The DOI matches its Crossref record; 34 of the 34 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Determination of Species Composition in the Enallagma Damselfly Assemblages of Permanent Lakes
Abstract
In this study I investigated the important ecological interactions that contribute to maintaining a striking species distributional pattern for the Enallagma damselflies (Odonata: Coenagrionidae) among lakes that do and do not support fish populations. One group of Enallagma species is found as larvae only in lakes containing fish, while the remaining Enallagma species are found as larvae only in fishless lakes. I performed observational and experimental studies to evaluate the importance of water chemistry, competition among the Enallagma species, and predators of the Enallagma species in maintaining the two discrete assemblages. The results of observational studies suggested that water chemistry could not account for the pattern of species distributions, but that differences in predator compositions and competition among the Enallagma species may. Quantitative sampling indicated that dragonfly larvae were the most abundant invertebrate predator group in both lake types, with each lake type supporting a characteristic set of dragonfly species, as in the damselflies. Fish were also potentially major predators in lakes containing fish. Also, Enallagma densities in both lake types were among the highest reported in the literature, suggesting that density—dependent competitive interactions may potentially contribute to maintaining the Enallagma species distributions. The results of laboratory and field experiments demonstrated that predation by large dragonflies in fishless lakes and predation by fish in fish—containing lakes are two major environmental factors maintaining the Enallagma species distributions. When simultaneously offered two Enallagma species in the laboratory, one from the fishless lake group and one from the fish—containing lake group, fish consumed more individuals of species from the fishless lake group, but all dragonfly species, regardless of lake type affiliation, consumed more individuals of species from the fish—containing lake group. The results of field experiments in which I transplanted Enallagma species between the lake types showed that large dragonflies in fishless lakes and fish impose much greater mortality on Enallagma species with which they do not coexist than on those with which they do. Other field experimental results indicated that density—dependent competitive interactions among the Enallagma species were only apparent in the fishless lakes, affected species from both groups similarly, and altered their growth but not their survival. The results of this study are discussed in the context of overall community organization and the consequences to the evolution of species.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Evolution in Changing Environments: Some Theoretical Explorations. (MPB-2)
LEVINS, R. (2020) · Princeton University Press eBooks · doi:10.2307/j.ctvx5wbbh · Cited by 3,383
Brooks, J. L., & Dodson, S. I. (1965) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.150.3692.28 · Cited by 3,280
Fretwell, S. D., & Lucas, H. L. (1969) · Acta Biotheoretica · doi:10.1007/bf01601953 · Cited by 3,138
Predation, apparent competition, and the structure of prey communities
Holt, R. D. (1977) · Theoretical Population Biology · doi:10.1016/0040-5809(77)90042-9 · Cited by 2,535
Connell, J. H. (1961) · Ecology · doi:10.2307/1933500 · Cited by 2,123
Habitat Structural Complexity and the Interaction Between Bluegills and Their Prey
Crowder, L. B., & Cooper, W. E. (1982) · Ecology · doi:10.2307/1940122 · Cited by 1,358
Measuring Preference in Selective Predation
Chesson, J. (1978) · Ecology · doi:10.2307/1936364 · Cited by 1,037
Enemy free space and the structure of ecological communities
JEFFRIES, M. J., & LAWTON, J. H. (1984) · Biological Journal of the Linnean Society · doi:10.1111/j.1095-8312.1984.tb00145.x · Cited by 954
Encounter Probabilities and Community Structure in Zooplankton: a Mathematical Model
Gerritsen, J., & Strickler, J. R. (1977) · Journal of the Fisheries Research Board of Canada · doi:10.1139/f77-008 · Cited by 832
Spatial Heterogeneity, Indirect Interactions, and the Coexistence of Prey Species
Holt, R. D. (1984) · The American Naturalist · doi:10.1086/284280 · Cited by 769
Cited by
Adaptive radiation, nonadaptive radiation, ecological speciation and nonecological speciation
Rundell, R. J., & Price, T. D. (2009) · Trends in Ecology & Evolution · doi:10.1016/j.tree.2009.02.007 · Cited by 631
Individual Behavior and Higher-Order Species Interactions
Werner, E. E. (1992) · The American Naturalist · doi:10.1086/285395 · Cited by 226
Wood, P. J., Greenwood, M. T., Barker, S. A., & Gunn, J. (2001) · Biological Conservation · doi:10.1016/s0006-3207(01)00087-8 · Cited by 66
Identifying freshwater priority areas for cross-taxa interactions
Nogueira, J. G., Lopes-Lima, M., Beja, P., Filipe, A. F., Froufe, E., Gonçalves, D. V., da Silva, J. P., Sousa, R., Teixeira, A., Varandas, S., et al. (2023) · Science of The Total Environment · doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.161073 · Cited by 12
Metadata
- Authors
- McPeek, M. A.
- Venue
- Ecology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1990-02
- Volume
- 71
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 83-98
- ISSN
- 0012-9658 (ISSN-L)
- 1939-9170
- OpenAlex
- W2017097480
- Cited by
- 295
- References
- 34
- FWCI
- 13.10
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Determination of Species Composition in the Enallagma Damselfly Assemblages of Permanent Lakes. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2307/1940249
- The paper
- McPeek, M. A. (1990). Determination of Species Composition in the Enallagma Damselfly Assemblages of Permanent Lakes. Ecology. https://doi.org/10.2307/1940249
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.