Cited by 66Physical Activity and HealthObesity, Physical Activity, DietSchool Health and Nursing Education

Impact of recess interventions on children's physical activity-a meta-analysis

Erwin, Heather E., Ickes, Melinda, Ahn, Soyeon, Fedewa, Alicia·2014·American Journal of Health Promotion

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this paper was to explore the effect of recess interventions on children's physical activity (PA) levels and to examine which specific interventions/characteristics have more influence on children's PA. DATA SOURCE: Academic Search Premier, CINAHL, ERIC, MEDLINE, ProQuest, SPORT Discus. STUDY INCLUSION AND EXCLUSION CRITERIA: Papers published between 1986 and 2012, published in the English language, and evaluating any recess intervention with PA as an outcome. DATA EXTRACTION: Study outcomes were distilled into seven domains related to PA: age, gender, intervention type, intervention duration, duration of PA per intervention session, outcome measures, and study region. DATA SYNTHESIS: Effect sizes were pooled within and across studies for each domain separately. Moderator analyses were performed using gender, age, and total length of intervention. Twenty-three independent samples were provided from 13 studies. RESULTS: The estimated overall effect size for time in PA was .56 (SE .07), suggesting a positive and significant mean difference between pretest and posttest PA time after implementing a recess intervention. Differences in PA levels were moderated by age, duration and type of intervention, and type of outcome measures. CONCLUSION. The limited evidence suggests recess interventions can improve youth PA levels. Implications reinforce the importance of schools in advocating for recess during the school day. Strategies shown to increase student PA during recess should be implemented.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.4278/ajhp.120926-lit-470

Cites

47 of 47 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Erwin, H. E., Ickes, M., Ahn, S., & Fedewa, A.
Affiliations
University of Kentucky (US)
Corresponding author
Erwin, Heather E.
Venue
American Journal of Health Promotion
Published
2014-01
Volume
28
Issue
3
Pages
159-167
ISSN
  • 0890-1171 (ISSN-L)
  • 2168-6602
OpenAlex
W2093842999
Cited by
66
References
47
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 4
FWCI
0.37
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • American Journal of Health Promotion (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Physical Activity and Health
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Obesity, Physical Activity, Diet
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Speech and Hearing › School Health and Nursing Education
Keywords
children's physical activity, recess, intervention duration, age differences, gender differences, school health promotion
MeSH terms
Child, Child, Preschool, Humans, Motor Activity, Play and Playthings, School Health Services

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review