Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 406

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 60 of the 60 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Risk of stroke after transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI): a meta-analysis of 10,037 published patients

Eggebrecht, Holger, Schmermund, Axel, Voigtländer, Thomas, Kahlert, Philipp, Erbel, Raimund, Mehta, Rajendra H.·2012·EuroIntervention

Abstract

AIMS: Transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) represents a novel treatment option for inoperable or high surgical risk patients with severe symptomatic aortic valve disease. Recent randomised studies have raised major safety concerns because of increased stroke/transient ischemic attack (TIA) rates with TAVI compared to medical treatment and conventional aortic valve replacement. We aimed to review all currently published literature and estimate the incidence of periprocedural stroke and outcomes in patients undergoing TAVI. METHODS AND RESULTS: Fifty-three studies including a total of 10,037 patients undergoing transfemoral, transapical or trans-subclavian TAVI for native aortic valve stenosis published between 01/2004 and 11/2011 were identified and included in a meta-analysis. Patients were 81.5 ± 1.8-years-old and had a mean logistic EuroSCORE of 24.77 ± 5.60%. Procedural stroke (<24 h) occurred in 1.5 ± 1.4%. The overall 30-day stroke/TIA was 3.3 ± 1.8%, with the majority being major strokes (2.9 ± 1.8%). During the first year after TAVI, stroke/TIA increased up to 5.2 ± 3.4%. Differences in stroke rates were associated with different approaches and valve prostheses used with lowest stroke rates after transapical TAVI (2.7 ± 1.4%). Average 30-day mortality was more than 3.5-fold higher in patients with compared to those without stroke (25.5 ± 21.9% vs. 6.9 ± 4.2%). CONCLUSIONS: TAVI was associated with average 30-day stroke/TIA rate of 3.3 ± 1.8% (range 0-6%). Most of these strokes were major strokes and were associated with increased mortality within in the first 30 days.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.4244/eijv8i1a20

Cites

60 of 60 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 60 references

Cited by

See all 406

Metadata

Authors
Eggebrecht, H., Schmermund, A., Voigtländer, T., Kahlert, P., Erbel, R., & Mehta, R. H.
Venue
EuroIntervention
Published
2012-05
Volume
8
Issue
1
Pages
129-138
ISSN
1774-024X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2086960806
Cited by
406
References
60
FWCI
8.89
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Risk of stroke after transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI): a meta-analysis of 10,037 published patients. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.4244/eijv8i1a20
The paper
Eggebrecht, H., Schmermund, A., Voigtländer, T., Kahlert, P., Erbel, R., & Mehta, R. H. (2012). Risk of stroke after transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI): a meta-analysis of 10,037 published patients. EuroIntervention. https://doi.org/10.4244/eijv8i1a20

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.