, M., Plowe, C. V., & Sim, B. K. L.
Venue
Human Vaccines
Published
2010-01
Volume
6
Issue
1
Pages
97-106
ISSN
  • 1554-8600 (ISSN-L)
  • 1554-8619
OpenAlex
W1979427692
Cited by
297
References
0
FWCI
31.90
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
hybrid

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Development of a metabolically active, non-replicating sporozoite vaccine to prevent Plasmodium falciparum malaria. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.4161/hv.6.1.10396
The paper
Hoffman, S. L., Billingsley, P. F., James, E., Richman, A., Loyevsky, M., Li, T., Chakravarty, S., Gunasekera, A., Chattopadhyay, R., Li, M., Stafford, R., Ahumada, A., Epstein, J. E., Sedegah, M., Reyes, S., Richie, T. L., Lyke, K. E., Edelman, R., Laurens, M., . . . Sim, B. K. L. (2010). Development of a metabolically active, non-replicating sporozoite vaccine to prevent Plasmodium falciparum malaria. Human Vaccines. https://doi.org/10.4161/hv.6.1.10396

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.