The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Cognitive Flexibility, Constructivism, and Hypertext: Random Access Instruction for Advanced Knowledge Acquisition in Ill-Structured Domains
Abstract
A central argument of this chapter is that there is a common basis for the failure of many instructional systems. The claim is that these deficiencies in the outcomes of learning are strongly influenced by underlying biases and assumptions in the design of instruction that represent the instructional domain and its associated performance demands in an unrealistically simplified and well-structured manner. We offer a constructivist theory of learning and instruction that emphasizes the real-world complexity and ill-structuredness of many knowledge domains. Any effective approach to instruction must simultaneously consider several highly intertwined topics, such as: • the constructive nature of understanding; • the complex and ill-structured features of many, if not most, knowl- edge domains; • patterns of learning failure; and • a theory of learning that addresses known patterns of learning failure.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Situated Cognition and the Culture of Learning
Brown, J. S., Collins, A., & Duguid, P. (1989) · Educational Researcher · doi:10.3102/0013189x018001032 · Cited by 13,645 · cited 1×
“... criss-crossings, a design feature of Cognitive Flexibility Hypertexts is the provision of optional background information on the contexts immediately preceding the one being explored.) Because of the inability of abstract definitions (as might be construed for a theme such as “Soulless Man”) to cover Conceptual me…”
BackgroundBRUNER, J. S. (1960) · doi:10.4159/9780674028999 · Cited by 6,042
Chase, W. G., & Simon, H. A. (1973) · Cognitive Psychology · doi:10.1016/0010-0285(73)90004-2 · Cited by 4,479 · cited 1×
“…between introductory treatments of subject matter and the attainment of expertise for the subject, has been very little studied (certainly in comparison to the large number of studies of novices and experts--e.g., Chase & Simon, 1973; Chi et al., 1981; Feltovich, Johnson, Moller, & Swanson, 1984).”
Cognitive Apprenticeship: Teaching the Crafts of Reading, Writing, and Mathematics
Collins, A., Brown, J. S., & Newman, S. E. (2018) · Knowing, Learning, and Instruction · doi:10.4324/9781315044408-14 · Cited by 3,674
Cited by
Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge: A Framework for Teacher Knowledge
Mishra, P., & Koehler, M. J. (2006) · Teachers College Record: The Voice of Scholarship in Education · doi:10.1111/j.1467-9620.2006.00684.x · Cited by 12,604
(1995) · Cited by 2,867
First principles of instruction
Merrill, M. D. (2002) · Educational Technology Research and Development · doi:10.1007/bf02505024 · Cited by 2,092
Instructional design models for well-structured and III-structured problem-solving learning outcomes
Jonassen, D. H. (1997) · Educational Technology Research and Development · doi:10.1007/bf02299613 · Cited by 1,608
An instructional design framework for authentic learning environments
Herrington, J., & Oliver, R. (2000) · Educational Technology Research and Development · doi:10.1007/bf02319856 · Cited by 1,576
Metadata
- Venue
- Constructivism in Education
- Publisher
- Routledge
- Published
- 2012-10-12
- Pages
- 103-126
- OpenAlex
- W2895518762
- Cited by
- 1,357
- References
- 4
- FWCI
- 226.76
- Type
- book chapter
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Cognitive Flexibility, Constructivism, and Hypertext: Random Access Instruction for Advanced Knowledge Acquisition in Ill-Structured Domains. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.4324/9780203052600-11
- The paper
- Cognitive Flexibility, Constructivism, and Hypertext: Random Access Instruction for Advanced Knowledge Acquisition in Ill-Structured Domains. (2012). Constructivism in Education. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203052600-11
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.