Cited by 40

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Impact Evaluation of a Pilot Web-Based Intervention to Increase Physical Activity

Grim, Melissa, Hortz, Brian, Petosa, Rick·2011·American Journal of Health Promotion

Abstract

Purpose.: The purpose of this pilot study was to conduct an impact evaluation of a 10-week Web-based physical activity intervention. Design.: Quasi-experimental, three-group pretest, posttest design. Setting.: Large Midwestern university. Subjects.: Participants (N = 233) included college students registered for three courses. The study employed a convenience sample consisting of a Web-based group (n = 108), a physical activity group (n = 64), and a general health group (n = 61). Intervention.: The Web-based group received a Social Cognitive Theory behavioral skill-building intervention and exercised 3 days per week in their leisure time. The physical activity group received exercise instruction and was required to attend three physical activity labs per week. The comparison group received health instruction. Measures.: Outcome variables included moderate and vigorous physical activity, self-regulation, social support, self-efficacy, and outcome expectations and expectancies. Analysis.: Differences between groups were assessed at pretest and posttest using multiple analyses of variance. Results.: Vigorous physical activity, self-regulation, and outcome expectancy value changed significantly in the Web-based and physical activity course groups (p < .01). Conclusions.: Even with consideration of limitations such as small sample size and lack of randomization, the Web-based and traditional physical activity lecture and activity lab interventions were superior in eliciting changes in vigorous physical activity, self-regulation, and outcome expectancy value than a traditional health course. (Am J Health Promot 2011;25[4]:227–230.)

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.4278/ajhp.081216-arb-307

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 7

  1. 10.1016/j.pec.2007.02.013 · DOI
  2. Ferney SL, Health Educ, 21, 560
  3. Bandura A. Social Foundations of Thought and Action: A Social Cognitive Theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall;1986.
  4. 10.5993/AJHB.27.4.2 · DOI
  5. 10.1123/jsep.13.4.394 · DOI
  6. 10.1016/S1054-139X(03)00046-6 · DOI
  7. 10.1007/BF02879907 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 40

Metadata

Authors
Grim, M., Hortz, B., & Petosa, R.
Venue
American Journal of Health Promotion
Published
2011-03
Volume
25
Issue
4
Pages
227-230
ISSN
  • 0890-1171
  • 2168-6602
Cited by
40
References
3
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review