Cited by 61Postharvest Quality and Shelf Life ManagementFungal Plant Pathogen ControlPlant Disease Management Techniques

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Evaluation of Food Additives as Alternative or Complementary Chemicals to Conventional Fungicides for the Control of Major Postharvest Diseases of Stone Fruit

Open access
Palou, Lluís, Smilanick, Joseph L., Crisosto, Carlos H.·2009·Journal of Food Protection

Abstract

To evaluate potential alternatives to conventional fungicides to control decay, more than 20 food additives and generally regarded as safe compounds were tested at three concentrations in in vivo primary screenings with several cultivars of California peaches, nectarines, and plums that had been artificially inoculated with seven major postharvest pathogens: Monilinia fructicola, Botrytis cinerea, Geotrichum candidum, Alternaria alternata, Penicillium expansum, Mucor piriformis, and Rhizopus stolonifer. Overall, the best compounds were 200 mM potassium sorbate (PS), 200 mM sodium benzoate (SB), 200 mM sodium sorbate, 100 mM 2-deoxy-D-glucose, 400 mM sodium carbonate, and 250 mM potassium carbonate. Sodium and ammonium molybdates, acid lactic, and hydrogen peroxide were somewhat effective but were phytotoxic to fruit skin tissues. However, the best compounds lacked effectiveness and persistence when tested against brown rot in small-scale trials of 60-s dips in aqueous solutions at ambient temperatures; PS and SB reduced brown rot incidence by less than 40%. Rinsing treated fruit with tap water reduced the efficacy of the compounds by up to 30%. In contrast, heating the solutions to 55 or 60 degrees C significantly increased treatment efficacy. Brown rot incidence and severity were reduced by 35 and 25%, respectively, on PS-treated peaches after 7 days of incubation at 20 degrees C. However, treatment efficacy was not superior to that with water alone at these temperatures. In semicommercial trials, mixtures of fludioxonil with PS, SB, or 2-deoxy-D-glucose applied as fruit coatings on a packing line were not synergistic in their effect on brown rot, gray mold, and sour rot.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.4315/0362-028x-72.5.1037

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Heated solutions of PS and SB were the most effective treatments to reduce the incidence of brown rot, gray mold, blue mold, and sour rot, caused by M. fructicola, Botrytis cinerea, Penicillium expansum, and Geotrichum candidum, respectively.

    “In other works, heated solutions of PS and SB were the most effective treatments to reduce the incidence of brown rot, gray mold, blue mold, and sour rot, caused by M. fructicola , Botrytis cinerea , Penicillium expansum , and Geotrichum candidum , respectively (Palou et al., 2009; Molinu et al., 2012).”

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 21

  1. Adaskaveg J. E., 2006, Cent. Valley Postharv. Newsl., 15, 1
  2. Adaskaveg J. E., 2007, Cent. Valley Postharv. Newsl., 16, 1
  3. Adaskaveg J. E., 2005, Calif. Agric., 59, 109, 10.3733/ca.v059n02p109 · DOI
  4. D'Aquino S., 2007, J. Agric. Food Chem., 55, 825, 10.1021/jf0628734 · DOI
  5. Droby S., 2003, Postharv. Biol. Technol., 27, 127, 10.1016/S0925-5214(02)00046-7 · DOI
  6. El-Ghaouth A., 1995, Plant Dis., 79, 254, 10.1094/PD-79-0254 · DOI
  7. Fallik, E. 2007. Heat treatments to control fungal diseases, p.21-38. In R. Troncoso-Rojas,M. E.Tiznado-Hernández, and A. González-León (ed.), Recent advances in alternative postharvest technologies to control fungal diseases in fruits and vegetables. Transworld Research Network, Trivandrum, Kerala,India.
  8. Förster H., 2007, Plant Dis., 91, 209, 10.1094/PDIS-91-2-0209 · DOI
  9. Gregori R., Proceedings of the COST Action 924 International Congress. CRIOF
  10. Karabulut O. A., 2002, Postharv. Biol. Technol., 24, 103, 10.1016/S0925-5214(01)00132-6 · DOI
  11. Ma Z., 2003, Appl. Environ. Microbiol., 69, 7145, 10.1128/AEM.69.12.7145-7152.2003 · DOI
  12. Margosan D. A., 1997, Plant Dis., 81, 1405, 10.1094/PDIS.1997.81.12.1405 · DOI
  13. Mari M., 2007, J. Sci. Food Agric., 87, 1271, 10.1002/jsfa.2839 · DOI
  14. Narayanasamy P., Postharvest pathogens and disease management, 10.1002/0471751987 · DOI
  15. Palou L., 2002, Postharv. Biol. Technol., 24, 39, 10.1016/S0925-5214(01)00118-1 · DOI
  16. Palou L., 2008, Stewart Postharv. Rev., 2, 1, 10.2212/spr.2008.2.2 · DOI · Paper page
  17. Palou L., 2002, Pest Manag. Sci., 58, 459, 10.1002/ps.477 · DOI
  18. Smilanick J. L., 2008, Postharv. Biol. Technol., 47, 226, 10.1016/j.postharvbio.2007.06.020 · DOI · Paper page
  19. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, 1998, Fed. Regist., 63, 34304
  20. U.S. Food and Drug Administration, 2008, Center for Food Safety and Applied Nutrition
  21. Wisniewski M. E., 1998, Proceedings of the 7th International Congress of Plant Pathology, 3

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Palou, L., Smilanick, J. L., & Crisosto, C. H.
Affiliations
  • Agricultural Research Service (US)
  • Kearney Agricultural Research and Extension Center (US)
Venue
Journal of Food Protection
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2009-05
Volume
72
Issue
5
Pages
1037-1046
ISSN
0362-028X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W71872189
Cited by
61
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 6 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 8 · 2012: 2
FWCI
5.26
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Food Protection (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
California Department of Food and Agriculture
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Postharvest Quality and Shelf Life Management
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Fungal Plant Pathogen Control
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Plant Disease Management Techniques
Keywords
food additives, fungicide alternatives, postharvest disease, stone fruit, brown rot, Monilinia fructicola, Botrytis cinerea, gray mold, sour rot, potassium sorbate, sodium benzoate, sodium sorbate, 2-deoxyglucose, potassium carbonate, sodium carbonate, molybdate, hydrogen peroxide, lactic acid, fludioxonil, fruit coating, peach, nectarine, plum, phytotoxicity, fruit decay control
MeSH terms
Citrus, Consumer Product Safety, Disinfectants, Drug Synergism, Food Additives, Food Contamination, Food Preservation, Fruit, Fungi, Fungicides, Industrial, Organic Chemicals, Temperature, Time Factors, Colony Count, Microbial, Prunus

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review