CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 50

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Mugwort Pollen-Related Food Allergy: Lipid Transfer Protein Sensitization and Correlation With the Severity of Allergic Reactions in a Chinese Population

Deng, Shan, Yin, Jia·2019·Allergy, Asthma & Immunology Research
DOI 10.4168/aair.2019.11.1.116PMC PMC6267181
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.4168/aair.2019.11.1.116

Cites

Statistics

Figures

Fig. 1 Food sensitization in 107 individuals with mugwort pollen-related food allergy.
Fig. 1 Food sensitization in 107 individuals with mugwort pollen-related food allergy.CC BY-NC · PubMed Central
Fig. 2 Levels of total IgE and specific IgE to mugwort pollen, Art v 1 and Art v 3 were compared in FA (filled triangles, n = 107) and NFA (open circles, n = 41) patients. IgE, immunoglobulin E; FA, food-allergic; NFA, non-food-allergic.
Fig. 2 Levels of total IgE and specific IgE to mugwort pollen, Art v 1 and Art v 3 were compared in FA (filled triangles, n = 107) and NFA (open circles, n = 41) patients. IgE, immunoglobulin E; FA, food-allergic; NFA, non-food-allergic.CC BY-NC · PubMed Central
Fig. 3 Comparison of levels of total IgE and specific IgE to mugwort pollen, Art v 1 and Art v 3 in predicting mugwort pollen-related food allergy. Art v 3-specific IgE had the largest area under ROC curve (AUC, 0.757; 95% CI, 0.662–0.852; P < 0.001) with reference to total IgE (AUC, 0.479; 95% CI, 0.379–0.578; P = 0.689), specific IgE to mugwort pollen (AUC, 0.705; 95% CI, 0.620–0.789; P < 0.001) and Art v 1 (AUC, 0.495; 95% CI, 0.397–0.593; P = 0.925). IgE, immunoglobulin E; ROC, receiver operating characteristic; AUC, area under the curve; CI, confidence interval.
Fig. 3 Comparison of levels of total IgE and specific IgE to mugwort pollen, Art v 1 and Art v 3 in predicting mugwort pollen-related food allergy. Art v 3-specific IgE had the largest area under ROC curve (AUC, 0.757; 95% CI, 0.662–0.852; P < 0.001) with reference to total IgE (AUC, 0.479; 95% CI, 0.379–0.578; P = 0.689), specific IgE to mugwort pollen (AUC, 0.705; 95% CI, 0.620–0.789; P < 0.001) and Art v 1 (AUC, 0.495; 95% CI, 0.397–0.593; P = 0.925). IgE, immunoglobulin E; ROC, receiver operating characteristic; AUC, area under the curve; CI, confidence interval.CC BY-NC · PubMed Central
Fig. 4 IgE levels of LTP (Pru p 3, Ara h 9 and Cor a 8) were compared among food (peach, peanut and hazelnut, respectively)-allergic patients with systemic reactions and oral allergy syndrome. IgE, immunoglobulin E; LTP, lipid transfer protein.
Fig. 4 IgE levels of LTP (Pru p 3, Ara h 9 and Cor a 8) were compared among food (peach, peanut and hazelnut, respectively)-allergic patients with systemic reactions and oral allergy syndrome. IgE, immunoglobulin E; LTP, lipid transfer protein.CC BY-NC · PubMed Central
Fig. 5 ROC curve analysis for specific IgE to mugwort pollen, Art v 3, peach and its allergenic components in predicting systemic reactions to peach. Pru p 3-specific IgE had the largest area under ROC curve (AUC, 0.77; 95% CI, 0.676–0.872; P < 0.001) with reference to specific IgE to mugwort pollen (AUC, 0.57; 95% CI, 0.448–0.693; P = 0.271), Art v 3 (AUC, 0.55; 95% CI, 0.420–0.670; P = 0.483), peach (AUC, 0.73; 95% CI, 0.627–0.837; P < 0.001), Pru p 1 (AUC, 0.48; 95% CI, 0.347–0.604; P = 0.701), and Pru p 4 (AUC, 0.58; 95% CI, 0.457–0.708; P = 0.199). ROC, receiver operating characteristic; IgE, immunoglobulin E; AUC, area under the curve; CI, confidence interval.
Fig. 5 ROC curve analysis for specific IgE to mugwort pollen, Art v 3, peach and its allergenic components in predicting systemic reactions to peach. Pru p 3-specific IgE had the largest area under ROC curve (AUC, 0.77; 95% CI, 0.676–0.872; P < 0.001) with reference to specific IgE to mugwort pollen (AUC, 0.57; 95% CI, 0.448–0.693; P = 0.271), Art v 3 (AUC, 0.55; 95% CI, 0.420–0.670; P = 0.483), peach (AUC, 0.73; 95% CI, 0.627–0.837; P < 0.001), Pru p 1 (AUC, 0.48; 95% CI, 0.347–0.604; P = 0.701), and Pru p 4 (AUC, 0.58; 95% CI, 0.457–0.708; P = 0.199). ROC, receiver operating characteristic; IgE, immunoglobulin E; AUC, area under the curve; CI, confidence interval.CC BY-NC · PubMed Central
Fig. 6 Representative results of immunoblotting of peach extracts with sera from patients with mugwort pollen-related peach allergy. lane 1–6: serum from patients with systemic reactions to peach; lane 7–9: serum from patients with oral allergy syndrome; lane 10: serum from patients with mugwort pollinosis without food allergy.
Fig. 6 Representative results of immunoblotting of peach extracts with sera from patients with mugwort pollen-related peach allergy. lane 1–6: serum from patients with systemic reactions to peach; lane 7–9: serum from patients with oral allergy syndrome; lane 10: serum from patients with mugwort pollinosis without food allergy.CC BY-NC · PubMed Central

