Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 724

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Handbook of Critical Race Theory in Education

·2013·Routledge eBooks

Abstract

The above statement was taken from Hilliard’s (2003) chapter “No Mystery: Closing the Achievement Gap” in Young, Gifted and Black. We open with this quote because Hilliard’s problematizing the societal narrative concerning the “achievement gap” between blacks and whites draws attention to the way that racism functions in a conspicuous manner by, on the one hand, differentiating between whites’ and non-whites’ cognitive ability through a supposed objective measure (achievement/IQ test) (Arbuthnot, 2011; Gould, 1996; Steele & Aronson, 1995), while, on the other hand, simultaneously forwarding what we will refer to as a “seemingly expansive but inherently restrictive” discourse about racial hierarchies and relations. This discourse conflates the root cause of the dismal educational outcomes of African American children in U.S. schools with numerous issues, from biological considerations of intelligence (Herrnstein & Murray, 1994) to discussions of the inherent dysfunctionality of black families, communications styles, or communal beliefs about education (Asante, 2009; Delpit, 2008). Dominant narratives about the educational outcomes of African American students all but ignore the historical fact that our current educational system (established only decades after slavery and still 50 years removed from Brown) was designed in an era when the educability and actual humanity of African Americans was at issue (Watkins, 2001). This discourse also ignores the social, political, and moral debts levied against underrepresented students (Ladson-Billings, 2006). Our assertion is that this phenomenon is exacerbated by the fact that typically educators are socialized in a manner that hinders their ability to conceptualize their own racialized identities; we see understanding racial identity as an indispensable skill for building pedagogical relationships steeped in cultural knowledge and understanding about African American learners amongst and across racial barriers (Lewis et al., 2008).

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.4324/9780203155721

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 724

Metadata

Venue
Routledge eBooks
Publisher
Routledge
Published
2013-09-02
OpenAlex
W635363573
Cited by
724
References
1
FWCI
31.64
Type
book
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Handbook of Critical Race Theory in Education. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.4324/9780203155721
The paper
Handbook of Critical Race Theory in Education. (2013). Routledge eBooks. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203155721

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.