The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Heavy Metal Accumulation in Vegetables and Assessment of their Potential Health Risk
Abstract
Vegetables constitute essential diet components by contributing carbohydrates, proteins, vitamins, iron, calcium and other nutrients that are in short supply. The present study was conducted to evaluate vegetables such as leafy (spinach), melon (gourd, long gourd and pumpkin) and solonaceous (brinjal) for their potential to accumulate different heavy metals like Cadmium (Cd), Manganese (Mn), Chromium (Cr), Copper (Cu), Iron (Fe), Nickel (Ni), Lead (Pb) and Zinc (Zn). The content of these metals was measured by using Atomic Absorption Spectrophotometer. Mean values were recorded against each vegetable for accumulating heavy metals. It was observed that maximum concentration of Mn (137.3 mg/kg), Cr (6.62 mg/kg) and Fe (968.25 mg/kg) was found in spinach, exceeding the allowed threshold 2.2 mg/kg, 2.3 mg/kg and 425 mg/kg respectively, as set by WHO/FAO. While melon showed great potential to absorb Ni (5.05 mg/kg) which elevated safe limit 0.1 mg/kg and Cu (65 mg/kg) was within the safe range. Brinjal displayed maximum absorption of Zn (41 mg/kg), which did not cross the WHO reference limit 73 mg/kg. In case of Cd both gourd and brinjal showed equal concentration of 0.39 mg/kg but was not at the safe limit 0.241 mg/kg. However levels of Pb were below the FAO/WHO recommended limits in all the vegetables. Low concentrations of Pb indicate that these plants contribute less toxic effects of metals. Overall this order of absorption was recorded as leafyA‹ÂƒmelonA‹Âƒsolonaceous. Human…
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
RfD values for Zn, Fe, Cd/Pd, Ni, Cr, and Cu are 0.3, 0.7, 0.001, 0.02, 0.003, and 0.3 mg/kg/day respectively.
“RfD values for Zn, Fe, Cd/Pd, Ni, Cr, and Cu are respectively 0.3, 0.7, 0.001, 0.02, 0.003, and 0.3 mg/kg/day”
From Assessment of heavy metals accumulation by vegetables irrigated with different stages of textile wastewater for evaluation of food and health risk (2024) · cites this paper as Latif et al., 2018
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Hassan, J., Rajib, M. M. R., Khan, M. N.-E.-A., Khandaker, S., Zubayer, M., Ashab, K. R., Kuba, T., Marwani, H. M., Asiri, A. M., Hasan, M. M., et al. (2024) · Journal of Environmental Management · doi:10.1016/j.jenvman.2024.120206 · Cited by 88
Rai, G. K., Bhat, B. A., Mushtaq, M., Tariq, L., Rai, P. K., Basu, U., Dar, A. A., Islam, S. T., Dar, T. U. H., & Bhat, J. A. (2021) · Physiologia Plantarum · doi:10.1111/ppl.13433 · Cited by 80
Metadata
- Authors
- Latif, A., Bilal, M., Asghar, W., Azeem, M., Ahmad, M. I., Abbas, A., Zulfiqar Ahmad, M., & Shahzad, T.
- Venue
- Journal of Environmental Analytical Chemistry
- Publisher
- OMICS Publishing Group
- Published
- 2018
- Volume
- 05
- Issue
- 01
- ISSN
- 2380-2391
- Cited by
- 93
- References
- 0
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review