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 34

  1. Ye, 1991, Investigation of aeroborne allergenic pollens in different regions of China
  2. Popescu, 2015, World J Methodol, 5, 31, 10.5662/wjm.v5.i2.31 · DOI · Paper page
  3. Webber, 2010, Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol, 104, 101, 10.1016/j.anai.2009.11.007 · DOI
  4. Ballmer-Weber, 2002, Allergy, 57, 228, 10.1034/j.1398-9995.2002.1o3319.x · DOI
  5. Figueroa, 2005, Allergy, 60, 48, 10.1111/j.1398-9995.2005.00644.x · DOI
  6. Pastorello, 2002, J Allergy Clin Immunol, 110, 310, 10.1067/mai.2002.125830 · DOI
  7. Wen, 2002, Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi, 82, 626
  8. Egger, 2006, Allergy, 61, 461, 10.1111/j.1398-9995.2006.00994.x · DOI
  9. Ma, 2013, J Allergy Clin Immunol, 132, 764, 10.1016/j.jaci.2013.04.017 · DOI
  10. Fernández-Rivas, 2006, J Allergy Clin Immunol, 118, 481, 10.1016/j.jaci.2006.05.012 · DOI
  11. Sampson, 2006, Ann Emerg Med, 47, 373, 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2006.01.018 · DOI · Paper page
  12. Bousquet, 2012, Allergy, 67, 18, 10.1111/j.1398-9995.2011.02728.x · DOI · Paper page
  13. Pastorello, 1999, J Allergy Clin Immunol, 103, 520, 10.1016/S0091-6749(99)70480-X · DOI
  14. Flores, 2012, Int Arch Allergy Immunol, 159, 346, 10.1159/000338282 · DOI
  15. Geroldinger-Simic, 2011, J Allergy Clin Immunol, 127, 616, 10.1016/j.jaci.2010.10.027 · DOI
  16. Skypala, 2011, Clin Exp Allergy, 41, 1001, 10.1111/j.1365-2222.2011.03759.x · DOI
  17. Werfel, 2015, Allergy, 70, 1079, 10.1111/all.12666 · DOI · Paper page
  18. Gruber, 2009, Biol Chem, 390, 445, 10.1515/BC.2009.063 · DOI
  19. Gao, 2013, J Allergy Clin Immunol, 131, 224, 10.1016/j.jaci.2012.07.015 · DOI
  20. Lombardero, 2004, Clin Exp Allergy, 34, 1415, 10.1111/j.1365-2222.2004.02053.x · DOI
  21. García-Sellés, 2002, Int Arch Allergy Immunol, 128, 115, 10.1159/000059401 · DOI
  22. Palacín, 2006, J Allergy Clin Immunol, 117, 1423, 10.1016/j.jaci.2006.01.026 · DOI
  23. Mothes-Luksch, 2017, Allergy, 72, 1415, 10.1111/all.13151 · DOI
  24. Scala, 2015, Allergy, 70, 933, 10.1111/all.12635 · DOI
  25. Tolkki, 2013, J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract, 1, 623, 10.1016/j.jaip.2013.07.010 · DOI
  26. Datema, 2015, J Allergy Clin Immunol, 136, 382, 10.1016/j.jaci.2014.12.1949 · DOI
  27. Pascal, 2012, Clin Exp Allergy, 42, 1529, 10.1111/j.1365-2222.2012.04071.x · DOI
  28. Yin, 2005, Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi, 85, 1683
  29. Yin, 2006, Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi, 86, 1628
  30. Uasuf, 2015, Clin Mol Allergy, 13, 30, 10.1186/s12948-015-0035-7 · DOI
  31. Le, 2013, Int Arch Allergy Immunol, 160, 56, 10.1159/000339244 · DOI
  32. Scheurer, 2004, J Allergy Clin Immunol, 114, 900, 10.1016/j.jaci.2004.06.017 · DOI
  33. Offermann, 2016, J Biol Chem, 291, 15447, 10.1074/jbc.M116.733659 · DOI
  34. Ganglberger, 2000, Clin Exp Allergy, 30, 566, 10.1046/j.1365-2222.2000.00773.x · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 50

Metadata

Authors
Deng, S., & Yin, J.
Affiliations
Department of Allergy, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China.
Venue
Allergy, Asthma & Immunology Research
Publisher
The Korean Academy of Asthma, Allergy and Clinical Immunology and The Korean Academy of Pediatric Al
Published
2019
Volume
11
Issue
1
Pages
116
ISSN
  • 2092-7355
  • 2092-7363
DOI
10.4168/aair.2019.11.1.116
PMC
PMC6267181
Cited by
50
References
0
Language
en
Licence
creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (tdm)
Funders
Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences (2016-I2M-1-003)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Mugwort Pollen-Related Food Allergy: Lipid Transfer Protein Sensitization and Correlation With the Severity of Allergic Reactions in a Chinese Population. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.4168/aair.2019.11.1.116
The paper
Deng, S., & Yin, J. (2019). Mugwort Pollen-Related Food Allergy: Lipid Transfer Protein Sensitization and Correlation With the Severity of Allergic Reactions in a Chinese Population. Allergy, Asthma & Immunology Research. https://doi.org/10.4168/aair.2019.11.1.116