Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 369

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 44 of the 44 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Suppression of rotifer populations by Daphnia: A review of the evidence, the mechanisms, and the effects on zooplankton community structure1

Open access
Gilbert, John J.·1988·Limnology and Oceanography

Abstract

There is strong evidence that rotifers cannot become abundant members of freshwater zooplankton communities in the presence of large (≳ 1.2 mm) Daphnia. Indirect evidence comes from field observations and experiments showing that rotifers are replaced by Daphnia in seasonal successions, that rotifers are much less common in communities with than without Daphnia, and that the experimental addition of zooplanktivorous fish causes the removal of Daphnia and a simultaneous increase in rotifer abundance, while the experimental removal of fish has just the opposite effect. Direct evidence comes from field experiments showing that the removal of Daphnia from communities causes a marked increase in the fertility and abundance of rotifers, and from laboratory experiments showing that Daphnia can kill and rapidly exclude rotifers in mixed‐species cultures. Rotifers are suppressed by large Daphnia both through exploitative competition for shared, limiting food resources and through mechanical interference. This interference can cause high mortality rates on susceptible rotifer species, even at low (1–5 ind. liter‒1) Daphnia densities and should affect the species structure of rotifers able to coexist with Daphnia in natural communities. Rotifers seem to be much less inhibited by small 1.2 mm) cladocerans and often co‐occur with them at high densities in natural communities in the absence of large Daphnia. There are several reasons why small cladocerans are less likely than large Daphnia to competitively suppress rotifers: small cladocerans generally do not mechanically interfere with rotifers, are less likely to deplete food resources, are themselves more likely to be suppressed by exploitative competition with rotifers, and usually are more susceptible to invertebrate predation. High rotifer abundance in the absence of Daphnia competition may have an important secondary effect in natural communities—the development of populations of invertebrate predators dependent on rotifer prey.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.4319/lo.1988.33.6.1286

Cites

44 of 44 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 44 references

Cited by

See all 369

Metadata

Authors
Gilbert, J. J.
Venue
Limnology and Oceanography
Publisher
Wiley
Published
1988-11
Volume
33
Issue
6
Pages
1286-1303
ISSN
  • 0024-3590 (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-5590
OpenAlex
W2171990050
Cited by
369
References
44
FWCI
11.01
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Suppression of rotifer populations by Daphnia: A review of the evidence, the mechanisms, and the effects on zooplankton community structure1. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.4319/lo.1988.33.6.1286
The paper
Gilbert, J. J. (1988). Suppression of rotifer populations by Daphnia: A review of the evidence, the mechanisms, and the effects on zooplankton community structure1. Limnology and Oceanography. https://doi.org/10.4319/lo.1988.33.6.1286

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.