Cited by 459Neural Networks and Reservoir ComputingNeural Networks and ApplicationsNeural dynamics and brain function

Echo state network

Open access
Jaeger, Herbert·2007·Scholarpedia

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.4249/scholarpedia.2330

Cites

34 of 34 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Even randomly initialized RNNs can be paired with a learned readout to match any target signal, provided the RNN has enough units.

    “it is known that even randomly initialized RNNs can be paired with a learned readout to match any target signal, provided the RNN has enough units.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 6

  1. Atiya A.F. and Parlos A.G. (2000) New results on recurrent network training: Unifying the algorithms and accelerating convergence. IEEE Trans. Neural Networks, 11(3):697-709
  2. Jaeger H. (2003): Adaptive nonlinear system identification with echo state networks. In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 15, S. Becker, S. Thrun, K. Obermayer (Eds), (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, 2003) pp. 593-600
  3. Kirby, K. (1991) Context dynamics in neural sequential learning. Proc. Florida AI Research Symposium (FLAIRS) 1991, 66-70
  4. Polydoros, A., Nalpantidis, L., and Krüger, V. (2015) Advantages and limitations of reservoir computing on model learning for robot control. IROS Workshop on Machine Learning in Planning and Control of Robot Motion, Hamburg, Germany
  5. Schomaker, L. (1990) Neural Network Models of Temporal Pattern Generation (Abstract). Conference on Sequencing and Timing of Human Movement. Wassenaar (The Netherlands): NIAS, p. 27.
  6. Schomaker, L. (1991) Simulation and Recognition of Handwriting Movements: A vertical approach to modeling human motor behavior. PhD thesis, Nijmeegs Instituut voor Cognitie-onderzoek en Informatietechnologie, Nijmegen

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Jaeger, H.
Corresponding author
Jaeger, Herbert
Venue
Scholarpedia
Publisher
Scholarpedia
Published
2007
Volume
2
Issue
9
Pages
2330
ISSN
1941-6016 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2054217036
Cited by
459
References
34
Citations by year
2026: 26 · 2025: 44 · 2024: 48 · 2023: 42 · 2022: 35 · 2021: 30 · 2020: 24 · 2019: 18 · 2018: 28 · 2017: 16 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 14 · 2014: 22 · 2013: 24 · 2012: 22
FWCI
15.78
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by-nc-sa
Locations
Scholarpedia (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Neural Networks and Reservoir Computing
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Neural Networks and Applications
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural dynamics and brain function
Keywords
echo state networks, reservoir computing, recurrent neural networks, time series forecasting

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review