Cited by 2

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Utopian Visions and Architectural Designs of Turn-of-the-Century Social Settlements

·2003·Embodied Utopias

Abstract

This chapter explores how nineteenth-century women social reformers materially embodied their utopian visions of society through architectural designs of their public institutions. Reformers made women’s public professions and institutions acceptable within the dominant Victorian gender ideology by depicting them as extensions of women’s domestic roles (Spencer-Wood 1999a: 170-1). As reformers expanded woman’s domestic sphere to encompass man’s public sphere, they successfully argued that women’s superior morality enabled them to control their expanded sphere, increasing women’s power in both the home and the public realm. Unlike their contemporaries, the suffragists, domestic reformers did not directly confront male dominance in the public sphere by arguing that women should have public roles. Nonetheless, the reformers’ argument that women would bring a higher moral tone to government was instrumental in gaining the majority of men’s support for female suffrage (Spencer-Wood 1991: 241; 1994a: 178-80).

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.4324/9780203451540-18

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Intersectionality theory identifies privilege as a function of power; however, one's degree of privilege is contextually and situationally variable because power is really heterarchical and individuals and groups often have overlapping, cooperative, or complementary roles in society, which means everybody moves in spaces where power often exists in 'both/and' rather than 'either/or' contexts.

    “Intersectionality theory identifies privilege as a function of power; however, one's degree of privilege is contextually and situationally variable because power is really heterarchical and individuals and groups often have overlapping, cooperative, or complementary roles in society, which means everybody moves in spaces where power often exists in ''both/and'' rather than ''either/or'' contexts (”

Citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Venue
Embodied Utopias
Publisher
Routledge
Published
2003-12-16
Pages
134-150
Cited by
0
References
0
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review