Cited by 31Political Conflict and GovernanceNatural Resources and Economic DevelopmentPolitical Theory and Democracy

Democratization: A Comparative Analysis of 170 Countries

Vanhanen, Tatu·2004·Routledge eBooks

Abstract

This book examines the relationship between indicators of resource distribution and democratization in the group of 170 countries with data ranging from the 1850s to the present day. Vanhanen constructs a compelling argument, concluding that the emergence of democracy is closely linked to resource distribution.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.4324/9780203614501

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Vanhanen, T.
Corresponding author
Vanhanen, Tatu
Venue
Routledge eBooks
Publisher
Routledge
Published
2004-02-24
OpenAlex
W4248995187
Cited by
31
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 4 · 2016: 1 · 2013: 1
FWCI
0.55
Type
book
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Routledge eBooks (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Political Conflict and Governance
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › General Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Natural Resources and Economic Development
  • Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Political Theory and Democracy
Keywords
democratization, resource allocation, economic inequality, cross-national comparison

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review