Cited by 45Food Safety and HygieneFood Supply Chain TraceabilityConsumer Attitudes and Food Labeling

Consumer knowledge and use of open dates: results of a web-based survey

Open access
Kosa, Katherine M., Cates, Sheryl C., Karns, Shawn, Godwin, Sandria L., Chambers, Delores·2007·Journal of Food Protection

Abstract

Consumers are relying increasingly on ready-to-eat (RTE) foods because they are convenient, quick, and easy. Open dates let consumers know by which date to purchase or use RTE foods for best quality. To further characterize consumer knowledge and use of open dates for specific refrigerated RTE foods (smoked seafood, cooked crustaceans, bagged salads, prewashed cut produce, soft cheeses, frankfurters, deli meats, fermented sausages, and deli salads), we conducted a nationally representative web-enabled survey (n=2060). Before purchasing RTE foods, 48 to 68% of respondents check open dates all or most of the time. Before preparing RTE foods, 43 to 64% of respondents check open dates all or most of the time. Nearly two-thirds of respondents reported that their senses were the most important factors in deciding whether to eat a refrigerated food, which is an unsafe practice. About one-third of respondents reported that an open date is the most important factor in deciding whether to eat a refrigerated food. Many respondents, however, do not understand the meanings of the different types of dates. Only 18% correctly defined the use-by date. The findings suggest consumers could benefit from education regarding open dates and recommended storage times for RTE foods.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.4315/0362-028x-70.5.1213

Cites

12 of 12 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • State rules vary in coverage and what the dates mean, which leads to consumer confusion, and often results in safe, edible food being thrown away.

    “State rules vary in coverage and what the dates mean which leads to consumer confusion (Kosa et al. 2007), and often results in safe, edible food being thrown away.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

2 of the 14 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 4

  1. Couper, M. P. 2000. Web surveys: a review of issues and approaches. Public Opin. Q. 64:464-494.
  2. EPM Communications, Inc. 2004. Consumers increasingly seek out convenience in all aspects of their lives. Res. ALERT 22(9):1, 6-7.
  3. Labuza, T. P., and L. M. Szybist. 1999. Playing the open dating game. Food Technol. 53(7):70-85.
  4. In M. P. Doyle, L. R. Beuchat, and T. J. Montville (ed.), Food microbiology: fundamentals and frontiers. ASM Press, Washington, D.C.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kosa, K. M., Cates, S. C., Karns, S., Godwin, S. L., & Chambers, D.
Affiliations
  • RTI International (US)
  • Tennessee State University (US)
  • Kansas State University (US)
Corresponding author
Kosa, Katherine M.
Venue
Journal of Food Protection
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2007-05
Volume
70
Issue
5
Pages
1213-1219
ISSN
0362-028X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2403317330
Cited by
45
References
14
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 4 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 5
FWCI
2.70
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Food Protection (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • U.S. Department of Agriculture (2004-51110-02177)
  • Cooperative State Research, Education, and Extension Service
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Food Safety and Hygiene
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Food Supply Chain Traceability
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Consumer Attitudes and Food Labeling
Keywords
use-by date, ready-to-eat foods, consumer knowledge, food safety, refrigerated foods, purchase decision, food storage, deli meat, soft cheese, consumer education
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Consumer Product Safety, Data Collection, Female, Food Handling, Food Labeling, Food Microbiology, Food Preservation, Health Education, Humans, Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice, Male, Meat Products, Middle Aged, Time Factors, Internet

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review