Cited by 438Respiratory Support and MechanismsNeonatal Respiratory Health ResearchInterstitial Lung Diseases and Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis

Hyperoxic Acute Lung Injury

Open access
Kallet, Richard H, Matthay, Michael A·2013·Respiratory Care

Abstract

Prolonged breathing of very high F(IO(2)) (F(IO(2)) ≥ 0.9) uniformly causes severe hyperoxic acute lung injury (HALI) and, without a reduction of F(IO(2)), is usually fatal. The severity of HALI is directly proportional to P(O(2)) (particularly above 450 mm Hg, or an F(IO(2)) of 0.6) and exposure duration. Hyperoxia produces extraordinary amounts of reactive O(2) species that overwhelms natural anti-oxidant defenses and destroys cellular structures through several pathways. Genetic predisposition has been shown to play an important role in HALI among animals, and some genetics-based epidemiologic research suggests that this may be true for humans as well. Clinically, the risk of HALI likely occurs when F(IO(2)) exceeds 0.7, and may become problematic when F(IO(2)) exceeds 0.8 for an extended period of time. Both high-stretch mechanical ventilation and hyperoxia potentiate lung injury and may promote pulmonary infection. During the 1960s, confusion regarding the incidence and relevance of HALI largely reflected such issues as the primitive control of F(IO(2)), the absence of PEEP, and the fact that at the time both ALI and ventilator-induced lung injury were unknown. The advent of PEEP and precise control over F(IO(2)), as well as lung-protective ventilation, and other adjunctive therapies for severe hypoxemia, has greatly reduced the risk of HALI for the vast majority of patients requiring mechanical ventilation in the 21st century. However, a subset of patients with very severe ARDS requiring hyperoxic therapy is at substantial risk for developing HALI, therefore justifying the use of such adjunctive therapies.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.4187/respcare.01963

Cites

129 of 129 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Mice treated with 60% O2 indefinitely in a standard atmosphere with oxygen content between 20% and 100% showed no signs of toxicity.

    “For normobaric hyperoxic respiration, in a standard atmosphere with an oxygen content between 20% and 100%, mice were treated with 60% O2 indefinitely without signs of toxicity.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [46]Castleman B McNeely BU Case records of the Massachusetts General Hospital. Case 7-1967 N Engl J Med 1967 276 7 401 411 6024568

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kallet, R. H., & Matthay, M. A.
Affiliations
  • San Francisco General Hospital (US)
  • University of California, San Francisco (US)
Venue
Respiratory Care
Published
2013-01-01
Volume
58
Issue
1
Pages
123-141
ISSN
0020-1324 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2146682756
Cited by
438
References
129
Citations by year
2026: 21 · 2025: 21 · 2024: 44 · 2023: 28 · 2022: 50 · 2021: 51 · 2020: 42 · 2019: 30 · 2018: 31 · 2017: 30 · 2016: 27 · 2015: 28 · 2014: 21 · 2013: 14
FWCI
4.66
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Respiratory Care (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • eScholarship (California Digital Library) (submittedVersion)
Funders
National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (R37HL051856)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Respiratory Support and Mechanisms
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Neonatal Respiratory Health Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Interstitial Lung Diseases and Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis
Keywords
hyperoxia, oxygen fraction, reactive oxygen species, oxidative stress, antioxidant defense, genetic susceptibility, mechanical ventilation, positive end-expiratory pressure, lung-protective ventilation, acute respiratory distress syndrome, pulmonary infection, hypoxemia
MeSH terms
Animals, Humans, Oxygen, Oxygen Inhalation Therapy, Partial Pressure, Superoxide Dismutase, Time Factors, Cytokines, Reactive Oxygen Species, Hyperoxia, Acute Lung Injury

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review