Cited by 327Logic and Philosophy of SciencePhilosophy of Biology and Scientific ExplanationHistory and Theory of Mathematics

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Conjectures and Refutations: The Growth of Scientific Knowledge

Popper, Karl·2014·Routledge eBooks

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.4324/9780203538074

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 101–200 of 326

Metadata

Authors
Popper, K.
Corresponding author
Popper, Karl
Venue
Routledge eBooks
Publisher
Routledge
Published
2014-05-01
Volume
19
Issue
2
OpenAlex
W3126953938
Cited by
327
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 22 · 2025: 27 · 2024: 18 · 2023: 27 · 2022: 17 · 2021: 23 · 2020: 14 · 2019: 22 · 2018: 16 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 7
FWCI
14.52
Type
book
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Routledge eBooks (publishedVersion)
  • The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History and Philosophy of Science › Logic and Philosophy of Science
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History and Philosophy of Science › Philosophy of Biology and Scientific Explanation
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History and Philosophy of Science › History and Theory of Mathematics
Keywords
conjecture, refutation, scientific reasoning, hypothesis testing

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review