The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Basic Processes in Reading
Abstract
Contents: D. Besner, G.W. Humphreys, Basic Processes in Word Recognition and Identification: An Overview. C. Manso de Zuniga, G.W. Humphreys, L.J. Evett, Additive and Interactive Effects in the Reading of Handwriting. D. Howard, Letter-by-Letter Readers: Evidence for Parallel Processing. G.C. Van Orden, Phonological Mediation is Fundamental to Reading. P. Brown, DEREK: The Direct Encoding Routine for Evoking Knowledge. S. Monsell, The Nature and Locus of Word Frequency Effects in Reading. D.A. Balota, K. Rayner, Word Recognition Processes in Foveal and Parafoveal Vision: The Range of Influence of Lexical Variables. M.E.J. Masson, A Distributed Memory Model of Context Effects in Word Identification. J.H. Neely, Semantic Priming Effects in Visual Word Recognition: A Selective Review of Current Findings and Theories.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
The unbearable automaticity of being
Bargh, J. A., & Chartrand, T. L. (1999) · American Psychologist · doi:10.1037/0003-066x.54.7.462 · Cited by 3,699
Understanding normal and impaired word reading: Computational principles in quasi-regular domains.
Plaut, D. C., McClelland, J. L., Seidenberg, M. S., & Patterson, K. (1996) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.103.1.56 · Cited by 2,698
Conway, M. A. (2005) · Journal of Memory and Language · doi:10.1016/j.jml.2005.08.005 · Cited by 2,155
Beyond behaviorism: On the automaticity of higher mental processes.
Bargh, J. A., & Ferguson, M. J. (2000) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037//0033-2909.126.6.925 · Cited by 1,150
Time constraints and resource sharing in adults' working memory spans
Barrouillet, P., Bernardin, S., & Camos, V. (2004) · Journal of Experimental Psychology: General · doi:10.1037/0096-3445.133.1.83 · Cited by 994
Metadata
- Venue
- Routledge eBooks
- Publisher
- Routledge
- Published
- 2012-11-12
- OpenAlex
- W2060623169
- Cited by
- 983
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 22.22
- Type
- book
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Basic Processes in Reading. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.4324/9780203052242
- The paper
- Basic Processes in Reading. (2012). Routledge eBooks. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203052242
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
