Cited by 3Stress Responses and CortisolTreatment of Major DepressionAdrenal Hormones and Disorders

Etiology and Diagnosis of Major Depression—A Novel Quantitative Approach

Open access
Ottesen, Johnny T.·2013·Open Journal of Endocrine and Metabolic Diseases

Abstract

Background: Classical psychiatric opinions are relative uncertain and treatment results are not impressive when dealing with major depression. Depression is related to the endocrine system, but despite much effort a good quantitative measure for characterizing depression has not yet emerged. Methods: Based on ACTH and cortisol levels and using clustering analysis and mixture effect modeling we propose a novel and scientifically based quantitative index, denoted the O-index. The O-index combines a weighted and scaled deviation from normal values in both ACTH and cortisol. Results: Using ANOVA we compare the O-index with opinions reach by classical psychiatric diagnostic procedure (sensitivity 83%, specificity 59%, likelihood ratio positive 2.0, and likelihood ratio negative 0.29). The O-index nicely refines the etiology of depression: Combined with clinical data for 29 subjects earlier reported three categories emerge (p = 4.4 × 10-13): hypocortisolemic depressed, non-depressed, and hypercotisolemic depressed. The O-index also reveals why it has been difficult to obtain good markers earlier. It explains that healthy subjects may have an elevated (suppressed) level of cortisol or ACTH, however, the healthy system is able to deal with such elevated (suppressed) levels by compensating through suppressing (stimulating) the other component. In contrast the O-index shows that depressed subjects are incapable of making such compensation to a satisfactory degree. We illustrate how the O-index may be used for diagnostic procedure. Discussion: The methods are discussed and based on the available data material we propose that the O-index may be used to improve the diagnostic procedure and consequently the follow-up treatment.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.4236/ojemd.2013.32018

Cites

21 of 21 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The model differentiates between the hypercortisolemic depressed and control groups in agreement with the findings in [39].

    “We notice that the model differentiates between the groups in agreement with the findings in [39] where mixture modeling and cluster analysis has been used.”
  • In [39], a mixture density function and cluster analysis showed three clusters statistically related to non-depressed, hypercortisolemic depressed, and hypocortisolemic depressed subjects.

    “In [39] a mixture density function and cluster analysis approach are showing that the outcome of three clusters turn out to be statistically related to non-depressed subjects, hypercortisolemic depressed subjects and hypocortisolemic depressed subjects.”
  • Healthy subjects may have elevated or suppressed cortisol or ACTH but compensate by suppressing or stimulating the other component; depressed subjects are incapable of such compensation.

    “It is shown that healthy subjects may have an elevated (suppressed) level of cortisol or ACTH, however, the healthy system is able to deal with such elevated (suppressed) levels by compensating through suppressing (stimulating) the other component. Depressed subjects, however, are incapable of making such compensation.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ottesen, J. T.
Affiliations
Roskilde University (DK)
Corresponding author
Ottesen, Johnny T.
Venue
Open Journal of Endocrine and Metabolic Diseases
Published
2013
Volume
03
Issue
02
Pages
120-127
ISSN
  • 2165-7424 (ISSN-L)
  • 2165-7432
OpenAlex
W1987557049
Cited by
3
References
21
Citations by year
2022: 1 · 2016: 1 · 2014: 1
FWCI
0.30
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
Open Journal of Endocrine and Metabolic Diseases (publishedVersion, cc-by)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Behavioral Neuroscience › Stress Responses and Cortisol
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Treatment of Major Depression
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Adrenal Hormones and Disorders
Keywords
major depressive disorder, ACTH, cortisol, depression diagnosis, biomarkers, clustering, hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review