The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Strategic cost management
Overview
AI snapshot
Written from the paper’s full text.
TL;DR
This chapter presents a practitioner-oriented framework for strategic cost management, linking the value equation, market structure analysis, cost analysis techniques, total cost of ownership, and collaborative supplier cost approaches. It argues that purchasing should optimize overall value rather than simply driving down unit purchase prices.
Key findings
- Value is defined as (Quality + Technology + Service + Cycle Time) / Price, so strategic management should optimize overall value rather than "blindly driving down unit purchase prices at the expense of quality or lead time."
- Purchasing strategy is segmented by a value/supply matrix: generics (low value/high supply) → automate purchasing and use p-cards/catalogs; commodities (high value/high supply) → competitive bidding and price analysis; unique products (low value/low supply) → reverse price analysis and migration toward standardization; critical products (high value/low supply) → comprehensive cost analysis, collaboration, and early supplier integration.
- Cost analysis tools include cost markup, margin pricing, rate-of-return pricing, reverse engineering/"should cost" breakdowns (direct materials, direct labor, overhead burden, SG&A/profit), and break-even analysis via Net Income = P(X) − VC(X) − FC.
- Total cost of ownership spans purchase price, acquisition and usage costs (sourcing administration, transportation, installation, maintenance, warranty, operational support), and end-of-life/opportunity costs (salvage, disposal, downtime, lost productivity).
- Collaborative mechanisms include target costing (Market Selling Price − Desired Profit = Allowable Target Cost) and cost savings sharing (e.g., a 50/50 split of labor or scrap savings); an 85% learning curve is given as an example, meaning direct labor declines by 15% each time production doubles.
Methods
- Not stated in the paper. The text is a conceptual/practitioner treatment organized as topic sections (value equation, market structures, pricing models, cost analysis, TCO, collaboration, project management, learning curves, VA/VE, quantity discounts, process mapping) with no described study design, sample, or data.
- No empirical analysis, dataset, or statistical method is reported; formulas and frameworks are presented illustratively.
Limitations
- Not stated in the paper. The text contains no limitations section or caveats about the frameworks presented.
- Evident from the text: the material is an outline-level presentation of concepts (bullet points and image placeholders) with no empirical evidence, case data, or citations to support the prescriptions; the break-even model's stated assumptions (fixed costs constant, variable costs linear) are the only explicit caveats given.
Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
1 No basis given
- Probably not a substantial claim. 1
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Strategic management focuses on optimizing overall value rather than blindly driving down unit purchase prices at the expense of quality or lead time.”
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: fails — It may be too vague to check against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
The authors state this as an assumption.
Fixed costs are constant.
“Assumptions: Fixed costs constant, variable costs linear.”
The authors state this as an assumption.
Variable costs are linear.
“Assumptions: Fixed costs constant, variable costs linear.”
Citations
Cites
The Rise and Fall of Management Accounting
Johnson, H. T., & Kaplan, R. S. (1987) · IEEE Engineering Management Review · doi:10.1109/emr.1987.4306297 · Cited by 341
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Assessing empirical research in managerial accounting: a value-based management perspective
Ittner, C. D., & Larcker, D. F. (2001) · Journal of Accounting and Economics · doi:10.1016/s0165-4101(01)00026-x · Cited by 1,143
Chenhall, R. H. (2004) · Accounting Organizations and Society · doi:10.1016/j.aos.2004.08.001 · Cited by 978
An exploratory investigation of an integrated contingency model of strategic management accounting
Cadez, S., & Guilding, C. (2008) · Accounting, Organizations and Society · doi:10.1016/j.aos.2008.01.003 · Cited by 736
Malmi, T. (1999) · Accounting Organizations and Society · doi:10.1016/s0361-3682(99)00011-2 · Cited by 513
Handbook of Management Accounting Research
(2009) · Handbooks of management accounting research · doi:10.1016/s1751-3243(07)x0001-4 · Cited by 512
Metadata
- Venue
- Management Accounting
- Publisher
- Routledge
- Published
- 2013-01-11
- Pages
- 139-152
- OpenAlex
- W1508084937
- Cited by
- 190
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 7
- FWCI
- 45.08
- Type
- book chapter
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Routledge eBooks (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Accounting › Accounting and Organizational Management
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Corporate Governance and Management
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Accounting › Accounting Theory and Financial Reporting
- Keywords
- strategic cost management, cost management, cost reduction, business strategy
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
A language model drew the claims from the paper on 2026-10-26, under version 3 of the claim definition (model deepseek-v4.1-flash, prompt extract-v3).
A second model labelled each claim on 2026-10-26 (model jev-1.13-20260917, definition revision gold-guideline-v0.2).
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review