Cited by 151Multiple Sclerosis Research StudiesCancer survivorship and careResilience and Mental Health

Coping strategies, psychological variables and their relationship with quality of life in multiple sclerosis

Goretti, Benedetta, Portaccio, Emilio, Zipoli, Valentina, Hakiki, Bahia, Siracusa, Gianfranco, Sorbi, Sandro, Amato, Maria Pia·2009·Neurological Sciences

Abstract

The aim of this study was to assess the impact of psychological features in the choice of coping strategies in multiple sclerosis (MS) patients, and their influence on quality of life (QoL). One hundred four patients (72 women, age 45.3 +/- 10.9 years, disease duration 17.9 +/- 13.2 years, Expanded Disability Status Scale 2.8 +/- 2.0) were assessed through the Beck Depression Inventory, the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory, the Eysenck Personality Questionnaire, the Coping Orientation for Problem Experiences-New Italian version and the MSQoL-54. MS patients were less likely to use problem-focused strategies, whereas avoiding strategies were adopted more frequently. The use of positive strategies positively influenced both mental and overall QoL. Depression had a negative impact on all QoL domains and anxiety on mental domains. These data point out the importance of a comprehensive assessment of MS patients. Orienting therapeutic interventions, to oppose depression and anxiety and to favour more appropriate coping strategies can improve the patients' QoL.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s10072-008-0009-3

Cites

26 of 26 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Goretti, B., Portaccio, E., Zipoli, V., Hakiki, B., Siracusa, G., Sorbi, S., & Amato, M. P.
Affiliations
University of Florence (IT)
Corresponding author
Amato, Maria Pia
Venue
Neurological Sciences
Published
2009-01-20
Volume
30
Issue
1
Pages
15-20
ISSN
  • 1590-1874 (ISSN-L)
  • 1590-3478
OpenAlex
W2136176715
Cited by
151
References
26
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 15 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 12 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 14 · 2014: 14 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 10
FWCI
5.64
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Neurological Sciences (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Florence Research (University of Florence) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pathology and Forensic Medicine › Multiple Sclerosis Research Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer survivorship and care
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Resilience and Mental Health
Keywords
multiple sclerosis, coping strategies, quality of life, depression, anxiety, problem-focused coping, avoidance coping, positive coping, personality traits, psychological assessment
MeSH terms
Adaptation, Psychological, Adult, Age Factors, Anxiety Disorders, Depressive Disorder, Fatigue, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Multiple Sclerosis, Neuropsychological Tests, Problem Solving, Quality of Life, Surveys and Questionnaires, Sex Factors, Social Support, Comorbidity, Early Diagnosis

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review