Cited by 43Medication Adherence and CompliancePharmacy and Medical PracticesPharmaceutical Practices and Patient Outcomes

Developing a generic, individualised adherence programme for chronic medication users

Open access
Herborg, Hanne, Haugbølle, Lotte S., Sørensen, Lene, Rossing, Charlotte, Dam, Pernille·2008·Pharmacy Practice (Internet)

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The scope of this article is to describe the background for and content of an adherence counselling programme with a specific focus on an individualised, multi-dimensional adherence model for patients with a potential adherence problem (a so-called 'individualised systems model'). METHODS: An intervention programme based on WHO's systems model for adherence was developed for implementation in primary health care and tested in a development project in Danish pharmacies in 2004-2005 in three pharmacies and 4 GP practices by 27 patients. Data were collected from the participants by registration forms, questionnaires, and focus groups. Since the programme was to support patients in the self-management process regarding choice and implementation of medication treatment, various strategies were used and different theoretical assumptions and choices made prior to setting up the study. These strategies include distinguishing between different types of non-adherence, a model for stages of change, self-efficacy, narratives, motivating interviewing strategies and coaching techniques. These strategic and theoretical choices are described in the article. RESULTS: The strategies and theoretical reflections formed the platform for the creation of a counselling programme, which was tested in two forms, a basic and an extended version - provided by either a pharmaconomist or a pharmacist. The result section also describes a toolbox of instruments to enable pharmacy staff and GPs to tailor a counselling programme for patients individually called 'Safe and effective use of medicines'. Besides, the results include a description of how the WHO-model is transformed into an individualised counselling model.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.4321/s1886-36552008000300006

Cites

36 of 36 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 37 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 5

  1. [2]Haynes RB Determinants of compliance: The disease and the mechanics of treatment 1979 Baltimor (MD) Johns Hopkins University Press
  2. [13]McDonald HP Garg AX Haynes RB Interventions to enhance patient adherence to medication prescriptions JAMA 2002 288 2868 2879 12472329
  3. [25]Prochaska JO DiClimente CC Norcross JC In search of how people change Am Psychol 1992 47 1102 1104 1329589
  4. [29]Barlow JH Cullen LA Rowe IF Educational preferences, psychological well-being and sef-efficary among people with reumatoid arthritis Patient Educ Couns 2002 46 11 19 11804765
  5. [36]Haynes R Yao X Degani A Kripalani S Garg A McDonald H Interventions to enhance medication adherence Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2005 2005 1 96 16235271

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Herborg, H., Haugbølle, L. S., Sørensen, L., Rossing, C., & Dam, P.
Affiliations
University of Copenhagen (DK)
Venue
Pharmacy Practice (Internet)
Published
2008-09
Volume
6
Issue
3
Pages
148-57
ISSN
  • 1885-642X (ISSN-L)
  • 1886-3655
OpenAlex
W2147346951
Cited by
43
References
37
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 1
FWCI
1.42
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by-nc
Locations
  • Pharmacy Practice (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Dialnet (Universidad de la Rioja) (submittedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • Hispana (submittedVersion)
  • Research at the University of Copenhagen (University of Copenhagen) (submittedVersion)
  • Redalyc (Universidad Autónoma del Estado de México) (submittedVersion)
  • Scientific Electronic library online (Sciences Carlos III Health Institute) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Family Practice › Medication Adherence and Compliance
  • Life Sciences › Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics › Pharmacology › Pharmacy and Medical Practices
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Geriatrics and Gerontology › Pharmaceutical Practices and Patient Outcomes
Keywords
medication adherence, adherence counseling, chronic medication use, self-management, stages of change, self-efficacy, coaching, narrative, pharmacist counseling, primary care

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review