Cited by 26Multiple Sclerosis Research StudiesCancer survivorship and careResilience and Mental Health

Quality of Life, Coping, and Social Support in Patients with Multiple Sclerosis: A Pilot Study

Open access
Zengin, Oğuzhan, Erbay, Ercüment, Yıldırım, Buğra, Altındağ, Özgür·2017·Turkish Journal Of Neurology

Abstract

Objective: The aim of this study was to obtain information concerning the relationship between the sociodemographic attributes, social support systems, coping strategies, and quality of life of patients with multiple sclerosis (MS). Materials and Methods:This study was designed as a cross-sectional study.The research was conducted with 214 patients from the MS Society of Turkey.Results: Sociodemographic variables have an impact on the coping styles of patients with MS.When the relationship between coping and quality of life is examined, there is a positive correlation between the use of problem-focused coping strategies and quality of life, whereas there is a negative correlation between the use of emotion-focused coping strategies and quality of life.The scores of active coping, planning, use of emotional support, and use of instrumental support of patients who received social support were higher, whereas their denial scores were lower. Conclusions:According to the findings of our study, the sociodemographic attributes and social support mechanisms of patients have an impact on their quality of life, as well as the way they cope with MS.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.4274/tnd.37074

Cites

14 of 14 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Active coping, problem resolution, planning problem solving, cognitive positive restructuring, emotional and instrumental social support, emotional expression, acceptance and growth are related to higher quality of life in multiple sclerosis.

    “Active coping, problem resolution, planning problem solving, cognitive positive restructuring, emotional and instrumental social support, emotional expression, acceptance and growth were related to a higher QoL in MS.51 71 79–82”
  • Denial and avoidance of the challenges of the disease were associated with a lower quality of life in multiple sclerosis.

    “However, in general, strategies associated with denial51 79 and avoidance of the challenges of the disease, such as problem avoidance,71 81 behavioural disengagement,51 80 distancing,81 self-distraction,79 social withdrawal71 and wishful thinking,71 were associated with a lower QoL.”
  • Strategies based on acceptance and active commitment led to higher quality of life in multiple sclerosis.

    “On the contrary, strategies based on acceptance and active commitment, such as active coping, humour, problem resolution, cognitive positive restructuring and emotional expression, led to higher QoL in MS.51 71 79–82”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 6

  1. O'Brien MT. Multiple sclerosis: The role of social support and disability. Clin Nurs Res 1993;2:67-85.
  2. Rommer PS, Sühnel A, König N, Zettl UK. Coping with multiple sclerosis- the role of social support. Acta Neurol Scand 2016;135:11-16.
  3. McCabe MP, McKern S. Quality of life and multiple sclerosis: Comparison between people with multiple sclerosis and people from the general population. J Clin Psychol Med Settings 2002;9:287-295.
  4. Lazarus RS. Stress and adjustment: Patterns of adjustment. New York: McGraw-Hill Book Company, 1976.
  5. Lazarus RS. Emotions and interpersonal relationship: Toward a person- centered conceptualization of emotions and coping. J Pers 2006;74:9- 46.
  6. Tuna ME. Cross-cultural differences in coping strategies as predictors of university adjustment of Turkish and US Students. Ankara: Middle East Technical University Unpublished doctoral thesis, 2003.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Zengin, O., Erbay, E., Yıldırım, B., & Altındağ, Ö.
Affiliations
  • Çankırı Karatekin University (TR)
  • Hacettepe University (TR)
  • Manisa Celal Bayar University (TR)
  • Dicle University (TR)
Venue
Turkish Journal Of Neurology
Published
2017-12-22
Volume
23
Issue
4
Pages
211-218
ISSN
1301-062X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2776162415
Cited by
26
References
14
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 1
FWCI
0.64
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Turkish Journal Of Neurology (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • Hacettepe University Institutional Repository (hacettepe.edu.tr) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pathology and Forensic Medicine › Multiple Sclerosis Research Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer survivorship and care
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Resilience and Mental Health
Keywords
multiple sclerosis, quality of life, coping strategies, social support, problem-focused coping, emotion-focused coping, sociodemographic factors, denial, instrumental support, emotional support

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review