The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Coastal food web structure, carbon storage, and nitrogen retention regulated by consumer pressure and nutrient loading
Abstract
By factorial field experiments we analyzed the relative effects of increased nutrient (N+P) loading and natural grazing pressure on species composition, carbon storage, and nitrogen retention in the Baltic Sea littoral food web, composed of macroalgae, grazers (snails, isopods, amphipods), and predators (shrimps, crabs, fish). Nitrogen was depleted relative to phosphorus throughout most of the year. Increasing nitrogen (6–200% over ambient concentrations) enhanced algal productivity and cover of fast‐growing annual algae, grazer, and predator densities, suggesting a three‐alevel bottom‐up effect. With increasing nitrogen loading, annual algae increasingly blocked perennial algal recruitment (65‐98% decrease) and growth. Grazers counteracted the effects of nutrient enrichment on algal species composition through selective consumption of annual algae. Grazer exclusion had equivalent negative effects on perennial recruitment as a 85% increase in nitrogen loading. Nutrient enrichment increased algal nitrogen content and decreased tissue C: N ratios in spring and summer but not in fall. Carbon storage and nitrogen retention, measured as C and N retained in plant biomass at the end of the growth season, were increased by grazers (C: 39%, N: 24%) but decreased with increasing nitrogen loading (C: –%, N: –74%). Our results emphasize the important role of grazers in buffering moderate eutrophication effects and illustrate how food web interactions and shifts in species composition are tightly linked to coastal ecosystem function.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Cascading Trophic Interactions and Lake Productivity
Carpenter, S. R., Kitchell, J. F., & Hodgson, J. R. (1985) · BioScience · doi:10.2307/1309989 · Cited by 2,646
Neckles, H. A., Wetzel, R. L., & Orth, R. J. (1993) · Oecologia · doi:10.1007/bf00317683 · Cited by 276
Cited by
The C:N:P stoichiometry of organisms and ecosystems in a changing world: A review and perspectives
Sardans, J., Rivas-Ubach, A., & Peñuelas, J. (2012) · Perspectives in Plant Ecology, Evolution and Systematics · doi:10.1016/j.ppees.2011.08.002 · Cited by 685
META-ANALYSIS OF COD–SHRIMP INTERACTIONS REVEALS TOP-DOWN CONTROL IN OCEANIC FOOD WEBS
Worm, B., & Myers, R. A. (2003) · Ecology · doi:10.1890/0012-9658(2003)084[0162:maocsi]2.0.co;2 · Cited by 482
Self-citationBenedetti-Cecchi, L., Pannacciulli, F., Bulleri, F., Moschella, P., Airoldi, L., Relini, G., & Cinelli, F. (2001) · Marine Ecology Progress Series · doi:10.3354/meps214137 · Cited by 405
Effects of stocking-up freshwater food webs
EBY, L., ROACH, W., CROWDER, L., & STANFORD, J. (2006) · Trends in Ecology & Evolution · doi:10.1016/j.tree.2006.06.016 · Cited by 366
PATTERNS OF HERBIVORY AND DECOMPOSITION IN AQUATIC AND TERRESTRIAL ECOSYSTEMS
Cebrian, J., & Lartigue, J. (2004) · Ecological Monographs · doi:10.1890/03-4019 · Cited by 320
Metadata
- Authors
- Worm, B., Lotze, H. K., & Sommer, U.
- Venue
- Limnology and Oceanography
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2000-03
- Volume
- 45
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 339-349
- ISSN
- 0024-3590 (ISSN-L)
- 1939-5590
- OpenAlex
- W2109839992
- Cited by
- 178
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 8.21
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Coastal food web structure, carbon storage, and nitrogen retention regulated by consumer pressure and nutrient loading. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.4319/lo.2000.45.2.0339
- The paper
- Worm, B., Lotze, H. K., & Sommer, U. (2000). Coastal food web structure, carbon storage, and nitrogen retention regulated by consumer pressure and nutrient loading. Limnology and Oceanography. https://doi.org/10.4319/lo.2000.45.2.0339
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.