The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Theories of Mathematical Learning
Abstract
Contents: Preface. Part I: P. Cobb, Sociological and Anthropological Perspectives on Mathematics Learning. P. Cobb, B. Jaworski, N. Presmeg, Emergent and Sociocultural Views of Mathematical Activity. J. Voigt, Negotiation of Mathematical Meaning in Classroom Processes: Social Interaction and Learning Mathematics. G.B. Saxe, T. Bermudez, Emergent Mathematical Environments in Children's Games. J. Richards, Negotiating the Negotiation of Meaning: Comments on Voigt (1992) and Saxe and Bermudez (1992). A.D. Schliemann, D.W. Carraher, Negotiationg Mathematical Meanings In and Out of School. E. Yackel, Social Interaction and Individual Cognition. B. van Oers, Learning Mathematics as a Meaningful Activity. E.A. Forman, Learning Mathematics as Participation in Classroom Practice: Implications of Sociocultural Theory for Educational Reform. K. Crawford, Cultural Processes and Learning: Expectations, Actions, and Outcomes. J.W. Stigler, C. Fernandez, M. Yoshida, Traditions of School Mathematics in Japanese and American Elementary Classrooms. Part II: B. Greer, Cognitive Science Theories and Their Contributions to the Learning of Mathematics. B. Greer, Theories of Mathematics Education: The Role of Cognitive Analyses. G. Hatano, A Conception of Knowledge Acquisition and Its Implications for Mathematics Education. G. Vergnaud, The Theory of Conceptual Fields. D.W. Carraher, Learning About Fractions. P.W. Thompson, Imagery and the Development of Mathematical Reasoning. R.B. Davis, Cognition, Mathematics, and Education. Part III: G.A. Goldin, The Contribution of Constructivism to the Learning of Mathematics. G.A. Goldin, Theory of Mathematics Education: The Contributions of Constructivism. E. von Glasersfeld, Aspects of Radical Constructivism and Its Educational Recommendations. F. Marton, D. Neuman, Phenomenography and Children's Experience of Division. P. Ernest, Varieties of Constructivism: A Framework for Comparison. N. Herscovics, The Construction of Conceptual Schemes in Mathematics. G. Booker, Constructing Mathematical Conventions Formed by the Abstraction and Generalization of Earlier Ideas: The Development of Initial Fraction Ideas. G.A. Goldin, J.J. Kaput, A Joint Perspective on the Idea of Representation in Learning and Doing Mathematics. C.A. Maher, A.M. Martino, Young Children Invent Methods of Proof: The Gang of Four. C. Janvier, Constructivism and Its Consequences for Training Teachers. Part IV: Perspectives on the Nature of Mathematical Learning. W. Dorfler, Is the Metaphor of Mental Object Appropriate for a Theory of Learning Mathematics? L.P. Steffe, H.G. Wiegel, On the Nature of a Model of Mathematical Learning.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
The Metaphor of Scaffolding: Its Utility for the Field of Learning Disabilities
Stone, C. A. (1998) · Journal of Learning Disabilities · doi:10.1177/002221949803100404 · Cited by 465
Participating in Classroom Mathematical Practices
Cobb, P., Stephan, M., McClain, K., & Gravemeijer, K. (2010) · A Journey in Mathematics Education Research · doi:10.1007/978-90-481-9729-3_9 · Cited by 448
Reflective Discourse and Collective Reflection
Cobb, P., Boufi, A., McClain, K., & Whitenack, J. (1997) · Journal for Research in Mathematics Education · doi:10.2307/749781 · Cited by 414
Teaching Children How to Use Language to Solve Maths Problems
Mercer, N., & Sams, C. (2006) · Language and Education · doi:10.2167/le678.0 · Cited by 314
Drawing on a Theoretical Model to Study Students’ Understandings of Fractions
Charalambous, C. Y., & Pitta-Pantazi, D. (2007) · Educational Studies in Mathematics · doi:10.1007/s10649-006-9036-2 · Cited by 287
Metadata
- Venue
- Routledge eBooks
- Publisher
- Routledge
- Published
- 2013-04-03
- OpenAlex
- W1586854670
- Cited by
- 550
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 34.00
- Type
- book
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Theories of Mathematical Learning. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.4324/9780203053126
- The paper
- Theories of Mathematical Learning. (2013). Routledge eBooks. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203053126
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.