Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 279

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Microbial methane consumption reactions and their effect on methane distributions in freshwater and marine environments1

Open access
Reeburgh, William S., Heggie, David T.·1977·Limnology and Oceanography

Abstract

A survey of reported methane distributions in sediments and the adjacent overlying water shows distinct differences between freshwater and marine environments. These differences may be explained by the activities of sulfate‐reducing bacteria and appear to be the result of differences in sulfate concentration between freshwater and marine environments.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.4319/lo.1977.22.1.0001

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 3 references

Cited by

See all 279

Metadata

Authors
Reeburgh, W. S., & Heggie, D. T.
Venue
Limnology and Oceanography
Publisher
Wiley
Published
1977-01
Volume
22
Issue
1
Pages
1-9
ISSN
  • 0024-3590 (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-5590
OpenAlex
W2042048458
Cited by
279
References
3
FWCI
9.30
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Microbial methane consumption reactions and their effect on methane distributions in freshwater and marine environments1. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.4319/lo.1977.22.1.0001
The paper
Reeburgh, W. S., & Heggie, D. T. (1977). Microbial methane consumption reactions and their effect on methane distributions in freshwater and marine environments1. Limnology and Oceanography. https://doi.org/10.4319/lo.1977.22.1.0001

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.