A Novel ECG Ward Telemetry System with Smartphone Based Alarm Escalation
Abstract
Background: Need for a permanent control person and alarm fatigue are limitations of telemetry surveillance systems ending at the central surveillance monitor. This study evaluated an escalation system expanding the alarm sequence by smartphones. Methods: Telemetry system with 26 monitoring units and WLAN based alarm escalation system to three smartphones (Care Event, Philips) was evaluated during 128 days regarding major arrhythmia alarm (MAA) frequency, escalation of alarms within the system and response times. ECG triggering the MAA, patient name and position are shown on the smartphone display. MAA are forwarded initially to smartphone one. Forwarding of MAA to two further smartphones is actively triggered or occurs automatically after 20 sec without response by smartphone one. Results: During the analysis period 11576 MAA were forwarded, ranging from 15 to 238 alarms/day. The number of MAA was minimal at 11 pm and maximal at 8 am (ratio 1:1.8). In 69% only smartphone 1 was involved, in 31% occurred an escalation to smartphone 2 and in 13% to smartphone 3. The median MAA response time at the smartphone was 8 sec at daytime and 9 sec at nighttime. 14 min of running time could be saved on average every day by direct visit of the patient triggering an alarm and omission of the central monitoring system. Conclusions: A smartphone based alarm escalation system redundancies the permanent presence of nursing staff at the central surveillance system. The multilevel surveillance system with smartphone based escalation allows low alarm response times and warrants excellent surveillance quality
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Several strategies have been developed to reduce false alarms in the ICU, but implementation into clinical routine is still lacking.
“Although several strategies have been developed to reduce false alarms in the ICU [12,28-31], implementation into a clinical routine is still lacking.”
From Clinical requirements of future patient monitoring in the intensive care unit: qualitative study (2019) · cites this paper as [12]
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Clinical requirements of future patient monitoring in the intensive care unit: qualitative study
Poncette, A.-S., Spies, C., Mosch, L., Schieler, M., Weber-Carstens, S., Krampe, H., & Balzer, F. (2019) · JMIR Medical Informatics · doi:10.2196/13064 · Cited by 136 · see citing works
“Although several strategies have been developed to reduce false alarms in the ICU [12,28-31], implementation into a clinical routine is still lacking.”
Background
- Authors
- Hoffmann, R., Michaelsen, J., Langenbrink, L., Kastrati, M., Piatkowski, M., Hengemuhle, G., Schull, T., & Lammers, M.
- ORCID
- Hoffmann, Rainer
- Venue
- International Journal of Cardiovascular Research
- Publisher
- OMICS Publishing Group
- Published
- 2018
- Volume
- 07
- Issue
- 02
- ISSN
- 2324-8602 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2804307686
- Cited by
- 1
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2019: 1
- FWCI
- 0.26
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- International Journal of Cardiovascular Research (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Healthcare Technology and Patient Monitoring
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › ECG Monitoring and Analysis
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Cardiac pacing and defibrillation studies
- Keywords
- ECG telemetry, alarm fatigue, alarm response time, nursing workload, centralized monitoring system
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review