Cited by 109Malaria Research and ControlBird parasitology and diseasesBacterial Identification and Susceptibility Testing

One year's experience with the polymerase chain reaction as a routine method for the diagnosis of imported malaria.

Morassin, B, Fabre, R, Berry, A, Magnaval, J F·2002·The American journal of tropical medicine and hygiene

Abstract

Given the problems encountered in westernized countries with the laboratory diagnosis of malaria, namely sensitivity of the conventional methods and detection of mixed infections, a polymerase chain reaction (PCR)-based diagnosis has been developed and routinely used. The PCR used two sets of primers to simultaneously detect any infection due to the genus Plasmodium, or to the species P. falciparum. The PCR results were available within six hours. Five hundred twenty-nine patients were tested, of whom 136 were found positive by the PCR, and only 104 by the quantitative buffy coat (QBC) method. The 32 discrepancies were analyzed on the basis of the clinical data, and technical, molecular, and sequencing findings to ascertain the presence of Plasmodium DNA. The PCR-based diagnosis of malaria appeared to be a useful tool that was suitable as a second-line method when the results of conventional techniques were negative in patients presenting a syndromeconsistent with malaria, as well as yielding an accurate species identification.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.4269/ajtmh.2002.66.503

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Most published PCR assays are gel based with or without subsequent probe hybridizations.

    “However, most published PCR assays are gel based with (4, 5, 15) or without (2, 3, 9, 23, 25-27, 29, 31, 35, 36) subsequent probe hybridizations”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Morassin, B., Fabre, R., Berry, A., & Magnaval, J. F.
Affiliations
Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Toulouse (FR)
Venue
The American journal of tropical medicine and hygiene
Published
2002-05
Volume
66
Issue
5
Pages
503-508
ISSN
0002-9637 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2160342429
Cited by
109
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 5
FWCI
5.64
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Malaria Research and Control
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Parasitology › Bird parasitology and diseases
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Clinical Biochemistry › Bacterial Identification and Susceptibility Testing
Keywords
imported malaria, malaria diagnosis, PCR, Plasmodium species identification, Plasmodium falciparum, mixed malaria infection, diagnostic sensitivity
MeSH terms
Adult, Animals, Base Sequence, Female, France, Humans, Malaria, Male, Plasmodium, Travel, Polymerase Chain Reaction, DNA Primers

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review