Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 547

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Anchored Instruction: Why We Need It and How Technology Can Help

·2012·Cognition, Education, and Multimedia

Abstract

Most educators agree that we must help students learn to think for themselves and to solve problems (e.g., Feuerstein, 1979; Linn, 1986; Mann, 1979; Segal, Chipman, & Glaser, 1985). This emphasis on thinking has prompted educators to focus their attention on processes involved in thinking rather than only on the contents of thought. Nevertheless, research demonstrates that knowledge of important content-knowledge of concepts, theories, and principles-empowers people to think effectively. Without appropriate knowledge, people's ability to think and solve problems is relatively weak (e.g., Bransford, Sherwood, Vye, & Rieser, 1986; Newell, 1980; Simon, 1980).

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.4324/9780203052174-9

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 547

Metadata

Venue
Cognition, Education, and Multimedia
Publisher
Routledge
Published
2012-10-12
Pages
129-156
OpenAlex
W1768063535
Cited by
547
References
0
FWCI
50.16
Type
book chapter
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Anchored Instruction: Why We Need It and How Technology Can Help. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.4324/9780203052174-9
The paper
Anchored Instruction: Why We Need It and How Technology Can Help. (2012). Cognition, Education, and Multimedia. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203052174-9

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.