The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Handbook of Critical Race Theory in Education
Abstract
The above statement was taken from Hilliard’s (2003) chapter “No Mystery: Closing the Achievement Gap” in Young, Gifted and Black. We open with this quote because Hilliard’s problematizing the societal narrative concerning the “achievement gap” between blacks and whites draws attention to the way that racism functions in a conspicuous manner by, on the one hand, differentiating between whites’ and non-whites’ cognitive ability through a supposed objective measure (achievement/IQ test) (Arbuthnot, 2011; Gould, 1996; Steele & Aronson, 1995), while, on the other hand, simultaneously forwarding what we will refer to as a “seemingly expansive but inherently restrictive” discourse about racial hierarchies and relations. This discourse conflates the root cause of the dismal educational outcomes of African American children in U.S. schools with numerous issues, from biological considerations of intelligence (Herrnstein & Murray, 1994) to discussions of the inherent dysfunctionality of black families, communications styles, or communal beliefs about education (Asante, 2009; Delpit, 2008). Dominant narratives about the educational outcomes of African American students all but ignore the historical fact that our current educational system (established only decades after slavery and still 50 years removed from Brown) was designed in an era when the educability and actual humanity of African Americans was at issue (Watkins, 2001). This discourse also ignores the social, political, and moral debts levied against underrepresented students (Ladson-Billings, 2006). Our assertion is that this phenomenon is exacerbated by the fact that typically educators are socialized in a manner that hinders their ability to conceptualize their own racialized identities; we see understanding racial identity as an indispensable skill for building pedagogical relationships steeped in cultural knowledge and understanding about African American learners amongst and across racial barriers (Lewis et al., 2008).
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Mapping the Margins: Intersectionality, Identity Politics, and Violence against Women of Color
Crenshaw, K. (1991) · Stanford Law Review · doi:10.2307/1229039 · Cited by 32,792
Cited by
Annamma, S. A., Jackson, D. D., & Morrison, D. (2017) · Race Ethnicity and Education · doi:10.1080/13613324.2016.1248837 · Cited by 738
Critical Race Theory and the Whiteness of Teacher Education
Sleeter, C. E. (2017) · Urban Education · doi:10.1177/0042085916668957 · Cited by 699
Ong, M., Smith, J. M., & Ko, L. T. (2018) · Journal of Research in Science Teaching · doi:10.1002/tea.21417 · Cited by 613
Scheuerman, M. K., Wade, K., Lustig, C., & Brubaker, J. R. (2020) · Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction · doi:10.1145/3392866 · Cited by 193
Capper, C. A. (2015) · Educational Administration Quarterly · doi:10.1177/0013161x15607616 · Cited by 143
Metadata
- Venue
- Routledge eBooks
- Publisher
- Routledge
- Published
- 2013-09-02
- OpenAlex
- W635363573
- Cited by
- 724
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 31.64
- Type
- book
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Handbook of Critical Race Theory in Education. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.4324/9780203155721
- The paper
- Handbook of Critical Race Theory in Education. (2013). Routledge eBooks. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203155721
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.