The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Media Culture
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Describing the Bricolage: Conceptualizing a New Rigor in Qualitative Research
Kincheloe, J. L. (2001) · Qualitative Inquiry · doi:10.1177/107780040100700601 · Cited by 677
Toward Critical Media Literacy: Core concepts, debates, organizations, and policy
Kellner, D., & Share, J. (2005) · Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education · doi:10.1080/01596300500200169 · Cited by 631
Self-citationRethinking the role of Indigenous knowledges in the academy
Dei, G. J. S. (2000) · International Journal of Inclusive Education · doi:10.1080/136031100284849 · Cited by 564
Brands: A critical perspective
Arvidsson, A. (2005) · Journal of Consumer Culture · doi:10.1177/1469540505053093 · Cited by 522
On to the Next Level: Continuing the Conceptualization of the Bricolage
Kincheloe, J. L. (2005) · Qualitative Inquiry · doi:10.1177/1077800405275056 · Cited by 447
Metadata
- Authors
- Kellner, D.
- Venue
- Routledge eBooks
- Publisher
- Routledge
- Published
- 2003-07-13
- OpenAlex
- W4232479914
- Cited by
- 828
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 44.21
- Type
- book
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Media Culture. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.4324/9780203205808
- The paper
- Kellner, D. (2003). Media Culture. Routledge eBooks. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203205808
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.