The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Current Knowledge in Synbiotic Use for Fish Aquaculture: A Review
Open accessAbstract
Synbiotics are nutritional supplements that combine probiotics and prebiotics, enhancing their beneficial effects.Nowadays, probiotics are also becoming an integral part of aquaculture practices to obtain high production, and, although considerably less information is available regarding probiotics applications for fish, they offer benefits with regards to improving immune status and fish production.Despite the promising potential benefits demonstrated in current literature to these feed ingredients, to date the use of synbiotics in fish farms has been poorly investigated and available data are still scarce.The parameters investigated in these studies have been the following: effect on survival and growth, feed conversion, body composition, haematological/biochemical parameters, digestive enzyme activity, immunological response and disease resistance.This review compiles the results from recent studies, aiming to highlight the properties of synbiotics evaluated for potential application in farming fish.Various factors as fish specie, time of feeding treatment and supplement dose as well as the type of prebiotics and probiotics can significantly affect the activity of synbiotics.Moreover, many aspects such as mechanism which mediate host benefits are poorly understood.Future studies are needed to provide a better knowledge and fully conclude on the effects of adding synbiotics in fish fed.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Prebiotics and probiotics; modifying and mining the microbiota
Quigley, E. M. M. (2010) · Pharmacological Research · doi:10.1016/j.phrs.2010.01.004 · Cited by 238 · cited 1×
“Several studies have demonstrated that patter recognition receptors [PRRs, such as toll-like receptors (TLRs)], signalling pathways, immune responses and the secretion of antimicrobial peptides such as defensins and chemokines by the epithelium play important roles in these mechanisms [24,25].”
BackgroundUnraveling Mechanisms of Action of Probiotics
Sherman, P. M., Ossa, J. C., & Johnson‐Henry, K. (2009) · Nutrition in Clinical Practice · doi:10.1177/0884533608329231 · Cited by 230
Cited by
The Gut Microbiota of Marine Fish
Egerton, S., Culloty, S., Whooley, J., Stanton, C., & Ross, R. P. (2018) · Frontiers in Microbiology · doi:10.3389/fmicb.2018.00873 · Cited by 963
Beneficial roles of feed additives as immunostimulants in aquaculture: a review
Dawood, M. A. O., Koshio, S., & Esteban, M. Á. (2018) · Reviews in Aquaculture · doi:10.1111/raq.12209 · Cited by 921
Llewellyn, M. S., Boutin, S., Hoseinifar, S. H., & Derome, N. (2014) · Frontiers in Microbiology · doi:10.3389/fmicb.2014.00207 · Cited by 745
Sustainable aquaculture requires environmental‐friendly treatment strategies for fish diseases
Lieke, T., Meinelt, T., Hoseinifar, S. H., Pan, B., Straus, D. L., & Steinberg, C. E. W. (2020) · Reviews in Aquaculture · doi:10.1111/raq.12365 · Cited by 363
Rohani, M. F., Islam, S. M., Hossain, M. K., Ferdous, Z., Siddik, M. A., Nuruzzaman, M., Padeniya, U., Brown, C., & Shahjahan, M. (2022) · Fish & Shellfish Immunology · doi:10.1016/j.fsi.2021.12.037 · Cited by 319
Metadata
- Authors
- Jose Meseguer, R. C.
- Venue
- Journal of Aquaculture Research & Development
- Publisher
- OMICS Publishing Group
- Published
- 2011
- Volume
- s1
- ISSN
- 2155-9546 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2158544063
- Cited by
- 174
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 1.84
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Current Knowledge in Synbiotic Use for Fish Aquaculture: A Review. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.4172/2155-9546.s1-008
- The paper
- Jose Meseguer, R. C. (2011). Current Knowledge in Synbiotic Use for Fish Aquaculture: A Review. Journal of Aquaculture Research & Development. https://doi.org/10.4172/2155-9546.s1-008
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.