Cited by 4Artificial Intelligence in EducationIntelligent Tutoring Systems and Adaptive LearningEducational Technology and Pedagogy

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Artificial Intelligence in Classroom Assessment: Opportunities, Equity Challenges, and Best Practices for Formative and Summative Integration

Open access

Abstract

Artificial Intelligence (AI) is rapidly transforming classroom assessment by enabling adaptive, data-driven, and personalized approaches that extend beyond the limitations of traditional methods.This paper presents a systematic literature review of recent peer-reviewed studies focusing on AI integration in both formative and summative assessments.The review synthesizes evidence on four thematic areas: personalization, efficiency, and scalability; equity and inclusion challenges; ethical and transparency concerns; and methodological gaps in current research.Findings indicate that AI-powered tools-such as adaptive learning platforms, automated scoring systems, and natural language processing applications enhance feedback timeliness, assessment accuracy, and instructional responsiveness, particularly in high-resource settings with strong infrastructure, teacher training, and policy support.However, persistent challenges related to algorithmic bias, data privacy, transparency, and unequal access in low-resource contexts limit equitable adoption.Methodological imbalances in the literature, including overreliance on pilot studies in affluent contexts, further constrain generalizability.The paper concludes that realizing AI's transformative potential in classroom assessment requires equity-centered implementation, culturally responsive design, robust governance, and sustained professional development to ensure AI serves as a tool for inclusion rather than a mechanism for reinforcing educational disparities.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.4236/oalib.1114121

