Cited by 3Obstructive Sleep Apnea ResearchAirway Management and Intubation TechniquesBariatric Surgery and Outcomes

Does Obstructive Sleep Apnea (OSA) Increase the Risk of Post-Operative Respiratory Complications after Bariatric Surgery?

Open access
Elrashidy, Ayman A., Elsherif, Mohamed, Elhag, Wahiba, Abdel-Rahman, Reda Sobhi, Abdelaziem, S.·2018·Open Journal of Anesthesiology

Abstract

Background: OSA affects up to quarter of general population. It is associated with morbid obesity with a higher morbidity and mortality rates. STOP Bang questionnaire is a validated method for OSA screening. OSA patients are at high risk of developing airway obstruction, cardiac events, congestive heart failure, stroke and desaturation post operatively. The aim of this study is to evaluate adverse respiratory events in patients undergoing bariatric surgery in relation to risk of OSA using Stop Bang questionnaire. Methods: This prospective double cohort study was conducted in Tanta University Hospital from Marchto August 2017. During the preoperative assessment, STOP-BANG questionnaire was performed. After extubation, patients were transferred to PACU unit. Respiratory complications were assessed thereafter. Based on STOP-BANG score, patients were divided into two groups, high risk of OSA with STOP-BANG > 3 (Group I) and low risk of OSA with STOP-BANG Results: 104 patients were included in this study. Group I had more comorbidities in the form of CAD (15% versus 2%, P 0.001). Higher number of respiratory complications was noted in high-risk group (31 patients, 59%) compared to (24 patients, 46%) in group II yet, it was not significant. Conclusion: Obese patients with STOP-BANG score > 3 undergoing bariatric surgery are associated with hypertension, dyslipidemia, CAD, and renal insufficiency. High-risk OSA obese patients are at higher risk of developing respiratory compilations like inability to breathe deeply and hypoxia in postoperatively.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.4236/ojanes.2018.810026

Cites

29 of 29 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Elrashidy, A. A., Elsherif, M., Elhag, W., Abdel-Rahman, R. S., & Abdelaziem, S.
Affiliations
  • Tanta University (EG)
  • Hamad Medical Corporation (QA)
Venue
Open Journal of Anesthesiology
Published
2018
Volume
08
Issue
10
Pages
255-266
ISSN
  • 2164-5531 (ISSN-L)
  • 2164-5558
OpenAlex
W2898251751
Cited by
3
References
29
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2020: 1
FWCI
0.17
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
Open Journal of Anesthesiology (publishedVersion, cc-by)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Obstructive Sleep Apnea Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine › Airway Management and Intubation Techniques
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Bariatric Surgery and Outcomes
Keywords
obstructive sleep apnea, bariatric surgery, postoperative pulmonary complications, STOP-BANG questionnaire, OSA screening, morbid obesity, postoperative hypoxia, postoperative dyspnea, coronary artery disease, comorbidities

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review