Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 198

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Implications of copepod predation1

Kerfoot, W. Charles·1977·Limnology and Oceanography

Abstract

The copepod Epischura nevadensis selectively preys on zooplankton communities in a way that reduces the abundance of the cladoceran Bosmina longirostris and favors larger‐bodied species. Bosmina responds to this predation by behavioral and morphological adjustments that frustrate the searching and handling strategies of the predatory copepods; this response implies considerable evolution between the two antagonists. Predation by copepods and other freshwater invertebrates seems an important factor in determining not only the size composition of lake communities, but the shape in some species.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.4319/lo.1977.22.2.0316

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Metadata

Authors
Kerfoot, W. C.
Venue
Limnology and Oceanography
Publisher
Wiley
Published
1977-03
Volume
22
Issue
2
Pages
316-325
ISSN
  • 0024-3590 (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-5590
OpenAlex
W1967038422
Cited by
198
References
1
FWCI
10.33
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Implications of copepod predation1. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.4319/lo.1977.22.2.0316
The paper
Kerfoot, W. C. (1977). Implications of copepod predation1. Limnology and Oceanography. https://doi.org/10.4319/lo.1977.22.2.0316

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.