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 30

  1. Chaudhry, M.A. and Kazim, S. (2022) Artificial Intelligence in Computer Science: Bridging Human and Machine Cognition. International Journal of Computer Science and AI, 10, 23-31.
  2. Akgun, B. and Greenhow, C. (2022) The Integration of AI in Education: Classroom Assessment and Student Engagement. Journal of Educational Technology, 33, 245- 258.
  3. Delgado, A., Wardlow, L., Olin, S. and McKnight, K. (2020) The Effects of Using Adaptive Learning Technology on Student Learning Outcomes: A Meta-Analysis. Educational Technology Research and Development, 68, 2161-2182. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-020-09807-4 · DOI
  4. Popenici, S.A.D. and Kerr, S. (2017) Exploring the Impact of Artificial Intelligence on Teaching and Learning in Higher Education. Research and Practice in Technology Enhanced Learning, 12, 22-37. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41039-017-0062-8 · DOI · Paper page
  5. Chen, S., Fan, W. and He, L. (2020) Adaptive Learning Systems for Personalized Ed- ucation: Insights from the Case of ALEKS. Educational Technology Research and De- velopment, 68, 1-18. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-019-09713-7 · DOI
  6. Zawacki-Richter, O., Marín, V.I., Bond, M. and Gouverneur, F. (2019) Systematic Review of Research on Artificial Intelligence Applications in Higher Education-Where Are the Educators? International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Educa- tion, 16, 1-27. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-019-0171-0 · DOI · Paper page
  7. Holstein, K., McLaren, B.M. and Aleven, V. (2018) Student Learning Benefits of a Real-Time Classroom Orchestration Tool Supported by Teacher AI. Proceedings of the International Conference on Learning Analytics & Knowledge (LAK), Vol. 10, 11-15. https://doi.org/10.1145/3170358.3170361 · DOI
  8. Balfour, S.P. (2013) Assessing Writing in MOOCs: Automated Essay Scoring and Calibrated Peer Review. Research & Practice in Assessment, 8, 40-48.
  9. Strobl, C., et al. (2019) Machine Learning for Automated Essay Scoring: A Review. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 57, 331-353. https://doi.org/10.1177/0735633117741520 · DOI
  10. Johnson, W.L. and Lester, J.C. (2015) Face-to-Face Interaction with Pedagogical Agents, Twenty Years Later. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Educa- tion, 26, 25-36. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40593-015-0065-9 · DOI · Paper page
  11. Shute, V.J. and Rahimi, S. (2017) Review of Computer-Based Assessment for Learn- ing in Elementary and Secondary Education. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 33, 1-19. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcal.12172 · DOI
  12. Stone, D., et al. (2020) The Role of AI in Remote Proctoring and Exam Security. Ed- ucational Research Review, 31, Article ID: 100334.
  13. Dawson, P. (2015) Five Ways to Hack and Cheat with Bring-Your-Own-Device Elec- tronic Examinations. British Journal of Educational Technology, 47, 592-600. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12246 · DOI
  14. Li, H., Yang, S. and Sun, Y. (2021) Evaluating Automated Feedback Mechanisms in Writing Assessments. Journal of Educational Measurement, 58, 222-240.
  15. Dikli, S. (2019) Automated Essay Scoring: Applications to Educational Technology. The Journal of Technology, Learning, and Assessment, 3, 1-20.
  16. Ifenthaler, D. and Schumacher, C. (2016) Learning Analytics in Higher Education: A Literature Review. British Journal of Educational Technology, 47, 924-937.
  17. Koedinger, K.R., et al. (2013) Predictive Analytics in Education: Methods and Appli- cations. International Journal of Learning Analytics and Artificial Intelligence in Ed- ucation, 7, 3-19.
  18. Dawson, S. (2016) Five Ways to Hack and Cheat with Electronic Examinations. Brit- ish Journal of Educational Technology, 47, 592-600.
  19. Walker, J. (2010) Student Plagiarism in Universities: Learning for Better Assessment in Higher Education. Studies in Higher Education, 35, 387-406. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075070903062892 · DOI
  20. Sharma, D., Jones, R. and Smith, K. (2020) The Ethics of AI in Education: Privacy and Security Concerns. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 23, 75-85.
  21. Benitez, K., Gordon, A. and Olson, J. (2017) AI in Education: The Importance of Ethics and Bias Management. AIED Journal, 25, 112-128.
  22. Selwyn, N. (2019) Should Robots Replace Teachers? AI and the Future of Education. John Wiley & Sons.
  23. Jomaa, N.J. (2025) Corrective Feedback of AI Tools in Writing and Translation. In: Using AI Tools in Text Analysis, Simplification, Classification, and Synthesis, IGI Global, 293-318. https://doi.org/10.4018/979-8-3693-9511-0.ch010 · DOI
  24. Hooda, M., Rana, C., Dahiya, O., Rizwan, A. and Hossain, M.S. (2022) Artificial In- telligence for Assessment and Feedback to Enhance Student Success in Higher Edu- cation. Mathematical Problems in Engineering, 2022, Article ID: 5215722. https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/5215722 · DOI · Paper page
  25. West, R., Hoopes, R. and Berrett, D. (2020) The Future of AI in Summative Assess- ments: Implications and Innovations. Educational Assessment, 25, 253-272. https://doi.org/10.1080/10627197.2020.1832680 · DOI
  26. Holmes, W. and Tuomi, I. (2022) State of the Art and Practice in AI in Education. European Journal of Education, 57, 542-570. https://doi.org/10.1111/ejed.12533 · DOI · Paper page
  27. Olanrewaju, A.S. (2024) The Nexus of Human Communication and AI in the Work- place. Journal of Communication and Management, 3, 260-264. https://doi.org/10.58966/jcm20243311 · DOI
  28. Heffernan, N.T. and Heffernan, C.L. (2014) The Assessments Ecosystem: Building a Platform That Brings Scientists and Teachers Together for Minimally Invasive Research on Human Learning and Teaching. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 24, 470-497. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40593-014-0024-x · DOI · Paper page
  29. Luckin, R., Holmes, W., Griffiths, M. and Forcier, L.B. (2016) Intelligence Unleashed: An Argument for AI in Education. Pearson.
  30. Ifenthaler, D. and Yau, J.Y. (2020) Reflections on Different Learning Analytics Indi- cators for Supporting Study Success. International Journal of Learning Analytics and Artificial Intelligence for Education, 2, 4-23. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijai.v2i2.15639 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 4

Metadata

Authors
Kalonde, G., Boateng, S., & Duedu, C.
Affiliations
Montana State University (US)
Venue
OALib
Published
2025
Volume
12
Issue
09
Pages
1-16
ISSN
  • 2333-9705 (ISSN-L)
  • 2333-9721
OpenAlex
W4414673253
Cited by
2
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 2
FWCI
2.09
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
other-oa
Locations
OALib (publishedVersion, other-oa)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Education › Artificial Intelligence in Education
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Intelligent Tutoring Systems and Adaptive Learning
  • Social Sciences › Education › Educational Technology and Pedagogy
Keywords
artificial intelligence in education, classroom assessment, formative assessment, summative assessment, adaptive learning systems, automated grading, algorithmic bias, educational equity, data privacy, transparency, personalized learning, teacher professional development, resource-limited settings, culturally responsive design

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Artificial Intelligence in Classroom Assessment: Opportunities, Equity Challenges, and Best Practices for Formative and Summative Integration. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.4236/oalib.1114121
The paper
Kalonde, G., Boateng, S., & Duedu, C. (2025). Artificial Intelligence in Classroom Assessment: Opportunities, Equity Challenges, and Best Practices for Formative and Summative Integration. OALib. https://doi.org/10.4236/oalib.1114121