The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Social Dominance Theory: A New Synthesis
Abstract
This chapter suggests that within relatively stable group- based hierarchies, most of the activities of subordinates can be characterized as cooperative rather than subversive to the system of group-based domination. It argues that it is subordinates&s; high level of both passive and active cooperation with their own oppression that provides systems of group-based social hierarchy with their remarkable degrees of resiliency, robustness, and stability. The chapter also suggests that this point is established at the fulcrum between: hierarchy-enhancing forces and hierarchy-attenuating forces. While social dominance theory has been influenced by models within personality psychology, social psychology, and political sociology, it is neither strictly a psychological nor sociological theory, but rather an attempt to connect the worlds of individual personality and attitudes with the domains of institutional behavior and social structure. Thus, social dominance theory is an attempt to integrate several levels of analysis into one coherent theoretical framework.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
The origins and nature of compassion focused therapy
Gilbert, P. (2014) · British Journal of Clinical Psychology · doi:10.1111/bjc.12043 · Cited by 1,593
Antecedents and Consequences of System-Justifying Ideologies
Jost, J. T., & Hunyady, O. (2005) · Current Directions in Psychological Science · doi:10.1111/j.0963-7214.2005.00377.x · Cited by 1,063
Collective narcissism and its social consequences.
de Zavala, A. G., Cichocka, A., Eidelson, R., & Jayawickreme, N. (2009) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/a0016904 · Cited by 704
Pereira, C., Vala, J., & Costa‐Lopes, R. (2010) · European Journal of Social Psychology · doi:10.1002/ejsp.718 · Cited by 269
Social psychophysiology and embodiment
Blascovich, J., & Mendes, W. B. (2010) · Handbook of Social Psychology · doi:10.1002/9780470561119.socpsy001006 · Cited by 274
Metadata
- Authors
- Sidanius, J., & Pratto, F.
- Venue
- Political Psychology
- Publisher
- Psychology Press
- Published
- 2004-01-09
- Pages
- 315-332
- ISSN
- 0162-895X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2279570057
- Cited by
- 183
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 31.04
- Type
- book chapter
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Social Dominance Theory: A New Synthesis. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.4324/9780203505984-18
- The paper
- Sidanius, J., & Pratto, F. (2004). Social Dominance Theory: A New Synthesis. Political Psychology. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203505984-18
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.