The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Gross growth efficiencies of protozoan and metazoan zooplankton and their dependence on food concentration, predator‐prey weight ratio, and taxonomic group
Open accessAbstract
A comprehensive dataset on the gross growth efficiency (GGE) of planktonic protozoans and metazoans was gathered from the literature in order to (1) identify typical ranges of values, (2) to reexamine the taxon specificity of GGE, and (3) to evaluate the impact of food concentration, predator‐prey weight ratio, and temperature on GGE. All taxa (i.e. nano/microflagellates, dinoflagellates, ciliates, rotifers, cladocerans, and copepods) were found to have mean and median GGE of ∼20–30%. Contrary to the common practice of using different values of GGE for ciliates and crustaceans, I found that the GGE hardly differed between taxa. Variability within all taxa was high and could only partially be attributed to the independent variables mentioned above. The dependency of GGE on food concentrations was the most reliable relationship identified by multiple regression. Establishing further generalizations regarding the dependency of GGE on other factors was hampered by methodological differences among studies and taxa and the lack of information on other potentially important factors such as the elemental composition of prey items. Future studies of GGE should recognize the importance of these factors.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Phytoplankton growth, microzooplankton grazing, and carbon cycling in marine systems
Calbet, A., & Landry, M. R. (2004) · Limnology and Oceanography · doi:10.4319/lo.2004.49.1.0051 · Cited by 1,206
Significance of predation by protists in aquatic microbial food webs
Sherr, E. B., & Sherr, B. F. (2002) · Antonie van Leeuwenhoek · doi:10.1023/a:1020591307260 · Cited by 909
Upper ocean ecosystem dynamics and iron cycling in a global three-dimensional model
Moore, J. K., Doney, S. C., & Lindsay, K. (2004) · Global Biogeochemical Cycles · doi:10.1029/2004gb002220 · Cited by 889
Temperature effects on export production in the open ocean
Laws, E. A., Falkowski, P. G., Smith, W. O., Ducklow, H., & McCarthy, J. J. (2000) · Global Biogeochemical Cycles · doi:10.1029/1999gb001229 · Cited by 874
The Temperature‐Size Rule in Ectotherms: Simple Evolutionary Explanations May Not Be General
Angilletta, Jr., & Dunham, A. E. (2003) · The American Naturalist · doi:10.1086/377187 · Cited by 708
Metadata
- Authors
- Straile, D.
- Venue
- Limnology and Oceanography
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1997-09
- Volume
- 42
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 1375-1385
- ISSN
- 0024-3590 (ISSN-L)
- 1939-5590
- OpenAlex
- W2143998457
- Cited by
- 408
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 6.95
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Gross growth efficiencies of protozoan and metazoan zooplankton and their dependence on food concentration, predator‐prey weight ratio, and taxonomic group. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.4319/lo.1997.42.6.1375
- The paper
- Straile, D. (1997). Gross growth efficiencies of protozoan and metazoan zooplankton and their dependence on food concentration, predator‐prey weight ratio, and taxonomic group. Limnology and Oceanography. https://doi.org/10.4319/lo.1997.42.6.1375
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.