CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 48Historical and Cultural Archaeology StudiesGender and Feminist StudiesFeminism, Gender, and Intersectionality

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 76 of the 76 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Feminist Theorizing of Patriarchal Colonialism, Power Dynamics, and Social Agency Materialized in Colonial Institutions

Spencer-Wood, Suzanne M.·2016·International Journal of Historical Archaeology
DOI 10.1007/s10761-016-0356-3
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

In the twenty-first century historical archaeologists have increasingly drawn on post-colonial theory to analyze the European conquest and colonization of the Americas, Australasia, and Africa. However, few have employed feminist theories to gain insights into the patriarchal power dynamics that were fundamental to institutionalized colonial ideologies and practices. This paper provides feminist theorizing of new concepts and a heterarchical model of multiple interacting powers that increase understanding of complex gender and sexual power dynamics between colonizers and colonized.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s10761-016-0356-3

Cites

76 of 76 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • An edited volume and a journal issue present research on intersectional colonialism, including Spencer-Wood's (2016) explicitly intersectional article gendering external and internal colonialism and conceptualizing patriarchal economic colonialism, patriarchal domestic colonialism and patriarchal sexual colonialism.

    “An edited volume and a journal issue present research on intersectional colonialism (Frink & Weedman, 2005;Matackney & Palmer, 2016), including Spencer-Wood's (2016) explicitly intersectional article gendering external and internal colonialism and conceptualizing patriarchal economic colonialism, patriarchal domestic colonialism and patriarchal sexual colonialism.”

    From Introduction to Archaeologies Special Issue on Intersectionality Theory and Research in Historical Archaeology (2022) · cites this paper as Spencer-Wood, 2016

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 8

  1. Alexander, R. T. (1998). Afterword: toward an archaeological theory of culture contact. In Cusiek, J. G. (ed.), Studies in Culture Contact, Center for Archaeological Investigations, Southern Illinois University, Carbondale, pp. 476–495.
  2. Battle-Baptiste, W. (2011). Black Feminist Archaeology. Left Coast Press, Walnut Creek CA.
  3. Deetz, J. F. (1963). Archaeological Investigations at La Purisima Mission, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, pp. 163–208.
  4. Habicht-Mauche, J. A. (2005). The shifting role of women and women’s labor on the protohistoric southern high plains. In Frink, L., and Weedman, K. (eds.), Gender and Hide Production, Altamira, Walnut Creek, pp. 37–47.
  5. Holliman, S. E. (2005). Hideworking and changes in women’s status among the Arikara, 1700-1862. In Frink, L., and Weedman, K. (eds.), Gender and Hide Production, Altamira, Walnut Creek, CA, pp. 77–88.
  6. Hymowitz, C., and Weissman, M. (1978). A History of Women in America: From Founding Mothers to Feminists, How Women Shaped the Life and Culture of America, Bantam, New York.
  7. Spencer-Wood, S. M. (1994). Diversity in 19th century domestic reform: relationships among classes and ethnic groups. In Scott, E. M. (ed.), Those “Of Little Note”: Gender, Race and Class in Historical Archaeology, University of Arizona Press, Tucson, pp. 175–208.
  8. Spencer-Wood, S. M. (1999b). Gendering power. In Sweely, T. L. (ed.), Manifesting Power: Gender and the Interpretation of Power in Archaeology, Routledge, London, pp. 175–183.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Related

Metadata

Authors
Spencer-Wood, S. M.
Venue
International Journal of Historical Archaeology
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Published
2016-07-27
Volume
20
Issue
3
Pages
477-491
ISSN
  • 1092-7697 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-7748
DOI
10.1007/s10761-016-0356-3
OpenAlex
W2504467990
Cited by
48
References
75
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 2
FWCI
6.23
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
www.springer.com/tdm (unspecified)
Locations
International Journal of Historical Archaeology (publishedVersion)
Funders
Henan Institute of Science and Technology
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Anthropology › Historical and Cultural Archaeology Studies
  • Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Gender and Feminist Studies
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Feminism, Gender, and Intersectionality
Keywords
feminist theory, patriarchy, colonialism, power relations, social agency, colonial institutions, material culture, gender and colonialism

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review