Cited by 65Immune cells in cancerMicroRNA in disease regulationImmune Response and Inflammation

miR-24 Regulates Macrophage Polarization and Plasticity

Open access
Afsar R. Naqvi, Jezrom B. Fordham, Nares, Salvador·2015·Journal of Clinical & Cellular Immunology

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: (Pg), and revealed cigarette smoke extract as an environmental modifier of Pg LPS structure (Pg CSE) impacting macrophage miRNA responses. This study was designed to investigate the role of miR-24 on macrophage polarization and plasticity. METHODS: monocytes isolated from peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) by MACS positive selection and transfected with miR-24 miRNA mimics, inhibitors, or negative control mimic; followed by stimulation with cytokines and/or LPS under various conditions representing key stages of macrophage activation. Macrophage activation and polarization was assessed using assays for cytokine production (ELISA) and protein expression (flow cytometry, immunoblot). MiR-24 expression was assessed by RT-PCR. RESULTS: Stimulation of macrophages with LPSs of Aa, Pg, and Pg CSE origin resulted in dissimilar levels of cytokine expression and differential expression of miR-24. Overexpression of miR-24 inhibited cytokine secretion in response to LPS. Priming of macrophages with interferon gamma (IFN-γ) did not overcome this inhibitory effect, but classical activation of macrophages with IFN-γ plus TNF-α, TNF-β, or IL-17, modulated the pattern of miR-24 mediated suppression in a cytokine-specific fashion. Overexpression of miR-24 enhanced CD206 upregulation during alternative macrophage activation and inhibited its downregulation in macrophage transitioning from alternative to classical activation states. Overexpression of miR-24 resulted in reduced expression of the Class 1A PI 3-kinase subunit p110 delta (p110δ). CONCLUSION: Pathogen- and environment-specific modifications in LPS alter the expression of cytokines and miR-24 in human macrophages. MiR-24 is a negative regulator of macrophage classical activation by LPS and promotes alternative activation under conditions of polarization and plasticity. MiR-24 mediated inhibition of LPS-induced cytokine secretion is dependent upon macrophage activation state at the point of stimulation, and this may be due to the degree to which p110δ is involved in the intracellular signaling pathway/s that transduce receptor ligation into cytokine induction. While important differences were observed in the effect of miR-24 on macrophages, these data indicate that overexpression of miR-24 would be predominantly anti-inflammatory.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.4172/2155-9899.1000362

Cites

31 of 31 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • miR-24 is a negative regulator of macrophage classical activation induced by LPS; its mechanism involves modulation of phosphoinositide 3-kinase (PI3K) and further inhibition of cytokine synthesis.

    “MiR-24 is an example of a negative regulator of macrophage classical activation induced by LPS. The identified mechanism of action involves modulation of phosphoinositide 3-kinase (PI3K) and further inhibition of cytokine synthesis [124].”

    From MicroRNAs as Regulators of Phagocytosis (2022) · cites this paper as [124]

    The Introduction and Abstract Conclusion identify miR-24 as a negative regulator of LPS-induced classical macrophage activation, and the Abstract Results report inhibited cytokine secretion and reduced expression of the PI3K subunit p110δ. But the Abstract Conclusion says p110δ involvement in cytokine inhibition “may” explain the effect; the Discussion also presents it as a possibility, not an identified mechanism. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

2 of the 33 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Afsar R. Naqvi, J. B. F., & Nares, S.
Affiliations
University of Illinois Chicago (US)
Corresponding author
Nares, Salvador
Venue
Journal of Clinical & Cellular Immunology
Published
2015
Volume
06
Issue
05
ISSN
2155-9899 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2416233116
Cited by
65
References
33
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 3
FWCI
3.62
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • Journal of Clinical & Cellular Immunology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
  • University of South Carolina
  • National Institute of Dental and Craniofacial Research (R01DE021052)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Immunology › Immune cells in cancer
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cancer Research › MicroRNA in disease regulation
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Immunology › Immune Response and Inflammation
Keywords
miR-24, macrophage polarization, macrophage plasticity, cigarette smoke extract, lipopolysaccharide, macrophage activation, alternative activation, classical activation, CD206, p110δ, PI3K signaling, cytokine production, interferon-gamma, anti-inflammatory microRNA, lung inflammation, environmental modifiers

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review